AUTHOR=Zhou Tao , Chen Weikang , Wu Zhigang , Cai Jian , Zhou Chaofeng
TITLE=A newly defined basement membrane-related gene signature for the prognosis of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma
JOURNAL=Frontiers in Genetics
VOLUME=13
YEAR=2022
URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genetics/articles/10.3389/fgene.2022.994208
DOI=10.3389/fgene.2022.994208
ISSN=1664-8021
ABSTRACT=Background: Basement membranes (BMs) are associated with cell polarity, differentiation, migration, and survival. Previous studies have shown that BMs play a key role in the progression of cancer, and thus could serve as potential targets for inhibiting the development of cancer. However, the association between basement membrane-related genes (BMRGs) and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remains unclear. To address that gap, we constructed a novel risk signature utilizing BMRGs to explore the relationship between ccRCC and BMs.
Methods: We gathered transcriptome and clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and randomly separated the data into training and test sets to look for new potential biomarkers and create a predictive signature of BMRGs for ccRCC. We applied univariate, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate Cox regression analyses to establish the model. The risk signature was further verified and evaluated through principal component analysis (PCA), the Kaplan-Meier technique, and time-dependent receiver operating characteristics (ROC). A nomogram was constructed to predict the overall survival (OS). The possible biological pathways were investigated through functional enrichment analysis. In this study, we also determined tumor mutation burden (TMB) and performed immunological analysis and immunotherapeutic drug analysis between the high- and low-risk groups.
Results: We identified 33 differentially expressed genes and constructed a risk model of eight BMRGs, including COL4A4, FREM1, CSPG4, COL4A5, ITGB6, ADAMTS14, MMP17, and THBS4. The PCA analysis showed that the signature could distinguish the high- and low-risk groups well. The K-M and ROC analysis demonstrated that the model could predict the prognosis well from the areas under the curves (AUCs), which was 0.731. Moreover, the nomogram showed good predictability. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis validated that the model results supported the hypothesis that BMRGs were independent risk factors for ccRCC. Furthermore, immune cell infiltration, immunological checkpoints, TMB, and the half-inhibitory concentration varied considerably between high- and low-risk groups.
Conclusion: Employing eight BMRGs to construct a risk model as a prognostic indicator of ccRCC could provide us with a potential progression trajectory as well as predictions of therapeutic response.