AUTHOR=Torkamani Ali , Pham Phillip , Libiger Ondrej , Bansal Vikas , Zhang Guangfa , Scott-Van Zeeland Ashley A., Tewhey Ryan , Topol Eric J., Schork Nicholas TITLE=Clinical Implications of Human Population Differences in Genome-Wide Rates of Functional Genotypes JOURNAL=Frontiers in Genetics VOLUME=3 YEAR=2012 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genetics/articles/10.3389/fgene.2012.00211 DOI=10.3389/fgene.2012.00211 ISSN=1664-8021 ABSTRACT=

There have been a number of recent successes in the use of whole genome sequencing and sophisticated bioinformatics techniques to identify pathogenic DNA sequence variants responsible for individual idiopathic congenital conditions. However, the success of this identification process is heavily influenced by the ancestry or genetic background of a patient with an idiopathic condition. This is so because potential pathogenic variants in a patient’s genome must be contrasted with variants in a reference set of genomes made up of other individuals’ genomes of the same ancestry as the patient. We explored the effect of ignoring the ancestries of both an individual patient and the individuals used to construct reference genomes. We pursued this exploration in two major steps. We first considered variation in the per-genome number and rates of likely functional derived (i.e., non-ancestral, based on the chimp genome) single nucleotide variants and small indels in 52 individual whole human genomes sampled from 10 different global populations. We took advantage of a suite of computational and bioinformatics techniques to predict the functional effect of over 24 million genomic variants, both coding and non-coding, across these genomes. We found that the typical human genome harbors ∼5.5–6.1 million total derived variants, of which ∼12,000 are likely to have a functional effect (∼5000 coding and ∼7000 non-coding). We also found that the rates of functional genotypes per the total number of genotypes in individual whole genomes differ dramatically between human populations. We then created tables showing how the use of comparator or reference genome panels comprised of genomes from individuals that do not have the same ancestral background as a patient can negatively impact pathogenic variant identification. Our results have important implications for clinical sequencing initiatives.