AUTHOR=Lv Min-Yi , Wang Wei , Zhong Min-Er , Cai Du , Fan Dejun , Li Cheng-Hang , Kou Wei-Bin , Huang Ze-Ping , Duan Xin , Hu Chuling , Zhu Qiqi , He Xiaosheng , Gao Feng 

TITLE=DNA Repair–Related Gene Signature in Predicting Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer Patients

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Genetics

VOLUME=13

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genetics/articles/10.3389/fgene.2022.872238

DOI=10.3389/fgene.2022.872238

ISSN=1664-8021

ABSTRACT=<p><bold>Background:</bold> Increasing evidence have depicted that DNA repair–related genes (DRGs) are associated with the prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of DNA repair–related gene signature (DRGS) in predicting the prognosis of CRC patients.</p><p><bold>Method:</bold> In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the gene expression profiles from six CRC cohorts. A total of 1,768 CRC patients with complete prognostic information were divided into the training cohort (<italic>n</italic> = 566) and two validation cohorts (<italic>n</italic> = 624 and 578, respectively). The LASSO Cox model was applied to construct a prediction model. To further validate the clinical significance of the model, we also validated the model with Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) and an advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) immunotherapy data set.</p><p><bold>Results:</bold> We constructed a prognostic DRGS consisting of 11 different genes to stratify patients into high- and low-risk groups. Patients in the high-risk groups had significantly worse disease-free survival (DFS) than those in the low-risk groups in all cohorts [training cohort: hazard ratio (HR) = 2.40, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.67–3.44; validation-1: HR = 2.20, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001, 95% CI = 1.38–3.49 and validation-2 cohort: HR = 2.12, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001, 95% CI = 1.40–3.21). By validating the model with GDSC, we could see that among the chemotherapeutic drugs such as oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan, the IC50 of the cell line in the low-risk group was lower. By validating the model with the ccRCC immunotherapy data set, we can clearly see that the overall survival (OS) of the objective response rate (ORR) with complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) in the low-risk group was the best.</p><p><bold>Conclusions:</bold> DRGS is a favorable prediction model for patients with CRC, and our model can predict the response of cell lines to chemotherapeutic agents and potentially predict the response of patients to immunotherapy.</p>