AUTHOR=Halmesvaara Otto , Vornanen Marleena , Kääriäinen Helena , Perola Markus , Kristiansson Kati , Konttinen Hanna TITLE=Psychosocial Effects of Receiving Genome-Wide Polygenic Risk Information Concerning Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Heart Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial JOURNAL=Frontiers in Genetics VOLUME=13 YEAR=2022 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genetics/articles/10.3389/fgene.2022.881349 DOI=10.3389/fgene.2022.881349 ISSN=1664-8021 ABSTRACT=

Receiving polygenic risk estimates of future disease through health care or direct-to-consumer companies is expected to become more common in the coming decades. However, only a limited number of studies have examined if such estimates might evoke an adverse psychosocial reaction in receivers. The present study utilized data from a sub-section of a personalized medicine project (the P5 study) that combines genomic and traditional health data to evaluate participants’ risk for certain common diseases. We investigated how communication of future disease risk estimates related to type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease influenced respondents’ risk perception, self-efficacy, disease-related worry, and other emotions. A randomized controlled trial was conducted, where the experimental group (n = 714) received risk estimates based on traditional and polygenic risk factors and the control group (n = 649) based solely on traditional risk factors. On average, higher disease risk was associated with higher perceived risk (ps, <0.001, ηp2 = 0.087–0.071), worry (ps <0.001, ηp2 = 0.061–0.028), lower self-efficacy (p <0 .001, ηp2 = 0.012), less positive emotions (ps <0.04, ηp2 = 0.042–0.005), and more negative emotions (ps <0.048, ηp2 = 0.062–0.006). However, we found no evidence that adding the polygenic risk to complement the more traditional risk factors would induce any substantive psychosocial harm to the recipients (ps >0.06).