- 1Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- 2Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
- 3Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
Background: Auditory neuropathy (AN) is a specific type of hearing loss characterized by impaired language comprehension. Apoptosis inducing factor mitochondrion associated 1 (AIFM1) is the most common gene associated with late-onset AN. In this study, we aimed to screen the pathogenic variant of AIFM1 in a Chinese family with AN and to explore the molecular mechanism underlying the function of such variant in the development of AN.
Methods: One patient with AN and eight unaffected individuals from a Chinese family were enrolled in this study. A comprehensive clinical evaluation was performed on all participants. A targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis of a total of 406 known deafness genes was performed to screen the potential pathogenic variants in the proband. Sanger sequencing was used to confirm the variants identified in all participants. The pathogenicity of variant was predicted by bioinformatics analysis. Immunofluorescence and Western blot analyses were performed to evaluate the subcellular distribution and expression of the wild type (WT) and mutant AIFM1 proteins. Cell apoptosis was evaluated based on the TUNEL analyses.
Results: Based on the clinical evaluations, the proband in this family was diagnosed with AN. The results of NGS and Sanger sequencing showed that a novel missense mutation of AIFM1, i.e., c.1367A > G (p. D456G), was identified in this family. Bioinformatics analysis indicated that this variant was pathogenic. Functional analysis showed that in comparison with the WT, the mutation c.1367A > G of AIFM1 showed no effect on its subcellular localization and the ability to induce apoptosis, but changed its protein expression level.
Conclusion: A novel variant of AIFM1 was identified for the first time, which was probably the genetic cause of AN in a Chinese family with AN.
Introduction
Auditory neuropathy (AN) is a type of auditory disorder mainly characterized by impaired speech comprehension ability, which manifests as a group of specific syndromes in audiology, also known as the auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) (Starr et al., 1996; El-Badry and McFadden, 2009; Talaat et al., 2009).
The pathophysiology of AN indicates that the outer hair cells show normal function, whereas the inner hair cells and auditory nerves as well as their synapses are dysfunctional. The clinical manifestations include: (1) the degree of impaired speech recognition rate is inconsistent with the degree of hearing impairment, and the word comprehension ability and speech discrimination ability are poor, especially in noisy environment (Elrharchi et al., 2020); (2) the audiological examination is characterized by normal cochlear microphonic (CM) and meaningful otoacoustic emission (OAEs), but the auditory brainstem response (ABR) waveform is either missing or illegible in the patient (Starr et al., 1996). Studies showed that the prevalence rate of AN in neonates is 0.009%, and about 6.5% of the congenital sensorineural hearing loss is caused by AN (Boudewyns et al., 2016). AN is also one of the refractory diseases leading to hearing and speech communication disorders in both infants and adolescents, accounting for 10% of permanent hearing loss in children (Chinese Multi-center Research Collaborative Group on Clinical Diagnosis and Intervention of Auditory Neuropathy, 2022).
According to the age of onset, cases of AN are divided into two groups, i.e., congenital AN and late-onset AN. Studies have shown that the etiology of AN is complex, with about 48% as idiopathic, 10% related to various factors, such as ototoxic drugs and metabolic, immune, and infectious factors, and about 42% as genetic (Moser and Starr, 2016). There are three types of inheritance pattern for AN: autosomal recessive, autosomal dominant, and X-linked recessive (Wang et al., 2020). To date, among the over 20 genes associated with AN, apoptosis inducing factor mitochondrion associated 1 (AIFM1) is considered as the most prevalent gene associated with the late-onset AN and X-linked recessive inheritance mode (Zong et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2020).
First cloned and named in 1999, AIFM1 is located in the Xq25-q26 region of human chromosomes (Susin et al., 1999). The AIFM1 gene is 36.471 kb in length, containing a total of 16 exons and encoding a 613-amino acid apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF). The AIF is a flavin protein with oxidoreductase activity, composed of two flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) domains, a nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) binding domain, a C-terminal domain with oxidoreductase activity, and a mitochondrial localization signal (MLS) at the N-terminal (Yuste et al., 2011). The AIFM1 has two main functions. First, it is involved in the caspase-independent death effect when mitochondria are transferred to nuclei under apoptosis stimulation, resulting in caspase-independent programmed cell death (Joza et al., 2001). Second, as a NADH oxidoreductase that is dependent on FAD, AIFM1 is crucial for oxidative phosphorylation, redox control, and respiratory chain activity in the organism (Ghezzi et al., 2010; Itai et al., 2011).
To date, a total of 19 AIFM1 variants have been identified as pathogenic factors for AN (https://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/; accessed on 03 October 2022). It is conceivable that there are other AIFM1 variants still remaining uncovered responsible for pathogenesis of AN. Therefore, in this study, we attempted to detect the pathogenic variants of AIFM1 in a Chinese family with AN enrolled in our hospital and to further investigate the effects of this variant on AN development.
Materials and methods
Subjects
One patient and eight unaffected individuals from a Chinese family as well as a total of 200 Chinese individuals with no genealogical relationships (i.e., controls) were included in this work. A comprehensive clinical evaluation, including the disease history and the audiological tests, was performed on all participants. The audiological tests included the pure tone threshold (PTA), distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE), auditory brainstem response (ABR), speech discrimination score (SDS), and auditory steady-state response (ASSR). The informed consent was signed by each participant prior to the clinical evaluation. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki with all procedures performed in accordance with the ethical standards of Shandong Provincial Hospital (Approval # SWYX: NO. 2021-511).
Targeted next-generation sequencing
The genomic DNA was extracted from 1 ml whole blood using the Genomic Blood DNA Extraction Kit (Axygen, San Francisco, CA, United States) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The proband’s DNA was diluted and then fragmented, ligated, amplified, and purified. GenCap® deafness gene capture probe V4.0 and GenCap® mitochondrial ring gene capture probe V1.0 (MyGenostics, Beijing, China) were used to capture the exon regions and the adjacent 20-bp intron regions of 406 genes of the proband. After elution, amplification, and purification, the captured regions were double-ended sequenced using Illumina HiSeq X TEN high-throughput sequencing platform (Illumina, United States). The detailed procedures of library preparation, sequencing, and bioinformatics analysis were described in our previous study (Xiao et al., 2016).
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and Sanger sequencing
PCR was performed in a 50-μl reaction mixture with the specific primers (forward primer 5′-TCCCTTTGTATGAAGCTAACTGG-3′ and reverse primer 5′-CCATTACAAGTGTTCTTTGAGCC-3′), as previously described (Bai et al., 2014). After the purification, the PCR products were sequenced by the ABI 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Scientific, Applied Biosystem, CA, United States). Nucleotide variations were identified by aligning the sequences with the AIFM1 available (GenBank accession NM_004208.4) using the Chrome software.
Pathogenicity assessment of AIFM1 variant
The harmfulness of variant was evaluated with pathogenicity prediction tools and databases, including REVEL (Ioannidis et al., 2016), SIFT (http://sift.jcvi.org/), PolyPhen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/), and Mutation Taster (http://www.mutationtaster.org/). The novelty of variant was determined by screening based on the 1000 Genomes (1000G) and Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) databases as well as the literature and publicly available databases, i.e., the Deafness Variation Database (DVD) (http://deafnessvariationdatabase.org/; accessed on 03 October 2022) and the ClinVar database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/; accessed on 03 October 2022).
A total of eight AIFM1 protein sequences of eight animal species, including Homo sapiens (O95831), Pan troglodytes (K7BTY6), Bos taurus (A0A4W2I7F3), Macaca mulatta (F7C728), Canis lupus familiaris (A0A8C0JLH6), Rattus norvegicus (Q9JM53), Mus musculus (Q9Z0X1), and Danio rerio (Q5XFY2), were downloaded from the UniProt database to perform the multiple sequence alignment by the Clustal Omega online tools (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/; accessed on 03 October 2022) to assess the conservation of the AIFM1 proteins.
Modeling analysis of AIFM1 protein structure
To determine the effects of AIFM1 variant on the protein structure, the 3-dimensional (3D) molecular structures of human wild type (WT) and mutant AIFM1 proteins were simulated using an automated homology modeling program I-TASSER (http://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/; accessed on 03 September 2022) with the protein structure visualized by Swiss-PdbViewer 4.1.
Cell culture
The Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Otology provided the HEK293 cells, which were cultured in the Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, United States) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, United States) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Macgene, Beijing, China) with 5% CO2 at 37°C.
Transient transfection and immunofluorescence analysis
The WT and mutant AIFM1 plasmids expressing GFP-tagged (pCMV3-C-GFPSpark) were synthesized by BioSune Biotech (Jinan, China). Sequences of WT and mutant AIFM1 plasmids were verified by Sanger sequencing. The HEK293 cells were planted onto the 24-well plates and grown to 60% confluence. The expression plasmids of WT and mutant AIFM1 were transfected into cells by using Lipofectamine 3000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, United States). In 48 h, the cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, washed thrice with PBS, and then incubated with DAPI (D9542, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States) for 10 min in dark. Finally, the samples were washed three times with PBS. After sealing, the samples were observed and imaged through a Leica TCS SP8 confocal fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems, Biberach, Germany). The relative fluorescence intensity was quantified with ImageJ software.
Western blot
Total protein was extracted from the HEK293 cells transfected with the WT and mutant AIFM1 plasmids. The proteins were denatured and separated by 10% SDS-PAGE electrophoresis and then transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (ISEQ00010, Merck Millipore, China). After blocking, the membranes were incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-GFP antibody (Proteintech, Wuhan, China) and mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin antibody (ZSGB-Bio, Beijing, China), and followed by anti-mouse IgG conjugated horseradish peroxidase (ZSGB-Bio, Beijing, China). Finally, the immunoblots were detected with an Immobilon Western HRP Substrate kit (WBKLS0100, Millipore, Schaffhausen, Switzerland) using the enhanced chemiluminescence system (Tanon5200, Shanghai, China). The gray scale of each band was quantified with ImageJ software and normalized by β-actin.
Tunel assay
The human HEK293 cells seeded in 24-well culture plates were transfected with plasmids of WT and mutant AIFM1 by using Lipofectamine 3000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, United States). In 48 h, the cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and permeabilized with proteinase K (20 μg/ml) at room temperature for 5 min. Each sample was stained with 50 μl TUNEL TdT Enzyme working solution (Meilunbio, Dalian, China) for 60 min at 37°C. The fluorescence intensity of the sample was detected with EX at 546 nm and EM at 570 nm.
Statistical analysis
Data presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three biological replicates for each experiment were analyzed using one-way ANOVA (nonparametric or mixed) with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test and two-tailed unpaired t-test by Graphpad Prism (V8.3.0). The significant difference was set at the two tailed p value less than 0.05.
Results
Participants and clinical evaluations
A total of nine members of a Chinese family were included in this study, including one affected (Ⅲ-2) and eight unaffected (Figure 1A). The proband Ⅲ-2 was a 21-year-old male and complained of hearing loss in both ears for 6 years, capable of hearing sounds but not clearly, with occasional tinnitus, which was more pronounced in noisy environments. The results of ABR showed that there was no significant waveform change observed in both ears of the proband with the stimulated of 96 db (Figure 1B). The PTA test results showed that the proband had low-frequency mild hearing loss in both ears (Figure 1C) with the SDS in the left and right ears of 45% and 43%, respectively, showing a disproportionate decline in pure tone hearing. The ASSR test showed that its threshold was significantly higher than that of PTA (Figure 1D). Notably, the DPOAE response was completely preserved (Figure 1E). These results of audiological tests indicated that the proband was presented with typical symptoms of AN.
FIGURE 1. Pedigree and clinical characteristics of the Chinese family diagnosed with auditory neuropathy (AN). (A) Pedigree of the Chinese family with AN. Individuals harboring hemizygous (–/o) or heterozygous (+/–) AIFM1 (c.1367A > G) mutation and WT (+/+) are indicated. The red arrow denotes the proband. The square indicates a male and the circle indicates a female. The hearing-impaired individual is indicated by a blackened square. (B) ABR thresholds of the proband. Red and blue lines represent the right and left ears, respectively. (C) PTA test of the proband. Red and blue lines represent the right and left ears, respectively. (D) ASSR thresholds of the proband. Red and blue lines represent the right and left ears, respectively. (E) DPOAE test results of the proband. Gray area indicates level of noise and the black line indicates the level of response.
Identification of a novel AIFM1 variant
The NGS analysis was performed based on the proband. The result showed that there was a base substitution (A to G) at position 1367 in the coding region of AIFM1 gene. Then, the candidate variant was confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Figure 2), showing that the proband carried the c.1367A > G hemizygous variant, the proband’s sister and mother had the c.1367A > G heterozygous variant, and the proband’s father did not have the variant, indicating that the variant of c.1367A > G came from the mother, and the WT allele came from the father. We then performed Sanger sequencing on other members of the family and found that the variant was co-segregated with the phenotypes of AN in this family (Figure 1A) with the X-linked recessive inheritance pattern in this family. The results of Sanger sequencing also showed that this variant was absent in the 200 controls. Furthermore, this variant was not detected in neither ExAC nor 1000G databases and was not reported in the literature and publicly available databases, i.e., the DVD and the ClinVar databases (Table 1). These results indicated that the novel variant of AIFM1, i.e., the missense mutation c.1367A > G, was identified in the proband of this Chinese family in this study.
FIGURE 2. Sanger sequencing chromatograms of the Chinese family diagnosed with auditory neuropathy. The red arrow indicates the location of the AIFM1 C.1367A > G variant.
TABLE1. Characteristics of AIFM1 variant, analysis of predicted protein structure and disease-causing effects based on various databases.
Bioinformatics analysis of the pathogenicity of the AIFM1 variant
The results of bioinformatics analysis showed that the variant c.1367A > G was predicted to be deleterious by REVEL, SIFT, Polyphen-2, and Mutation Taster (Table 1).
As showed in Figure 3A, the variant c.1367A > G was located in exon 13 of the FAD region of AIFM1, altering the triplet codon to substitute an aspartic (Asp, D, GAT) with the glycine (Gly, G, GGT) at position 456 (p. D456G). The results of the multiple sequence alignment showed that the AIFM1 p. D456G occurred at the evolutionarily highly conserved amino acids among eight species of vertebrates (Figure 3B). The 3D structures of WT and p. D456G AIFM1 were modeled based on the crystal structure of AIFM1 to reveal that compared with the WT, the structure of p. D456G AIFM1 protein was evidently changed (Figure 3C) with the polar, acidic amino acid Asp replaced by the non-polar amino acid Gly at position 456 and the secondary structure of the protein changed significantly posterior to the amino acid at position 456.
FIGURE 3. Molecular characteristics of AIFM1 variant. (A) Genomic and protein structures showing the locations of AIFM1 variant in exon 13 and the FAD domain indicated by the red arrows. The mutation c.1367A > G causes the replacement of individual amino acids (p. D456G) indicated by the red arrow. MLS: Mitochondrial Localization Signal; TM: Transmembrane domain; FAD: Flavin Adenine Dinucleotide; NADH: Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide. (B) AIFM1 protein alignment of eight species of vertebrates showing that the Aspartic (Asp, D) located in 456 highlighted in red box is evolutionarily highly conserved. (C) 3D molecular models of the WT and p. D456G AIFM1 proteins.
Functional analysis of the AIFM1 variant
After the transfection of WT and mutant AIFM1 plasmids into HEK293 cells, the subcellular localization of AIFM1 was detected by GFP fluorescence based on the fusion between the GFPSpark-tag and the C-terminal of AIFM1 protein. The results showed that green fluorescence was present in the entire cell transfected with vector plasmids and in the cytoplasm of the cells transfected with mutant and WT plasmids, indicating that both the WT and mutant AIFM1 proteins were localized in the cytoplasm (Figure 4A). Furthermore, immunofluorescence and quantitative results showed that the fluorescence intensity of the p. D456G AIFM1 was significantly lower than that of the WT AIFM1 (Figures 4A,B). Western Blot analysis was conducted to further investigate the effects of AIFM1 variant on the protein expression. The results showed that the AIFM1 protein expression was not detected in the vector group transfected with vector plasmids, while the WT AIFM1 protein was detected with the expected molecular weight, suggesting that the staining reaction observed in the immunocytochemical analysis was specifically derived from the GFPSpark-tagged AIFM1 proteins. The molecular weight of p. D456G AIFM1 protein was the same as that of the WT AIFM1 protein but with weaker band than that of the WT AIFM1 protein (Figure 4C). The quantitative results showed that the expression level of p. D456G AIFM1 protein was significantly decreased compared with the WT AIFM1 protein (Figure 4D). In order to investigate the effect of p. D456G on cell survival, we performed the Tunel staining assay (Figure 5). The results showed that compared with the vector group, HEK293 cells transfected with WT AIFM1 plasmid and c.1367A > G AIFM1 plasmid showed enhanced apoptosis, showing no significant difference between these two treatments.
FIGURE 4. Subcellular localization and protein expression of wild type (WT) and p. D456G AIFM1 proteins in HEK293 cells. (A) Subcellular localization of WT and p. D456G AIFM1 proteins in HEK293 cells shown in DAPI, GFP-tagged, and merged images. GFP fluorescence is detected after the transient transfection in HEK293 cells. Scale bar = 40 μm. (B) Quantitative analysis of fluorescence intensity based on images shown in (A). The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three biological replicates. The significant difference is set at p < 0.01 (**) based on the two-tailed unpaired t-test. (C) Expressions of WT and p. D456G AIFM1 in transfected HEK293 cells based on Western blot using anti-GFP and anti-β-actin (i.e., internal control) antibodies. (D) Quantitative analysis of proteins shown in (C). The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three biological replicates. The significant difference is set at p < 0.0001 (****) based on the one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests.
FIGURE 5. Tunel assay of wild type (WT) and p. D456G AIFM1 proteins in HEK293 cells shown in Tunel, DAPI, GFP-tagged, and merged images. PC: positive control. The white arrows indicate the apoptotic cells.
Discussion
As a specific type of hearing loss, AN is characterized by impaired language comprehension. In most cases, AIFM1 gene is responsible for the cases of late-onset AN (Li et al., 2021), which contributes to the maintenance of normal mitochondrial morphology and physiology as well as caspase-independent apoptosis (Rance and Starr, 2015). In the present study, the possible genetic cause and molecular mechanisms underlying the development of AN were explored in a Chinese family with AN.
The onset ages of patients with late-onset AN are mostly in the range of 5–20 years old with diverse clinical manifestations (Wang et al., 2020). Studies have shown that about 92.5% (360/389) of AN patients are presented with bilateral hearing loss (Bing et al., 2019) with audiogram mainly of low-frequency ascending type and diverse pure tone hearing manifestations which are identified as normal or mild to severe hearing loss (Wang et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2006; Zong et al., 2015; Wang and Starr, 2018), accompanied by significant decline in speech recognition ability (Starr et al., 1996). The results of our study were consistent with the above characteristics reported in the literature, showing that the proband of the family in this study was presented with typical symptoms of late-onset AN, i.e., the onset age of the proband was 15 years old, the audiogram showed low-frequency ascending type (Figure 1C), the PTA showed low-frequency mild hearing loss in both left and right ears with a disproportionate decrease in SDS (Figure 1C), the ABR waveform was illegible (Figure 1B), and the DPOAE was normal (Figure 1E). It was worth noting that although low-frequency ascending type was the most common type of hearing pattern of AN patients, including the patients involved in this study, there are still great differences in hearing patterns among AN patients. For example, a follow-up study found that some AN patients initially showed a low-frequency ascending hearing pattern, but with the progress of the disease, their high-frequency hearing was decreased rapidly to show a descending hearing pattern (Wang et al., 2020). Furthermore, some AN patients present with a descending hearing pattern involving the full frequency were accompanied by severe motor development impairment and mental retardation (Wang et al., 2019). Furthermore, consistent with previous studies (Wang and Starr, 2018), the threshold of ASSR results in our study was also significantly higher than that of PTA (Figure 1D). Moreover, another important clinical manifestation revealed in our study was that the proband complained that his speech recognition ability was worsened in the noisy environment, which was in accordance with the results of a controlled study of AN patients (Lan et al., 2019), suggesting that the speech recognition ability of AN patients with sound speech recognition rate in quiet environment was significantly decreased in the noisy environment. Meanwhile, the proband also showed tinnitus and aggravation under noise environment, which was consistent with the previous study (Xie et al., 2019).
Since the genetic factors account for 42% of the etiology of AN (Moser and Starr, 2016), the genomic DNA of the proband was extracted for NGS analysis. Combined with Sanger sequencing technology, the results showed that the c.1367A > G variant of AIFM1 carried by the proband came from the mother, and this variant was co-segregated with the phenotype of the family and was not identified in a total of 200 healthy controls. Base on the literature and publicly available databases, the variant c. 1367A > G has not been reported, indicating that this variant of AIFM1 gene identified in this study was a novel one, expanding the pool of the mutations of AIFM1 gene. Meanwhile, this variant was predicted as deleterious by REVEL, SIFT, Polyphen-2, and Mutation Taster (Table 1), suggesting the potentially pathogenic property of this variant. To date, a total of 19 pathogenic variants of AIFM1 related to AN have been reported in literature (Elrharchi et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020) and databases (Figure 6). The missense mutation (c.1367A > G) revealed in our study provided additional powerful support for molecular diagnosis of AN in clinical settings. These results evidently showed that a novel pathogenic AIFM1 variant, i.e., a missense mutation (c.1367A > G) in our study was first identified.
FIGURE 6. AIFM1 mutations associated with auditory neuropathy. The novel variant identified in this study is highlighted in red. The structural domains in AIFM1 shown include mitochondrial localization signal (MLS), transmembrane domain (TM), flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH), and C-terminal domain (C-terminal).
The variant of c.1367A > G was located in exon 13 of AIFM1 gene, causing the amino acid change of p. D456G in the second FAD domain of AIFM1 protein. Asp is an acidic polar aliphatic amino acid (Agius et al., 2018), which could be used as one of excitation-related neurotransmitter receptors in mammals (Kondoh et al., 2010), while Gly is a kind of non-polar aliphatic amino acid and an inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system (Roepke et al., 2008). As reported in the previous study (Xu et al., 2017), substitutions of amino acids of different polarities could largely affect the protein structures and functions of target protein. The change from polar Asp to non-polar Gly in this study could largely affect the structure, stability, and activity of the target protein. The 3D protein structure models (Figure 3C) further supported these findings, showing that the secondary and tertiary structures of the protein were largely changed. Studies showed that a total of 19 pathogenic variants previously identified mainly located in the NADH and second FAD domains of AIFM1 (Elrharchi et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020), indicating that the NADH and FAD domains play an essential role for the normal function of AIFM1 protein. The novel variant identified in this study was also located in the second FAD domain (Figure 6), which is required for FAD-dependent NADH oxidoreductase (Zong et al., 2015), suggesting that the novel variant could probably change the redox activity of AIFM1 to cause abnormal functions of the target protein.
Previous studies showed that changes in key amino acids could affect the conformation of the skeleton and thus disturb the local structure of the protein, even interfere with the inter- and intra-molecular interactions of proteins (Sapra et al., 2008), while AIFM1 usually interacts with a variety of proteins such as coiled-coil-helix-coiled-coil-helix domain containing 4 (CHCHD4) and Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1). Previous coevolutionary analysis and structural modeling (Hangen et al., 2015; Salscheider et al., 2022) indicated that the N-terminal region of CHCHD4 may form a β-hairpin to bind the C-terminal motif of AIFM1. Furthermore, studies showed that AIFM1 knockdown affected the interaction between CHCHD4 and its substrate and then the biogenesis of electron transport chain, suggesting the essential nature of the interaction between AIFM1 and CDCDH4 in this process (Salscheider et al., 2022). As shown in Figure 3C, the c.1367A > G variant altered the secondary structure of the C-terminus of AIFM1, which may affect its binding to the N-terminus of CDCDH4. PARP1 is a nuclear protein involved in DNA damage, while PAR polymers synthesized by PARP1 bind to AIFM1 on the mitochondrial membrane with damaged DNA, then AIFM1 is released to cytoplasm and translocated to the nucleus, resulting in large-scale DNA fragmentation (Wang et al., 2011; Mashimo et al., 2021). Therefore, changes in AIFM1 protein structure could affect its binding to PAR polymer and thus its ability to induce apoptosis. Furthermore, Asp at position 456 was evolutionarily highly conserved in eight vertebrate species, indicating that amino acid changes may affect protein structure and ultimately protein function. These results indicated that the c.1367A > G variant appeared to be critical for the structures and functions of AIFM1.
As an apoptosis-inducing factor, the AIFM1 is a flavin protein localized in the inner membrane space of mitochondria and is transported from mitochondria to the nucleus to induce cell apoptosis upon the occurrence of the apoptotic injury (Joza et al., 2009). The immunofluorescence analysis showed that the subcellular localization of p. D456G AIFM1 was consistent with that of the wild-type AIFM1, probably due to the MLS (Yuste et al., 2011) and nuclear localization signal (NLS) (Wang et al., 2016) of its N terminus. In a study of AIFM1 mutation causing Cowchock Syndrome, the mutant AIFM1 showed more AIFM1-positive inclusions detected by immunofluorescence, indicating a higher propensity to translocate to the nucleus (Rinaldi et al., 2012). However, our study showed that there was no significant difference between the mutant group and the wild type group, and the subsequent TUNEL assay showed that p. D456G AIFM1 and WT AIFM1 revealed the same TUNEL-positive apoptotic bodies. This difference was probably due to the fact that AIFM1 could cause a variety of diseases, such as childhood cerebellar ataxia (Heimer et al., 2018), mitochondrial encephalomyopathy (Ghezzi et al., 2010), motor neuropathy (Diodato et al., 2016; Hu et al., 2017; Sancho et al., 2017), Cowchock syndrome (Rinaldi et al., 2012) and auditory neuropathy (Zong et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2020), with different severity and potential pathogenesis.
Furthermore, the immunofluorescence analysis also showed that the fluorescence intensity of p. D456G AIFM1 was weaker than that of WT AIFM1, indicating that the variant of p. D456G changed the expression level of AIFM1. To further investigate the effect of p. D456G mutation on AIFM1 protein expression, western blot analysis was performed. The results were consistent with those of the immunofluorescence analysis, showing that the protein expression of p. D456G AIFM1 was significantly lower than that of wild-type AIFM1. As predicted by our 3D protein model, the p. D456G mutation affected the secondary/tertiary structure of the protein, resulting in degradation or low expression of the protein, which was further supported by the results of western blot. Previously, many scholars have studied the effect of AIFM1 mutation on protein expression with varied results. For example, patients with p. G338E (Diodato et al., 2016) and p. F210S (Sancho et al., 2017) variants all showed motor nerve lesions, and the expression level of AIFM1 was decreased. These results were consistent with the findings revealed in our study. Interestingly, in a study on axonal polyneuropathy caused by AIFM1 p. F210L variant (Hu et al., 2017), no significant change was detected in the AIFM1 protein expression, independent of the changes of different amino acids at the same site. Furthermore, in a study of mitochondrial encephalomyopathy caused by R201 del variant in AIFM1, the protein expression was not significantly altered (Ghezzi et al., 2010).
Under normal circumstances, AIFM1 is first transcribed and translated into a 67-kD precursor molecule (Liu et al., 2018), which is then transported to mitochondria through the N-terminal domain MLS sequence. The mitochondrial processing peptidase (MPP) cleaves AIFM1 in mitochondria into 62-kD mature AIFM1, which acts as the FAD-dependent NADH oxidoreductase to contribute to the stabilization and maturation of mitochondrial oxidation of respiratory chain complex I as well as the removal of peroxide from the mitochondria (Susin et al., 1999). When cells are damaged by apoptosis, mature AIFM1 is cleaved into soluble apoptotic precursor protein, i.e., the truncated AIF (tAIF) of about 57 kD (Susin et al., 1999; Joza et al., 2001). The tAIF is released from mitochondria into cytosol and nucleus to induce two typical caspase-independent apoptosis phenomena: chromatin condensation and fragmentation of large DNA fragments of approximately 50 kD (Yuste et al., 2011).
A study of AIFM1 p. P488L variants in auditory neuropathy and peripheral neuropathy showed that AIFM1 p. P488L variants caused a mild increase in the rate of caspase-independent apoptosis in cells (Wang et al., 2019). Because the immunofluorescence and WB assays showed that the p. D456G variant reduced AIFM1 protein expression, the Tunel assay was performed to evaluate its adverse effect on cell survival. The results showed that the ability of AIFM1 to induce apoptosis was not significantly affected by the p. D456G mutation, showing the same effect on cell survival as that of WT AIFM, indicating that the p. D456G variant did not affect cell survival. This may also be the reason for the generation of mild symptoms of AN patients. Previous studies showed that the AIFM1 R201del variant caused severe mitochondrial encephalomyopathy and significantly increased parthanatos-linked cell death (Ghezzi et al., 2010). In the study of Cowchock Syndrome caused by AIFM1 p. E493V variant, Tunel assay of muscle biopsy showed a large number of apoptotic cells in the samples of the mutated individuals, while little or no staining was detected in the muscles of healthy controls (Rinaldi et al., 2012). However, in patients with distal motor neuropathy carrying the p. F210S mutation, the mutation did not enhance the apoptosis (Sancho et al., 2017), which was consistent with our study. Similarly, as mentioned above, the p. F210S mutation also reduced the protein expression level with mitochondrial fragmentation also observed in fibroblasts of this patient, suggesting that the development of distal motor neuropathy in this patient may be related to the defective mitochondrial respiration (Sancho et al., 2017). Therefore, we hypothesized that this mutation might affect the role of AIFM1 in oxidative phosphorylation, redox control, and respiratory chain activity. Study showed that knockdown of AIFM1 could attenuate mitochondrial respiration and ATP production, ultimately affecting cell functions (Zong et al., 2020). Furthermore, some studies showed that in the auditory pathway, including inner hair cells, glial cells in neural pathways, and spiral ganglion cell (SGC), the normal energy metabolism was the key to maintain its physiological activity (Yang et al., 2015). Therefore, as suggested in the previous studies (Zong et al., 2015), the variant revealed in our study may cause AN by affecting the function of AIFM1 protein in mitochondria, ultimately affecting the mitochondrial respiration and ATP synthesis in inner ear. Moreover, as mentioned above, the 3D prediction results showed that the p. D456G mutation affected both the secondary and tertiary structures of the C-terminal, while the binding of the N-terminal of CHCHD4 and the C-terminal of AIFM1 played an important role in the biogenesis of mitochondrial respiratory chain complex Ⅰ. The decreased expression level of AIFM1 could affect this interaction, and then affect the function of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. These functional experiments further demonstrated that the novel mutation identified in this study could cause damage to AIFM1 protein, which could be the underlying genetic etiology of this family with AN, and further experiments of mitochondrial respiratory chain activity and oxidative phosphorylation are necessary to explore the pathological mechanism of this mutation.
In summary, we identified a novel c.1367A > G AIFM1 variant in a Chinese family with AN by targeted capture sequencing, expanding the AN-related mutation spectrum of AIFM1. Bioinformatics prediction and functional analysis showed that AIFM1 c.1367A > G was a pathogenic mutation and may be the genetic cause of AN in this Chinese family, providing additional molecular and clinical evidence to support the establishment of a strong genotype-phenotype correlation for AN.
Data availability statement
The data presented in the study are deposited in the the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) repository, accession number PRJNA891130.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of Shandong Provincial Hospital. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin.
Author contributions
ZL and SY designed the research; RW analyzed the data and wrote the paper; XB, HY, and JM performed the research; RW, XB, and HY performed the clinical work.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant numbers 81670942, 81972057 and 81000407; the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, grant numbers ZR2017MH004 and ZR2019PH059; Special Funds for Taishan Scholar Project, grant numbers tsqn202103180.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all the participants in this study for their contributions to this research.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Agius, C., Von Tucher, S., Poppenberger, B., and Rozhon, W. (2018). Quantification of glutamate and aspartate by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography. Molecules 23 (6), E1389. doi:10.3390/molecules23061389
Bai, X., Lv, H., Zhang, F., Liu, J., Fan, Z., Xu, L., et al. (2014). Identification of a novel missense mutation in the WFS1 gene as a cause of autosomal dominant nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss in all-frequencies. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 164A (12), 3052–3060. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.36760
Bing, D., Wang, H., Xie, L., Guan, J., Lan, L., Han, B., et al. (2019). Correlation between pure tone hearing threshold and time duration in patients with auditory neuropathy. Chin. J. Otology 17 (1), 23–27. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2019.01.004
Boudewyns, A., Declau, F., van den Ende, J., Hofkens, A., Dirckx, S., and Van de Heyning, P. (2016). Auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) in referrals from neonatal hearing screening at a well-baby clinic. Eur. J. Pediatr. 175 (7), 993–1000. doi:10.1007/s00431-016-2735-5
Chinese Multi-center Research CollaborativeEditorial Board of Chinese Journal ofOtorhinolaryngology Head and Neck SurgerySociety of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chinese Medical Association, China DivisionInternational Association of Physicians in Audiology, Society of Audiology and Vestibular MedicineChina Interna, and tional Exchange and Promotive Association for Medical and Health Care (2022). Chinese clinical practice guideline of auditory neuropathy (version 2022). Chin. J. Otorhinolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg. 57 (3), 241–262. Group on Clinical Diagnosis and Intervention of Auditory NeuropathyE.B.o.C.J.o.O.H.a.N.S., Society of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chinese Medical Association, China Division, International Association of Physicians in Audiology, Society of Audiology and Vestibular Medicine, China International Exchange and Promotive Association for Medical and Health Care. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20220117-00031
Diodato, D., Tasca, G., Verrigni, D., D'Amico, A., Rizza, T., Tozzi, G., et al. (2016). A novel AIFM1 mutation expands the phenotype to an infantile motor neuron disease. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 24 (3), 463–466. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.141
El-Badry, M. M., and McFadden, S. L. (2009). Evaluation of inner hair cell and nerve fiber loss as sufficient pathologies underlying auditory neuropathy. Hear. Res. 255 (1-2), 84–90. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2009.06.003
Elrharchi, S., Riahi, Z., Salime, S., Charoute, H., Elkhattabi, L., Boulouiz, R., et al. (2020). Novel mutation in AIFM1 gene associated with X-linked deafness in a Moroccan family. Hum. Hered. 85 (1), 35–39. doi:10.1159/000512712
Ghezzi, D., Sevrioukova, I., Invernizzi, F., Lamperti, C., Mora, M., D'Adamo, P., et al. (2010). Severe X-linked mitochondrial encephalomyopathy associated with a mutation in apoptosis-inducing factor. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 86 (4), 639–649. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.03.002
Hangen, E., Feraud, O., Lachkar, S., Mou, H., Doti, N., Fimia, G. M., et al. (2015). Interaction between AIF and CHCHD4 regulates respiratory chain biogenesis. Mol. Cell 58 (6), 1001–1014. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.020
Heimer, G., Eyal, E., Zhu, X., Ruzzo, E. K., Marek-Yagel, D., Sagiv, D., et al. (2018). Mutations in AIFM1 cause an X-linked childhood cerebellar ataxia partially responsive to riboflavin. Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol. 22 (1), 93–101. doi:10.1016/j.ejpn.2017.09.004
Hu, B., Wang, M., Castoro, R., Simmons, M., Dortch, R., Yawn, R., et al. (2017). A novel missense mutation in AIFM1 results in axonal polyneuropathy and misassembly of OXPHOS complexes. Eur. J. Neurol. 24 (12), 1499–1506. doi:10.1111/ene.13452
Ioannidis, N. M., Rothstein, J. H., Pejaver, V., Middha, S., McDonnell, S. K., Baheti, S., et al. (2016). Revel: An ensemble method for predicting the pathogenicity of rare missense variants. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 99 (4), 877–885. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.08.016
Itai, B., Ziva, B. N., Talia, D. W., Avraham, S., Ann, S., Shamir, Z., et al. (2011). Early prenatal ventriculomegaly due to an AIFM1 mutation identified by linkage analysis and whole exome sequencing. Mol. Genet. Metab. 104 (4), 517–520. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.09.020
Joza, N., Pospisilik, J. A., Hangen, E., Hanada, T., Modjtahedi, N., Penninger, J. M., et al. (2009). Aif: Not just an apoptosis-inducing factor. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1171, 2–11. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04681.x
Joza, N., Susin, S. A., Daugas, E., Stanford, W. L., Cho, S. K., Li, C. Y., et al. (2001). Essential role of the mitochondrial apoptosis-inducing factor in programmed cell death. Nature 410 (6828), 549–554. doi:10.1038/35069004
Kondoh, T., Kameishi, M., Mallick, H. N., Ono, T., and Torii, K. (2010). Lysine and arginine reduce the effects of cerebral ischemic insults and inhibit glutamate-induced neuronal activity in rats. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 4, 18. doi:10.3389/fnint.2010.00018
Lan, L., Li, Q., Xie, L., Xiong, F., Han, B., and Wang, Q. (2019). Clinical application of speech recognition in noise test in patients with auditory neuropathy. Chin. J. Otology 17 (1), 9–16. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2019.01.002
Li, J., Wu, K., Guan, J., Wang, Q., and Wang, H. (2021). Generation of a human induced pluripotent stem cell line (CPGHi001-A) from a hearing loss patient with the TMC1 p.M418K mutation. Stem Cell Res. 53, 101982. doi:10.1016/j.scr.2020.101982
Liu, D., Liu, M., Wang, W., Pang, L., Wang, Z., Yuan, C., et al. (2018). Overexpression of apoptosis-inducing factor mitochondrion-associated 1 (AIFM1) induces apoptosis by promoting the transcription of caspase3 and DRAM in hepatoma cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 498 (3), 453–457. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.02.203
Mashimo, M., Onishi, M., Uno, A., Tanimichi, A., Nobeyama, A., Mori, M., et al. (2021). The 89-kDa PARP1 cleavage fragment serves as a cytoplasmic PAR carrier to induce AIF-mediated apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 296, 100046. doi:10.1074/jbc.RA120.014479
Moser, T., and Starr, A. (2016). Auditory neuropathy--neural and synaptic mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 12 (3), 135–149. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2016.10
Rance, G., and Starr, A. (2015). Pathophysiological mechanisms and functional hearing consequences of auditory neuropathy. Brain 138 (11), 3141–3158. doi:10.1093/brain/awv270
Rinaldi, C., Grunseich, C., Sevrioukova, I. F., Schindler, A., Horkayne-Szakaly, I., Lamperti, C., et al. (2012). Cowchock syndrome is associated with a mutation in apoptosis-inducing factor. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 91 (6), 1095–1102. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.10.008
Roepke, T. A., Xue, C., Bosch, M. A., Scanlan, T. S., Kelly, M. J., and Ronnekleiv, O. K. (2008). Genes associated with membrane-initiated signaling of estrogen and energy homeostasis. Endocrinology 149 (12), 6113–6124. doi:10.1210/en.2008-0769
Salscheider, S. L., Gerlich, S., Cabrera-Orefice, A., Peker, E., Rothemann, R. A., Murschall, L. M., et al. (2022). AIFM1 is a component of the mitochondrial disulfide relay that drives complex I assembly through efficient import of NDUFS5. EMBO J. 41 (17), e110784. doi:10.15252/embj.2022110784
Sancho, P., Sanchez-Monteagudo, A., Collado, A., Marco-Marin, C., Dominguez-Gonzalez, C., Camacho, A., et al. (2017). A newly distal hereditary motor neuropathy caused by a rare AIFM1 mutation. Neurogenetics 18 (4), 245–250. doi:10.1007/s10048-017-0524-6
Sapra, K. T., Doehner, J., Renugopalakrishnan, V., Padros, E., and Muller, D. J. (2008). Role of extracellular glutamic acids in the stability and energy landscape of bacteriorhodopsin. Biophys. J. 95 (7), 3407–3418. doi:10.1529/biophysj.108.131904
Starr, A., Picton, T. W., Sininger, Y., Hood, L. J., and Berlin, C. I. (1996). Auditory neuropathy. Brain 119 (3), 741–753. doi:10.1093/brain/119.3.741
Susin, S. A., Lorenzo, H. K., Zamzami, N., Marzo, I., Snow, B. E., Brothers, G. M., et al. (1999). Molecular characterization of mitochondrial apoptosis-inducing factor. Nature 397 (6718), 441–446. doi:10.1038/17135
Talaat, H. S., Kabel, A. H., Samy, H., and Elbadry, M. (2009). Prevalence of auditory neuropathy (AN) among infants and young children with severe to profound hearing loss. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 73 (7), 937–939. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.03.009
Wang, H., Bing, D., Li, J., Xie, L., Xiong, F., Lan, L., et al. (2020). High frequency of AIFM1 variants and phenotype progression of auditory neuropathy in a Chinese population. Neural Plast. 2020, 5625768. doi:10.1155/2020/5625768
Wang, Q., Gu, R., Han, D., and Yang, W. (2003). Familial auditory neuropathy. Laryngoscope 113 (9), 1623–1629. doi:10.1097/00005537-200309000-00041
Wang, Q. J., Li, Q. Z., Rao, S. Q., Lee, K., Huang, X. S., Yang, W. Y., et al. (2006). AUNX1, a novel locus responsible for X linked recessive auditory and peripheral neuropathy, maps to Xq23-27.3. J. Med. Genet. 43 (7), e33. doi:10.1136/jmg.2005.037929
Wang, Q., and Starr, A. (2018). Hereditary auditory neuropathies: Stepping into precision management from the discovery. Chin. J. Otorhinolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg. 53 (3), 161–171. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2018.03.001
Wang, Q., Xingxing, L., Ding, Z., Qi, Y., and Liu, Y. (2019). Whole exome sequencing identifies a novel variant in an apoptosis-inducing factor gene associated with X-linked recessive hearing loss in a Chinese family. Genet. Mol. Biol. 42 (3), 543–548. doi:10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2018-0051
Wang, Y., An, R., Umanah, G. K., Park, H., Nambiar, K., Eacker, S. M., et al. (2016). A nuclease that mediates cell death induced by DNA damage and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1. Science 354 (6308), aad6872. doi:10.1126/science.aad6872
Wang, Y., Kim, N. S., Haince, J. F., Kang, H. C., David, K. K., Andrabi, S. A., et al. (2011). Poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) binding to apoptosis-inducing factor is critical for PAR polymerase-1-dependent cell death (parthanatos). Sci. Signal. 4 (167), ra20. doi:10.1126/scisignal.2000902
Xiao, Y., Luo, J., Zhang, F., Li, J., Han, Y., Zhang, D., et al. (2016). A novel mutation in PAX3 associated with Waardenburg syndrome type I in a Chinese family. Acta Otolaryngol. 136 (5), 439–445. doi:10.3109/00016489.2015.1132846
Xie, L., Guan, J., Xiong, F., Lan, L., Wang, D., and Wang, Q. (2019). A follow-up study in patients with auditory neuropathy and tinnitus. Chin. J. Otology 17 (1), 28–34. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2019.01.005
Xu, S., Cheng, J., Cai, M. Y., Liang, L. L., Cen, J. M., Yang, X. L., et al. (2017). The impact of tagSNPs in CXCL16 gene on the risk of myocardial infarction in a Chinese han population. Dis. Markers 2017, 9463272. doi:10.1155/2017/9463272
Yang, J., Guan, J., Zong, L., Wang, H., Zhang, C., Zhang, Y., et al. (2015). Energy metabolism study of AIF gene. Chin. J. Otology 13 (2), 250–254. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2015.02.013
Yuste, V. J., Lorenzo, H. K., and Susin, S. A. (2011). AIFM1 (apoptosis-inducing factor, mitochondrion-associated, 1). Atlas Genet. cytogenet. Oncol. Haematol. (3). doi:10.4267/2042/38516
Zong, L., Guan, J., Ealy, M., Zhang, Q., Wang, D., Wang, H., et al. (2015). Mutations in apoptosis-inducing factor cause X-linked recessive auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder. J. Med. Genet. 52 (8), 523–531. doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102961
Keywords: auditory neuropathy, hearing loss, mutation, apoptosis inducing factor mitochondrion associated 1 (AIFM1), next-generation sequencing (NGS)
Citation: Wang R, Bai X, Yang H, Ma J, Yu S and Lu Z (2022) Identification of a novel AIFM1 variant from a Chinese family with auditory neuropathy. Front. Genet. 13:1064823. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1064823
Received: 08 October 2022; Accepted: 07 November 2022;
Published: 21 November 2022.
Edited by:
Fuping Qian, Nantong University, ChinaReviewed by:
Xiuhong Pang, Jiangsu Taizhou People’s Hospital, ChinaCheng Cheng, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, China
Copyright © 2022 Wang, Bai, Yang, Ma, Yu and Lu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zhiming Lu, bHV6aGltaW5nQHNkdS5lZHUuY24=; Shudong Yu, eXVzaHVkb25nQDEyNi5jb20=
†Deceased