Hufei Wang1†
Kangjia Luo1†
Zilong Guan1†
Zhi Li2
Jun Xiang1
Suwen Ou1
Yangbao Tao1Songlin Ran1Jinhua Ye1Tianyi Ma1Tianyu Qiao1Zhiming Zhang3Yinghu Jin1*Yanni Song4*Rui Huang1*- 1Department of Colorectal Cancer Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
- 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
- 3Department of Thoracic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
- 4Department of Breast Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignant cancer worldwide with the second highest mortality. Gut microbiota can educate the tumor microenvironment (TME), consequently influencing the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Fusobacterium nucleatum is one of the most crucial bacteria contributing to colorectal tumorigenesis, but the molecular mechanisms between F. nucleatum and TME or ICIs are poorly investigated. In the present study, we firstly analyzed differentially expressed genes and the biological functions between F. nucleatum-infected and uninfected CRC cell lines, with the findings that CCL22 mRNA expression was markedly upregulated after F. nucleatum infection. Moreover, the survival analysis showed that CCL22 was significantly associated with the overall survival of CRC patients. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis suggested that CCL22 was related to immune-related terms. Furthermore, the ESTIMATE analysis indicated that the high-CCL22-expression subgroup had a higher immune/stromal/estimate score and lower tumor purity. The CIBERSORT analysis indicated that the high-CCL22-expression group had more immune-suppressive cells and less antitumor immune cells. In addition, immune checkpoint genes and cytotoxic genes were positively correlated with CCL22 expression. The immunophenoscore analysis suggested that CCL22 was associated with the IPS-CTLA4 and PD1/PD-L1/PD-L2 score. Interestingly, CCL22 expression in the KRAS and APC mutation groups was markedly reduced compared to that of the wild groups. In summary, our study provided evidence that CCL22 might play a crucial role in F. nucleatum-related colorectal tumorigenesis and correlate with TME and ICIs, which deserves further study.
Introduction
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignant cancer worldwide with the second highest mortality (Siegel et al., 2020a; Siegel et al., 2020b). In order to seek effective treatment options, it is urgent to find new therapeutic targets of CRC.
Fusobacterium nucleatum (F. nucleatum), a common member of the oral microbiota known to have a symbiotic relationship with its hosts, has been shown to play a critical role in the development of CRC. Studies have reported that F. nucleatum influenced cell metastasis, proliferation, and migration mediated by abnormalities of lncRNA expression, activation of autophagy, and alteration of metabolism (Yang et al., 2017; Yu et al., 2017; Hong et al., 2020). Importantly, F. nucleatum can influence colorectal tumorigenesis directly by regulating the tumor microenvironment (TME) via increasing myeloid-derived suppressor cells, inhibiting the receptors of natural killer (NK) cells, and controlling T-cell-mediated immune responses (Kostic et al., 2013; Mima et al., 2016; Dong et al., 2020; Serna et al., 2020), which significantly affected the therapeutic response and clinical outcome of patients (Quail and Joyce, 2013; Wood et al., 2014). Hence, dissecting the underlying mechanism of cross-talk between F. nucleatum and TME will help search for the potential therapeutic targets.
TME, mainly constituting immune cells and stromal cells (Guo et al., 2018; Stankovic et al., 2018), can shape the development of tumor and impact the response to tumor therapy (Böttcher et al., 2018). Regulating TME is one of the most promising strategies for tumor therapy—for instance, more CD8+ T cell infiltration in CRC was generally associated with a favorable prognosis (Galon et al., 2006; Nazemalhosseini-Mojarad et al., 2019). In addition, studies have shown that TME also influenced the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Christopher et al. found that successful anti-PD-1 immunotherapy required the communication of T cells and dendritic cells, which involves the cytokines (Garris et al., 2018). Another study revealed that the efficacy of anti-CTLA-4 therapy relied on regulatory T cell (Treg) depletion during treatment (Arce Vargas et al., 2018). Yu et al. also pointed out that re-modulating the TME enhanced the effect of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in CRC patients with microsatellite stability (Yu et al., 2019). However, the specific molecular mechanisms underlying the interactions between F. nucleatum and the TME or ICIs are poorly understood.
Chemokines, a family of low-molecular-weight proteins, are important parts of the communication of tumor cells and the TME and involved in shaping the immune system in modulating immune cell infiltration (Cabrero-de Las Heras and Martínez-Balibrea, 2018). As a member of the chemokine family, CCL22 was reported to promote Treg communication with dendritic cells to control immunity through their CCR4 receptor in lymph nodes (Rapp et al., 2019). CCL22 also promoted Treg recruitment into the TME and inhibited anticancer immunity in melanoma (Anz et al., 2015; Martinenaite et al., 2016). In addition, some studies showed that CCL22 mRNA expression was significantly higher in tumor tissue compared with paired normal tissue in colorectal adenocarcinomas (Wågsäter et al., 2008; Huang et al., 2015; Heeran et al., 2021). Notably, CCL22 was expressed on exposure to gut microbiota and correlated with Treg and Th1 in CRC (Cremonesi et al., 2018). Wang et al. found that the upregulation of CCL22 recruited Th17 cells to promote colon carcinogenesis in miR-34a−/− mice infected by Citrobacter rodentium (Wang et al., 2018), which linked the upregulation of CCL22 to the gut microbiota. However, the role of CCL22 in F. nucleatum-associated TME has not been well studied.
In this research, we firstly found that the expression of CCL22 was upregulated in CRC cell lines infected by F. nucleatum using Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets. The upregulation of CCL22 was accompanied by an increase in immune score and a decrease in stromal score in patients of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) colon adenocarcinoma (COAD). A further analysis of the composition of immune cells in the TME showed that the high-CCL22-expression subgroup had more immune-suppressive cells (such as Treg and T follicular helper cells) and less antitumor immune cells (such as activated NK cells). In addition, CCL22 was positively correlated with immune checkpoint genes (BTLA, CTLA4, TIGIT, HAVCR2, CD274, PDCD1, and LAG3) and cytotoxic genes (TNFSF11, GZMA, IFNG, PRF1, GZMK, and GZMM). The IPS-CTLA4 and PD1/PD-L1/PD-L2 score was higher in the high-CCL22-expression subgroup. We also found that the expression of CCL22 was related to overall survival (OS), M stage, APC mutation, and KRAS mutation in TCGA COAD patients. In summary, these results indicated that CCL22 might play a pivotal role in F. nucleatum-related colorectal tumorigenesis and correlate with the TME and immune checkpoint therapy.
Materials and Methods
Data Source
The RNA expression data of CRC cell lines infected by F. nucleatum was downloaded from the GEO database, with accession numbers GEO: GSE141805 (HCT-116) and GSE90944 (HT-29), which respectively contains three pairs of samples (F. nucleatum vs. control). In addition, the RNA expression data and clinicopathological information of TCGA COAD were obtained from the TCGA database using the “TCGA-biolinks” package in R Studio (Colaprico et al., 2016). Count value was transformed to transcripts per million (TPM) for further analysis, and GSE39582, with a large sample size and complete survival information, was downloaded as a validation dataset. All data were normalized to ensure standardization. The gene symbols that were detected in more than one probe were kept for further analysis. In total, 20,407 immune-related genes (IRGs) were downloaded from the Molecular Signature Database (MSigDB) C7 immunologic signature gene sets (Subramanian et al., 2005). The detailed information of datasets and online websites used in our study are shown in Table 1 and Table 2.
TABLE 1. Detailed information of the datasets used in our study.
TABLE 2. Detailed information of the online websites used in our study.
Differential Gene Analysis
GSE141805 and GSE90944 were used to explore the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between F. nucleatum‐infected and uninfected CRC cell lines via the R package “edgeR” in R Studio (Robinson et al., 2010). The cutoff threshold is p-value <.05 and |log2FC| ≥ 1. To select the IRGs related to F. nucleatum infection, immune-related (IR) DEGs were obtained by intersecting IRGs and DEGs, which were visualized using the “venn” package.
Gene Set Variation Analysis
Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) was performed to investigate the underlying functions and pathways affected by F. nucleatum with the “GSVA” package (Hänzelmann et al., 2013). The gene set “c2.cp.kegg.v6.2.symbols.gmt” in MSigDB was selected as the reference gene set. The heat map of enrichment terms was visualized using the “pheatmap” package.
K–M Survival Analysis
To further analyze the prognostic power of the IR DEGs, patients of TCGA-COAD and GSE39582 were divided into high-expression and low-expression subgroups based on the median expression value of each differentially expressed (DE) IRG, and a survival analysis was conducted by the Kaplan–Meier (K–M) method using the “survival” package.
Functional Enrichment Analysis
To explore the potential biological functions related to CCL22, the top 100 genes expressing similarly to CCL22 (Sun et al., 2021), downloaded from GEPIA 1.0 website (Tang et al., 2017), were subjected to Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis using the “clusterProfiler” package (Yu et al., 2012), which was also used for the visualization of enrichment terms. In addition, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was applied to explore the changed biological functions based on the high- and low-CCL22-expression subgroups in TCGA COAD using the “clusterProfiler” package. The GSEA results of GO and KEGG were respectively calculated based on MSigDB c5.all.v7.0.symbols.gmt and c2.cp.kegg.v7.0.symbols.gmt in R studio, which was visualized using the “enrichplot” package.
Evaluation of Tumor Microenvironment
To dissect the TME associated with CCL22, TCGA-COAD TPM was used to calculate the estimate/immune/stromal score and tumor purity using the “estimate” package based on the high- and low-CCL22-expression subgroups (Yoshihara et al., 2013). Then, the “CIBERSORT” package was used to estimate the proportions of 22 types of immune cells in the TME (Newman et al., 2015).
Immunophenoscore Analysis
Immunophenoscore (IPS), calculated based on the four main types of genes that determine immunogenicity, has the ability to predict the patients’ response to ICIs (Charoentong et al., 2017). The IPS range is between 0 and 10. The higher the score, the stronger the immunogenicity and the better the response to ICIs. The IPSs of TCGA COAD patients were downloaded from The Cancer Immunome Atlas (TCIA) (Charoentong et al., 2017).
Mutation Analysis
The mutation data of 399 COAD patients were obtained from the TCGA website, which was analyzed using the “maftools” package in R Studio (Mayakonda et al., 2018). The tumor mutation burden (TMB) was calculated using the formula: (total mutation / total covered bases) × 106. Then, TIMER 2.0 website was used to investigate the CCL22 mutation status in COAD and the correlation between APC/KRAS mutation and CCL22 expression (Li et al., 2020).
Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were performed in R 4.0.3 and its appropriate packages. Data were analyzed with standard statistical tests as appropriate. * represented p <.05, ** represented p <.01, *** represented p <.001, and ns represented no statistical difference.
Results
F. nucleatum Affects Gene Expression and Biological Functions in Colorectal Cancer Cells
The flow diagram of our study is shown in Figure 1. Based on p-value <.05 and |log2FC| ≥ 1.0, we respectively obtained 752 DEGs (373 upregulated and 379 downregulated) in GSE90944 and 589 DEGs (260 up upregulated and 329 downregulated) in GSE141805, which were displayed as volcano plots (Figures 2A,B). The top 50 DEGs were visualized using heat maps (Figures 2C,D). The detailed information of the DEGs is shown in Supplementary Table S1. GSVA was used to further investigate the biological function affected by F. nucleatum infection. The biological functions were visualized according to p-value <.05 and |log2FC| ≥ 1.0 (Figures 2E,F; Supplementary Table S2). Surprisingly, there were some biological functions that we were interested in. As shown in Figure 2E, we found that “GO_SUCCINATE_METABOLIC_PROCESS” was downregulated and “GO_REGULATION_OF_ACTIVATION_INDUCED_CELL_DEATH_OF_T_CELLS”, “GO_REGULATION_OF_MAST_CELL_CYTOKINE_PRODUCTION”, and “GO_REGULATION_OF_NK_T_CELL_PROLIFERATION” were upregulated in GSE90944. In GSE141805 (Figure 2F), “TIAN_TNF_SIGNALING_VIA_NFKB” and “GO_CCR6_CHEMOKINE_RECEPTOR_BINDING” were upregulated, and “GO_COENZYME_A_METABOLIC_PROCESS” and “GO_CELLULAR_RESPONSE_TO_CISPLATIN” were downregulated. The enrichment biological functions highlighted the crucial role of tumor immunity in F. nucleatum-related colorectal cancer.
FIGURE 1. Flow diagram of the present study.
FIGURE 2. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and biological functions affected by F. nucleatum. (A, B) Volcano plots of DEGs influenced by F. nucleatum infection. Red dots represent upregulated genes, while blue dots represent downregulated genes. DEGs were selected based on p-value <.05 and |log2FC| ≥ 1. Heat maps of the top 50 DEGs (C, D) and biological functions (E, F) between F. nucleatum-infected and uninfected colorectal cancer cells.
CCL22 Plays a Crucial Role in Colorectal Cancer Cells Infected by F. nucleatum
To explore the relationship between F. nucleatum and immunity, we intersected DEGs of the two datasets with IRGs, and a total of six genes remained, including BIRC3, CCL22, CPT1B, ELMO1, PLA2G4C, and SLC25A2 (Figure 3A). Among them, CCL22, BIRC3A, and CPT1B were significantly upregulated under F. nucleatum treatment in two datasets. To further determine the meaningful genes, we performed K–M analysis according to the high- and low-expression subgroups of each DE IRG in TCGA (Figures 3B–G) and GSE90944 (Supplementary Figure S1). Interestingly, CCL22 (p = .011) and CTP1B (p = .021) were selected as meaningful genes in patients of TCGA COAD (Figures 3B,C), but only CCL22 was validated in GSE39582 (Figure 3H), with p = .014. CCL22 was differentially expressed in the subgroup analyses according to tumor M stage in TCGA COAD (Figure 3I). By reviewing the literatures, we found that the upregulation of CCL22 played an important role in bacterial and viral infection-associated tumors (Yang et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2018). Hence, we identified CCL22 for further study.
FIGURE 3. The meaningful immune-related (IR) differentially expressed genes (DEGs) influenced by F. nucleatum. (A) Venn diagram showing the common genes in GSE90944, GSE141805, and immune-related genes. (B–G) Kaplan–Meier survival plots of the IR DEGs in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) colon adenocarcinoma (COAD). (H) Kaplan–Meier survival plot of CCL22 in GSE39582. (I) Box plot of CCL22 expression between M0 and M1 stages in TCGA COAD.
CCL22 Associated With Immune-Related Biological Functions
To dissect the biological functions of CCL22, we identified the top 100 associated genes of CCL22 in COAD using the GEPIA database, followed by KEGG pathway enrichment analysis and GO functional enrichment analysis (Supplementary Table S3). As shown in Figure 4A, the significantly enriched GO (ALL) terms included “T cell activation”, “regulation of leukocyte cell−cell adhesion”, and “lymphocyte proliferation”, which indicated the role of CCL22 in regulating the immune function. The detailed information of GO (BP, CC, and MF) terms are shown in Supplementary Figure S2. The enriched KEGG pathways were as follows: “cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction”, “chemokine signaling pathway”, “intestinal immune network for IgA production”, and “inflammatory bowel disease”, indicating the potential role of CCL22 in gastrointestinal diseases (Figure 4B). Interestingly, we also found that the “NF-kappa B signaling pathway” was related to CCL22, which suggested a potential relationship among NF-kappa B signaling pathway, F. nucleatum, and CCL22. In addition, GSEA revealed that GO functions, such as cell–cell signaling by WNT, B cell differentiation, and chemokine production, were markedly enriched in the high-CCL22-expression subgroup (Figure 4C). As for the KEGG pathways, GSEA showed that B cell receptor, chemokine, JAK STAT, and the MAPK signaling pathway were enriched in the high-CCL22-expression subgroup (Figure 4D; Supplementary Table S4).
FIGURE 4. Biological function analysis of CCL22. Representative Gene Ontology (GO) functions (A) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways (B) of the top 100 genes with expression similar to CCL22. Representative Gene Set Enrichment Analysis results of GO functions (C) and KEGG pathways (D) based on MSigDB.
CCL22 Modulates the Tumor Microenvironment in TCGA COAD
Studies have shown that chemokines recruited immune cells into tumor beds and influenced the TME (Marques et al., 2019). To explore whether CCL22 regulated the TME of COAD, ESTIMATE analysis was used to calculate the immune/stromal/estimate score and tumor purity of each patient. We excitedly found that the immune/stromal/estimate scores (Figures 5A–C) were significantly higher, while tumor purity (Figure 5D) was significantly lower in the high-CCL22-expression subgroup compared to the low-CCL22-expression subgroup, which suggested that CCL22 was closely related to TME. Then, TPM value was applied to the CIBERSORT algorithm to further determine the composition of immune cells in TCGA COAD tissues with a different CCL22 expression status. We found that CCL22 was positively associated with Treg (p < .001), naive B cells (p < .05), activated dendritic cells (p < .01), neutrophils (p < .01), and T follicular helper cell (p < .05), while it was negatively associated with activated NK cells (p < .05) and monocytes (p < .001) in COAD, as shown in Figure 5E.
FIGURE 5. Tumor microenvironment changes associated with CCL22 in The Cancer Genome Atlas colon adenocarcinoma. (A) The immune score, (B) stromal score, (C) estimated score, and (D) tumor purity and (E) the proportion of 22 types of infiltrating immune cells in high- and low-CCL22-expression subgroups.
CCL22 Related to Immune Checkpoint Therapy
Studies have shown that the TME is closely related to the efficacy of immune checkpoint therapy (Tumeh et al., 2014; Hegde et al., 2016). To explore whether CCL22 was also associated with immune checkpoint therapy in COAD, the correlations between CCL22 and immune checkpoint molecules were analyzed (Kim et al., 2017; Nishino et al., 2017; Zhai et al., 2018). As shown in Figure 6A, we found that CCL22 was positively related to BTLA, CTLA4, TIGIT, HAVCR2, CD274, PDCD1, and LAG3 (correlation value = 0.38, 0.54, 0.51, 0.4, 0.24, 0.29, and 0.2; all p-value <.05). As shown in Figure 6B, CCL22 expression was positively correlated with cytotoxic genes, such as TNFSF11, GZMA, IFNG, PRF1, GZMK, and GZMM (correlation value = 0.31, 0.21, 0.18, 0.23, 0.32, and 0.35; all p-value <.05). It has been reported that IPS is a predictor of response to ICIs based on the TCGA data. To explore the relationship between CCL22 and IPS, the IPS of TCGA COAD was downloaded from the TCIA website. Although there was no statistical difference in IPS-PD1/PD-L1/PD-L2 score and IPS-CTLA4 score between the high- and low-CCL22-expression subgroups (Figures 6D,E), the high-CCL22-expression subgroup had a statistically higher IPS-CTLA4 and PD1/PD-L1/PD-L2 score (Figure 6C).
FIGURE 6. Relationship between CCL22 expression and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. (A) The correlation between CCL22 expression and immune checkpoint genes and (B) cytotoxic genes. Red is positive, and blue is negative. The symbol “x” represented a p-value >.05, and the circles without “x” meant p-value <.05. The numbers in the circle represented the correlation value. Box plots showing the association between (C) IPS-CTLA4 and PD1/PD-L1/PD-L2, (D) IPS-CTLA4, and (E) IPS-PD1/PD-L1/PD-L2 scores and CCL22 expression in patients of The Cancer Genome Atlas colon adenocarcinoma.
CCL22 Associated With APC and KRAS Mutation in TCGA COAD
Firstly, we explored the mutation status of CCL22 using the Gene_Mutation module of TIMER 2.0 website. As shown in Figure 7B, only 2 of the 406 samples had CCL22 mutation in COAD, much lower than APC mutation (286 of the 406 samples) and KRAS mutation (174 of the 406 samples), which are shown in Supplementary Figure S3. The top four mutation genes in COAD were APC, TP53, TTN, and KRAS (Figure 7A). The mutation of the above-mentioned genes was closely related to colorectal tumorigenesis. Although there was no difference in TMB between the high- and low-CCL22-expression subgroups (Figure 7C), we were surprised to find that the expression of CCL22 was significantly decreased in the APC and KRAS mutation groups in the Gene_Mutation module of TIMER2.0 website (Figure 7D). This strongly supported the idea that CCL22 might play an important role in colorectal tumorigenesis.
FIGURE 7. Mutation landscape related to CCL22 in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) colon adenocarcinoma (COAD). (A) Oncoplot showing the top 10 mutational genes in TCGA COAD). (B) Mutation status of CCL22 in different cancer types. (C) Relationship between CCL22 expression and tumor mutation burden in TCGA COAD. (D) Violin plots showing the CCL22 expression in mutant and wild groups of APC and KRAS.
Discussion
Mounting evidence supports that gut microbiota has a profound influence on the effectiveness of tumor immunotherapy (Vétizou et al., 2015; Gopalakrishnan et al., 2018)—for example, Enterococcus hirae and Barnesiella intestinihominis enhance cyclophosphamide-induced therapeutic immunomodulatory effects (Daillère et al., 2016). Besides this, Akkermansia muciniphila can specifically facilitate the effect of PD-1-based immunotherapy by recruiting T lymphocytes into the tumor beds (Routy et al., 2018), thus suggesting the enormous potential of gut microbiota in regulating the TME and influencing antitumor immune. As one of the most crucial bacteria related to CRC, F. nucleatum can influence colorectal tumorigenesis directly by increasing myeloid-derived suppressor cells, inhibiting receptors of NK cells, and controlling T-cell-mediated immune responses (Kostic et al., 2013; Mima et al., 2016; Dong et al., 2020; Serna et al., 2020). The molecular mechanisms underlying the interactions between F. nucleatum and the TME or immunotherapy are deemed to be further investigated.
In the present research, we firstly analyzed the gene expression and biological functions between F. nucleatum-infected and uninfected CRC cell lines. In total, 589 and 752 DEGs were respectively obtained in the GSE141805 and GSE90944 datasets. We found that F. nucleatum upregulated “TIAN_TNF_SIGNALING_VIA_NFKB”. Studies showed that the activation of NF-kappaB induced by F. nucleatum participated in metastasis, proliferation, and chemoresistance to 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) in CRC (Yang et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2020). The downregulation of “GO_CELLULAR_RESPONSE_TO_CISPLATIN” suggested that F. nucleatum may contribute to chemoresistance to oxaliplatin in CRC, and Hong et al. pointed out that F. nucleatum promoted carcinogenesis via increasing CRC cell glucose metabolism (Hong et al., 2020). According to our analysis, “GO_COENZYME_A_METABOLIC_PROCESS” and “GO_SUCCINATE_METABOLIC_PROCESS” may also be potential mechanisms of colorectal carcinogenesis induced by F. nucleatum. What is more, “GO_REGULATION_OF_ACTIVATION_INDUCED_CELL_DEATH_OF_T_CELLS”, “GO_REGULATION_OF_MAST_CELL_CYTOKINE_PRODUCTION”, and “GO_REGULATION_OF_NK_T_CELL_PROLIFERATION” were upregulated. The enrichment biological functions also highlighted the crucial role of tumor immunity in F. nucleatum-related CRC, which has been validated in many studies (Kostic et al., 2013; Mima et al., 2015; Hamada et al., 2018).
Modulating tumor immunity was considered to be the most promising treatment for tumor, so we further dissected the effect of F. nucleatum on tumor immunity. By intersecting with IRGs, we finally obtained six DE IRGs, including BIRC3, CCL22, CPT1B, ELMO1, PLA2G4C, and SLC25A2. Surprisingly, BIRC3 was reported to upregulate after F. nucleatum infection and promote chemoresistance to 5-Fu in CRC (Zhang et al., 2019), which suggested the reliability of our analysis. Furthermore, the survival analysis showed that CCL22 was significantly related to the OS and M stages of CRC patients in TCGA COAD. The prognostic power of CCL22 was also validated in GSE39582. Hence, we identified CCL22 for further study, and GO and KEGG analysis showed that CCL22 were mainly related to immune-related functions. Interestingly, we found that “NF-kappa B signaling pathway” was related to CCL22, which was also induced by F. nucleatum infection. This evidence suggested the potential relationships among NF-kappa B signaling pathway, F. nucleatum, and CCL22.
It has been reported that CCL22, a member of the chemokine family, can recruit immune cells to rewire the TME via binding to CCR4 (Rapp et al., 2019). Our study found that the high-CCL22-expression subgroup had a higher immune/stromal/estimate score and lower tumor purity. The high-CCL22-expression subgroup with a markedly higher immune score suggested more immune cell infiltration. Further analysis of the proportion of various immune cells indicated that the high-CCL22-expression subgroup had more immune-suppressive cells (such as Tregs and T follicular helper cells) and less antitumor immune cells (such as activated NK cells). It seemed that CCL22 induced the immune-suppressive TME to promote colorectal tumorigenesis, and it might be a potential target for F. nucleatum to affect the TME.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors show great potential in multiple cancers, such as melanoma, bladder cancer, and prostate cancer (Topalian et al., 2012). However, in CRC, only MSI-H patients (Ganesh et al., 2019), a small proportion of CRC, benefit from ICIs. Our study discovered that the CCL22 mRNA expression was positively correlated with immune checkpoint molecules and cytotoxic genes (Garzón-Tituaña et al., 2020), which were reported to influence the functions of immunocytes (Garzón-Tituaña et al., 2020; Cao et al., 2021). These clues indicated that high-CCL22-expression patients may have a better response to ICIs. It has been reported that IPS was a predictor of response to ICIs based on the TCGA data. A higher IPS score predicted better response to ICIs (Yan et al., 2021). In the present study, we found that the high-CCL22-expression subgroup had statistically higher IPS-CTLA4 and PD1/PD-L1/PD-L2 scores, which also suggested that high-CCL22-expression patients had a better response to the CTLA4 and PD1/PD-L1/PD-L2 combination therapy. Surprisingly, Rapp et al. also pointed out that the CCL22–CCR4 axis may serve as an immune checkpoint and was important for inhibiting T cell immunity (Rapp et al., 2019). Klarquist et al. found that the vaccination of CCL22 led to redirecting Treg away from tumors, and the repetitive vaccination with CCL22 sufficiently limited Treg accumulation and tumor growth in animals, which carried the potential of local vaccination of CCL22 to enhance the therapeutic effect of ICIs (Klarquist et al., 2016). All of these highlighted the potential role of CCL22 in ICIs.
TMB, defined as the total number of non-synonymous mutations in the coding regions of genes, has been reported as an effective predictor of response to ICIs (Sen et al., 2019). In patients of TCGA COAD, we did not find a statistically different TMB between the high- and low-CCL22-expression subgroups. However, the expression of CCL22 was higher in the KRAS and APC mutation groups compared to the KRAS and APC wild groups. APC and KRAS are the most predominant mutation genes closely associated with colorectal tumorigenesis (Fearon, 2011). In addition, APC mutation was used to construct a spontaneous tumorigenesis mice model of CRC in biological experiments (Moser et al., 1995; Yamada and Mori, 2007), which implied the potential role of CCL22 in colorectal tumorigenesis.
There were still some limitations in our study. On the one hand, experiments in vitro and in vivo were lacking, and further QPCR and Western blot were needed to verify the expression of CCL22 as well as of other differentially expressed genes (BIRC3, CPT1B, ELMO1, PLA2G4C, and SLC25A2) in CRC cell lines infected by F. nucleatum. The effective impact of F. nucleatum-induced expression of CCL22 on colorectal tumorigenesis also needed to be validated in the future. On the other hand, the ability of CCL22 and other differentially expressed genes to predict survival needed to be further validated in multicenter clinical samples. Nevertheless, we found that many literatures have suggested the crucial role of CCL22 in F. nucleatum-related colorectal tumorigenesis. First, it has been reported that CCL22 expression is elevated in colorectal cancer (Wågsäter et al., 2008; Huang et al., 2015). Gut microbiota infection can induce the expression of some chemokines, including CCL22, in colorectal cancer (Cremonesi et al., 2018). What is more, one study showed that the loss of miR-34a can increase CCL22 expression and promote the development of colorectal cancer after an infection by the bacterium Citrobacter, while the NF-KB signaling pathway also plays an important role in the development of colorectal cancer (Wang et al., 2018). Our analysis showed that F. nucleatum infection could increase CCL22 expression and influence the NF-KB signaling pathway in two kinds of colorectal cancer cells. Moreover, CCL22 was also related to NF-KB signaling pathway in TCGA-COAD. In summary, it is reasonable to conclude that F. nucleatum can also increase CCL22 expression, thereby promoting colorectal tumorigenesis, and the NF-KB signaling pathway is a part of its mechanism.
In summary, our study found that CCL22 mRNA expression was upregulated in CRC cell lines infected by F. nucleatum. The upregulation of CCL22 was associated with the TME of COAD, in which the high-CCL22-expression subgroup had more immune-suppressive cells and less antitumor immune cells. The high-CCL22-expression subgroup possessed higher IPS-CTLA4 and PD1/PD-L1/PD-L2 scores. This study provides several supporting lines of evidence that highlight the critical role of CCL22 in F. nucleatum-related colorectal tumorigenesis and its close relationship with the TME and ICIs, which deserved further cell and animal experiments.
Data Availability Statement
The original data presented in the study are included in GEO and TCGA websites (Table 1). Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Author Contributions
HW conceived and designed the study, analyzed the data, wrote the manuscript, and generated the figures and tables. KL, ZG, ZL, and JX helped to analyze the data. SO, YT, SR, JY, TM, TQ, and ZZ helped to search for some relevant papers for this research. YJ, YS, and RH guided the research process. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81872034), the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (no. H2017016), the Wu Jieping Medical Foundation (no. 320.6750.19092-41), and the Chen Xiao-ping Foundation for the Development of Science and Technology of Hubei Province (no. CXPJJH12000002-2020025).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank everyone who takes part in this study.
Supplementary Material
The supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2022.811900/full#supplementary-material
References
Anz, D., Rapp, M., Eiber, S., Koelzer, V. H., Thaler, R., Haubner, S., et al. (2015). Suppression of Intratumoral CCL22 by Type I Interferon Inhibits Migration of Regulatory T Cells and Blocks Cancer Progression. Cancer Res. 75 (21), 4483–4493. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-3499
Arce Vargas, F., Furness, A. J. S., Litchfield, K., Joshi, K., Rosenthal, R., Ghorani, E., et al. (2018). Fc Effector Function Contributes to the Activity of Human Anti-CTLA-4 Antibodies. Cancer Cell 33 (4), 649–e4. doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2018.02.010
Böttcher, J. P., Bonavita, E., Chakravarty, P., Blees, H., Cabeza-Cabrerizo, M., Sammicheli, S., et al. (2018). NK Cells Stimulate Recruitment of cDC1 into the Tumor Microenvironment Promoting Cancer Immune Control. Cell 172 (5), 1022–1037. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.004
Cabrero-de Las Heras, S., and Martínez-Balibrea, E. (2018). CXC Family of Chemokines as Prognostic or Predictive Biomarkers and Possible Drug Targets in Colorectal Cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 24 (42), 4738–4749. doi:10.3748/wjg.v24.i42.4738
Cao, Y., Jiao, N., Sun, T., Ma, Y., Zhang, X., Chen, H., et al. (2021). CXCL11 Correlates with Antitumor Immunity and an Improved Prognosis in Colon Cancer. Front. Cel Dev. Biol. 9, 646252. doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.646252
Charoentong, P., Finotello, F., Angelova, M., Mayer, C., Efremova, M., Rieder, D., et al. (2017). Pan-cancer Immunogenomic Analyses Reveal Genotype-Immunophenotype Relationships and Predictors of Response to Checkpoint Blockade. Cel Rep. 18 (1), 248–262. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.019
Chen, S., Su, T., Zhang, Y., Lee, A., He, J., Ge, Q., et al. (2020). Fusobacterium Nucleatum Promotes Colorectal Cancer Metastasis by Modulating KRT7-AS/KRT7. Gut Microbes 11 (3), 511–525. doi:10.1080/19490976.2019.1695494
Colaprico, A., Silva, T. C., Olsen, C., Garofano, L., Cava, C., Garolini, D., et al. (2016). TCGAbiolinks: an R/Bioconductor Package for Integrative Analysis of TCGA Data. Nucleic Acids Res. 44 (8), e71. doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1507
Cremonesi, E., Governa, V., Garzon, J. F. G., Mele, V., Amicarella, F., Muraro, M. G., et al. (2018). Gut Microbiota Modulate T Cell Trafficking into Human Colorectal Cancer. Gut 67 (11), 1984–1994. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313498
Daillère, R., Vétizou, M., Waldschmitt, N., Yamazaki, T., Isnard, C., Poirier-Colame, V., et al. (2016). Enterococcus Hirae and Barnesiella Intestinihominis Facilitate Cyclophosphamide-Induced Therapeutic Immunomodulatory Effects. Immunity 45 (4), 931–943. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2016.09.009
Dong, X., Pan, P., Zheng, D. W., Bao, P., Zeng, X., and Zhang, X. Z. (2020). Bioinorganic Hybrid Bacteriophage for Modulation of Intestinal Microbiota to Remodel Tumor-Immune Microenvironment against Colorectal Cancer. Sci. Adv. 6 (20), eaba1590. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba1590
Fearon, E. R. (2011). Molecular Genetics of Colorectal Cancer. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 6, 479–507. doi:10.1146/annurev-pathol-011110-130235
Galon, J., Costes, A., Sanchez-Cabo, F., Kirilovsky, A., Mlecnik, B., Lagorce-Pagès, C., et al. (2006). Type, Density, and Location of Immune Cells within Human Colorectal Tumors Predict Clinical Outcome. Science 313 (5795), 1960–1964. doi:10.1126/science.1129139
Ganesh, K., Stadler, Z. K., Cercek, A., Mendelsohn, R. B., Shia, J., Segal, N. H., et al. (2019). Immunotherapy in Colorectal Cancer: Rationale, Challenges and Potential. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 16 (6), 361–375. doi:10.1038/s41575-019-0126-x
Garris, C. S., Arlauckas, S. P., Kohler, R. H., Trefny, M. P., Garren, S., Piot, C., et al. (2018). Successful Anti-PD-1 Cancer Immunotherapy Requires T Cell-Dendritic Cell Crosstalk Involving the Cytokines IFN-γ and IL-12. Immunity 49 (6), 1148–1161. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2018.09.024
Garzón-Tituaña, M., Arias, M. A., Sierra-Monzón, J. L., Morte-Romea, E., Santiago, L., Ramirez-Labrada, A., et al. (2020). The Multifaceted Function of Granzymes in Sepsis: Some Facts and a Lot to Discover. Front. Immunol. 11, 1054. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.01054
Gopalakrishnan, V., Helmink, B. A., Spencer, C. N., Reuben, A., and Wargo, J. A. (2018). The Influence of the Gut Microbiome on Cancer, Immunity, and Cancer Immunotherapy. Cancer Cell 33 (4), 570–580. doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2018.03.015
Guo, X., Zhang, Y., Zheng, L., Zheng, C., Song, J., Zhang, Q., et al. (2018). Global Characterization of T Cells in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer by Single-Cell Sequencing. Nat. Med. 24 (7), 978–985. doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0045-3
Hamada, T., Zhang, X., Mima, K., Bullman, S., Sukawa, Y., Nowak, J. A., et al. (2018). Fusobacterium Nucleatum in Colorectal Cancer Relates to Immune Response Differentially by Tumor Microsatellite Instability Status. Cancer Immunol. Res. 6 (11), 1327–1336. doi:10.1158/2326-6066.cir-18-0174
Hänzelmann, S., Castelo, R., and Guinney, J. (2013). GSVA: Gene Set Variation Analysis for Microarray and RNA-Seq Data. BMC Bioinformatics 14, 7. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-7
Heeran, A. B., Dunne, M. R., Morrissey, M. E., Buckley, C. E., Clarke, N., Cannon, A., et al. (2021). The Protein Secretome Is Altered in Rectal Cancer Tissue Compared to Normal Rectal Tissue, and Alterations in the Secretome Induce Enhanced Innate Immune Responses. Cancers (Basel) 13 (3)–571. doi:10.3390/cancers13030571
Hegde, P. S., Karanikas, V., and Evers, S. (2016). The where, the when, and the How of Immune Monitoring for Cancer Immunotherapies in the Era of Checkpoint Inhibition. Clin. Cancer Res. 22 (8), 1865–1874. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-1507
Hong, J., Guo, F., Lu, S. Y., Shen, C., Ma, D., Zhang, X., et al. (2020). F Nucleatum Targets lncRNA ENO1-IT1 to Promote Glycolysis and Oncogenesis in Colorectal Cancer[J]. Gut 70, 2123–2137. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322780
Huang, Y.-H., Cao, Y.-F., Jiang, Z.-Y., Zhang, S., and Gao, F. (2015). Th22 Cell Accumulation is Associated with Colorectal Cancer Development. World J. Gastroenterol. 21 (14), 4216–4224. doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i14.4216
Kim, J. E., Patel, M. A., Mangraviti, A., Kim, E. S., Theodros, D., Velarde, E., et al. (2017). Combination Therapy with Anti-PD-1, Anti-TIM-3, and Focal Radiation Results in Regression of Murine Gliomas. Clin. Cancer Res. 23 (1), 124–136. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-1535
Klarquist, J., Tobin, K., Farhangi Oskuei, P., Henning, S. W., Fernandez, M. F., Dellacecca, E. R., et al. (2016). Ccl22 Diverts T Regulatory Cells and Controls the Growth of Melanoma. Cancer Res. 76 (21), 6230–6240. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-0618
Kostic, A. D., Chun, E., Robertson, L., Glickman, J. N., Gallini, C. A., Michaud, M., et al. (2013). Fusobacterium Nucleatum Potentiates Intestinal Tumorigenesis and Modulates the Tumor-Immune Microenvironment. Cell Host & Microbe 14 (2), 207–215. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.07.007
Li, T., Fu, J., Zeng, Z., Cohen, D., Li, J., Chen, Q., et al. (2020). TIMER2.0 for Analysis of Tumor-Infiltrating Immune Cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 48 (W1), W509–W514. doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa407
Marques, P., Barry, S., Carlsen, E., Collier, D., Ronaldson, A., Awad, S., et al. (2019). Chemokines Modulate the Tumour Microenvironment in Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumours. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 7 (1), 172. doi:10.1186/s40478-019-0830-3
Martinenaite, E., Munir Ahmad, S., Hansen, M., Met, Ö., Westergaard, M. W., Larsen, S. K., et al. (2016). CCL22-specific T Cells: Modulating the Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment. Oncoimmunology 5 (11), e1238541. doi:10.1080/2162402x.2016.1238541
Mayakonda, A., Lin, D.-C., Assenov, Y., Plass, C., and Koeffler, H. P. (2018). Maftools: Efficient and Comprehensive Analysis of Somatic Variants in Cancer. Genome Res. 28 (11), 1747–1756. doi:10.1101/gr.239244.118
Mima, K., Nishihara, R., Qian, Z. R., Cao, Y., Sukawa, Y., Nowak, J. A., et al. (2016). Fusobacterium Nucleatumin Colorectal Carcinoma Tissue and Patient Prognosis. Gut 65 (12), 1973–1980. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310101
Mima, K., Sukawa, Y., Nishihara, R., Qian, Z. R., Yamauchi, M., Inamura, K., et al. (2015). Fusobacterium Nucleatumand T Cells in Colorectal Carcinoma. JAMA Oncol. 1 (5), 653–661. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.1377
Moser, A. R., Luongo, C., Gould, K. A., McNeley, M. K., Shoemaker, A. R., and Dove, W. F. (1995). ApcMin: a Mouse Model for Intestinal and Mammary Tumorigenesis. Eur. J. Cancer 31A (7-8), 1061–1064. doi:10.1016/0959-8049(95)00181-h
Nazemalhosseini-Mojarad, E., Mohammadpour, S., Torshizi Esafahani, A., Gharib, E., Larki, P., Moradi, A., et al. (2019). Intratumoral Infiltrating Lymphocytes Correlate with Improved Survival in Colorectal Cancer Patients: Independent of Oncogenetic Features. J. Cel Physiol 234 (4), 4768–4777. doi:10.1002/jcp.27273
Newman, A. M., Liu, C. L., Green, M. R., Gentles, A. J., Feng, W., Xu, Y., et al. (2015). Robust Enumeration of Cell Subsets from Tissue Expression Profiles. Nat. Methods 12 (5), 453–457. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3337
Nishino, M., Ramaiya, N. H., Hatabu, H., and Hodi, F. S. (2017). Monitoring Immune-Checkpoint Blockade: Response Evaluation and Biomarker Development. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 14 (11), 655–668. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.88
Quail, D. F., and Joyce, J. A. (2013). Microenvironmental Regulation of Tumor Progression and Metastasis. Nat. Med. 19 (11), 1423–1437. doi:10.1038/nm.3394
Rapp, M., Wintergerst, M. W. M., Kunz, W. G., Vetter, V. K., Knott, M. M. L., Lisowski, D., et al. (2019). CCL22 Controls Immunity by Promoting Regulatory T Cell Communication with Dendritic Cells in Lymph Nodes. J. Exp. Med. 216 (5), 1170–1181. doi:10.1084/jem.20170277
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J., and Smyth, G. K. (2010). edgeR: a Bioconductor Package for Differential Expression Analysis of Digital Gene Expression Data. Bioinformatics 26 (1), 139–140. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616
Routy, B., Le Chatelier, E., Derosa, L., Duong, C. P. M., Alou, M. T., Daillère, R., et al. (2018). Gut Microbiome Influences Efficacy of PD-1-Based Immunotherapy against Epithelial Tumors. Science 359 (6371), 91–97. doi:10.1126/science.aan3706
Sen, T., Rodriguez, B. L., Chen, L., Corte, C. M. D., Morikawa, N., Fujimoto, J., et al. (2019). Targeting DNA Damage Response Promotes Antitumor Immunity through STING-Mediated T-Cell Activation in Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancer Discov. 9 (5), 646–661. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-18-1020
Serna, G., Ruiz-Pace, F., Hernando, J., Alonso, L., Fasani, R., Landolfi, S., et al. (2020). Fusobacterium Nucleatum Persistence and Risk of Recurrence after Preoperative Treatment in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Ann. Oncol. 31 (10), 1366–1375. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.003
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., Goding Sauer, A., Fedewa, S. A., Butterly, L. F., Anderson, J. C., et al. (2020). Colorectal Cancer Statistics, 2020. CA A. Cancer J. Clin. 70 (3), 145–164. doi:10.3322/caac.21601
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., and Jemal, A. (2020). Cancer Statistics, 2020. CA A. Cancer J. Clin. 70 (1), 7–30. doi:10.3322/caac.21590
Stankovic, B., Bjørhovde, H. A. K., Skarshaug, R., Aamodt, H., Frafjord, A., Müller, E., et al. (2018). Immune Cell Composition in Human Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Front. Immunol. 9, 3101. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.03101
Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., et al. (2005). Gene Set Enrichment Analysis: A Knowledge-Based Approach for Interpreting Genome-wide Expression Profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102 (43), 15545–15550. doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102
Sun, H., Wang, Y., Jing, H.-Y., Yang, X.-Y., Shi, X.-X., Zhang, J.-H., et al. (2021). Chaperonin-Containing TCP1 Subunit 6A Is a Prognostic Potential Biomarker that Correlates with the Presence of Immune Infiltrates in Colorectal Cancer. Front. Genet. 12, 629856. doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.629856
Tang, Z., Li, C., Kang, B., Gao, G., Li, C., and Zhang, Z. (2017). GEPIA: a Web Server for Cancer and normal Gene Expression Profiling and Interactive Analyses. Nucleic Acids Res. 45 (W1), W98–W102. doi:10.1093/nar/gkx247
Topalian, S. L., Hodi, F. S., Brahmer, J. R., Gettinger, S. N., Smith, D. C., McDermott, D. F., et al. (2012). Safety, Activity, and Immune Correlates of Anti-PD-1 Antibody in Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 366 (26), 2443–2454. doi:10.1056/nejmoa1200690
Tumeh, P. C., Harview, C. L., Yearley, J. H., Shintaku, I. P., Taylor, E. J. M., Robert, L., et al. (2014). PD-1 Blockade Induces Responses by Inhibiting Adaptive Immune Resistance. Nature 515 (7528), 568–571. doi:10.1038/nature13954
Vétizou, M., Pitt, J. M., Daillère, R., Lepage, P., Waldschmitt, N., Flament, C., et al. (2015). Anticancer Immunotherapy by CTLA-4 Blockade Relies on the Gut Microbiota. Science 350 (6264), 1079–1084. doi:10.1126/science.aad1329
Wågsäter, D., Dienus, O., Löfgren, S., Hugander, A., and Dimberg, J. (2008). Quantification of the Chemokines CCL17 and CCL22 in Human Colorectal Adenocarcinomas. Mol. Med. Rep. 1 (2), 211–217. doi:10.3892/mmr.1.2.211
Wang, L., Wang, E., Wang, Y., Mines, R., Xiang, K., Sun, Z., et al. (2018). miR-34a Is a microRNA Safeguard for Citrobacter-Induced Inflammatory colon Oncogenesis[J]. Elife 7, e39479. doi:10.7554/elife.39479
Wood, S. L., Pernemalm, M., Crosbie, P. A., and Whetton, A. D. (2014). The Role of the Tumor-Microenvironment in Lung Cancer-Metastasis and its Relationship to Potential Therapeutic Targets. Cancer Treat. Rev. 40 (4), 558–566. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.10.001
Yamada, Y., and Mori, H. (2007). Multistep Carcinogenesis of the colon in ApcMin/+mouse. Cancer Sci. 98 (1), 6–10. doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2006.00348.x
Yan, T., Ma, G., Wang, K., Liu, W., Zhong, W., and Du, J. (2021). The Immune Heterogeneity between Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Analysis Based on lncRNA Model. Front. Immunol. 12, 547333. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.547333
Yang, P., Li, Q.-J., Feng, Y., Zhang, Y., Markowitz, G. J., Ning, S., et al. (2012). TGF-β-miR-34a-CCL22 Signaling-Induced Treg Cell Recruitment Promotes Venous Metastases of HBV-Positive Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancer Cell 22 (3), 291–303. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2012.07.023
Yang, Y., Weng, W., Peng, J., Hong, L., Yang, L., Toiyama, Y., et al. (2017). Fusobacterium Nucleatum Increases Proliferation of Colorectal Cancer Cells and Tumor Development in Mice by Activating Toll-like Receptor 4 Signaling to Nuclear Factor−κB, and Up-Regulating Expression of MicroRNA-21. Gastroenterology 152 (4), 851–866. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.11.018
Yoshihara, K., Shahmoradgoli, M., Martínez, E., Vegesna, R., Kim, H., Torres-Garcia, W., et al. (2013). Inferring Tumour Purity and Stromal and Immune Cell Admixture from Expression Data. Nat. Commun. 4, 2612. doi:10.1038/ncomms3612
Yu, G., Wang, L.-G., Han, Y., and He, Q.-Y. (2012). clusterProfiler: an R Package for Comparing Biological Themes Among Gene Clusters. OMICS: A J. Integr. Biol. 16 (5), 284–287. doi:10.1089/omi.2011.0118
Yu, G., Wu, Y., Wang, W., Xu, J., Lv, X., Cao, X., et al. (2019). Low-dose Decitabine Enhances the Effect of PD-1 Blockade in Colorectal Cancer with Microsatellite Stability by Re-modulating the Tumor Microenvironment. Cell Mol Immunol 16 (4), 401–409. doi:10.1038/s41423-018-0026-y
Yu, T., Guo, F., Yu, Y., Sun, T., Ma, D., Han, J., et al. (2017). Fusobacterium Nucleatum Promotes Chemoresistance to Colorectal Cancer by Modulating Autophagy. Cell 170 (3), 548–563. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.008
Zhai, L., Ladomersky, E., Lenzen, A., Nguyen, B., Patel, R., Lauing, K. L., et al. (2018). Ido1 in Cancer: a Gemini of Immune Checkpoints. Cel Mol Immunol 15 (5), 447–457. doi:10.1038/cmi.2017.143
Keywords: Fusobacterium nucleatum, tumor microenvironment, immune checkpoint therapy, chemokines, CCL22
Citation: Wang H, Luo K, Guan Z, Li Z, Xiang J, Ou S, Tao Y, Ran S, Ye J, Ma T, Qiao T, Zhang Z, Jin Y, Song Y and Huang R (2022) Identification of the Crucial Role of CCL22 in F. nucleatum-Related Colorectal Tumorigenesis that Correlates With Tumor Microenvironment and Immune Checkpoint Therapy. Front. Genet. 13:811900. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.811900
Received: 09 November 2021; Accepted: 11 January 2022;
Published: 28 February 2022.
Edited by:
Jaideep Banerjee, Smith & Nephew, United KingdomReviewed by:
Ehsan Nazemalhosseini-Mojarad, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, IranGraziella Curtale, The Scripps Research Institute, United States
Copyright © 2022 Wang, Luo, Guan, Li, Xiang, Ou, Tao, Ran, Ye, Ma, Qiao, Zhang, Jin, Song and Huang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Rui Huang, huangrui2019@163.com; Yanni Song, yannimd@126.com; Yinghu Jin, 33887443@qq.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship