Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Gastroenterol., 12 May 2023
Sec. Hepatology

Investigating the effects of long-term Aroclor 1260 exposure on fatty liver disease in a diet-induced obesity mouse model

Kimberly Z. Head,Kimberly Z. Head1,2Oluwanifemi E. BolatimiOluwanifemi E. Bolatimi3Tyler C. GripshoverTyler C. Gripshover3Min TanMin Tan4Yan LiYan Li4Timothy N. AudamTimothy N. Audam5Steven P. JonesSteven P. Jones5Carolyn M. Klinge,Carolyn M. Klinge6,7Matthew C. Cave,,,,,,*Matthew C. Cave1,2,3,6,7,8,9*Banrida Wahlang,,,*Banrida Wahlang1,2,7,8*
  • 1Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States
  • 2The Hepatobiology and Toxicology Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States
  • 3Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States
  • 4Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States
  • 5Center for Cardiometabolic Science, Department of Medicine, Division of Environmental Medicine, Christina Lee Brown Envirome Institute, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States
  • 6Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States
  • 7The Center for Integrative Environmental Health Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States
  • 8University of Louisville (UofL) Superfund Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States
  • 9Robley Rex Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Louisville, KY, United States

Introduction: Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are persistent environmental toxicants that have been implicated in numerous health disorders including liver diseases such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Toxicant-associated NAFLD, also known as toxicant-associated fatty liver disease (TAFLD), consists of a spectrum of disorders ranging from steatosis and steatohepatitis to fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Previously, our group demonstrated that 12-week exposure to the PCB mixture, Aroclor 1260, exacerbated steatohepatitis in high-fat diet (HFD)-fed mice; however, the longer-term effects of PCBs on TAFLD remain to be elucidated. This study aims to examine the longer-term effects of Aroclor 1260 (>30 weeks) in a diet-induced obesity model to better understand how duration of exposure can impact TAFLD.

Methods: Male C57BL/6 mice were exposed to Aroclor 1260 (20 mg/kg) or vehicle control by oral gavage at the beginning of the study period and fed either a low-fat diet (LFD) or HFD throughout the study period.

Results: Aroclor 1260 exposure (>30 weeks) led to steatohepatitis only in LFD-fed mice. Several Aroclor 1260 exposed LFD-fed mice also developed hepatocellular carcinoma (25%), which was absent in HFD-fed mice. The LFD+Aroclor1260 group also exhibited decreased hepatic Cyp7a1 expression and increased pro-fibrotic Acta2 expression. In contrast, longer term Aroclor 1260 exposure in conjunction with HFD did not exacerbate steatosis or inflammatory responses beyond those observed with HFD alone. Further, hepatic xenobiotic receptor activation by Aroclor 1260 was absent at 31 weeks post exposure, suggesting PCB redistribution to the adipose and other extra-hepatic tissues with time.

Discussion: Overall, the results demonstrated that longer-term PCB exposure worsened TAFLD outcomes independent of HFD feeding and suggests altered energy metabolism as a potential mechanism fueling PCB mediated toxicity without dietary insult. Additional research exploring mechanisms for these longer-term PCB mediated toxicity in TAFLD is warranted.

Highlights

● Aroclor 1260 (31 week-exposure) caused steatohepatitis and liver tumors in mice fed a low-fat diet.

● Aroclor 1260 (31 week-exposure) did not exacerbate NAFLD nor cause liver tumors in high fat diet-fed mice.

● Hepatic xenobiotic receptor activation by Aroclor 1260 was absent at 31 weeks post exposure.

Introduction

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are environmental toxicants associated with numerous health effects such as cardiovascular complications and metabolic diseases in exposed populations (13). Categorized as persistent organic pollutants (POPs), PCBs continue to threaten public health due to their resistance to degradation and bioaccumulation in living organisms (4). PCBs were initially manufactured for commercial use primarily as dielectric fluids in electrical capacitors and transformers, in addition to other industrial applications and uses (5). Due to their carcinogenic properties, PCB production and use was halted by the US Congress in 1979, and worldwide at the historic Stockholm Convention on POPs in 2001. Despite being banned decades ago, PCBs continue to be detected in the air and water (6, 7). Moreover, appreciable levels of PCBs continue to be detected in the general American adult population as reported in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) (8). Human exposures to PCBs today occur primarily through ingestion of PCB-contaminated food and water, particularly ocean-based food sources (9, 10).

Depending on the number of chlorine atom substitutions in the biphenyl ring, there are up to 209 individual PCB congeners possible (4). Approximately 130 of these congeners were commercially produced and marketed as mixtures of PCBs. In North America, PCBs were predominantly produced by Monsanto Corporation at its industrial production plant situated in Anniston, Alabama. Monsanto manufactured and sold PCB mixtures under the brand name ‘Aroclor’ with Aroclor 1260 being one of Monsanto’s first generation Aroclors marketed during the 1920s (4, 5, 11). Aroclor 1260 contains 60% chlorine by weight, rendering it highly toxic, and was later replaced by lesser chlorinated Aroclors including Aroclor 1016. Nevertheless, due to its high chlorination, Aroclor 1260 is resistant to metabolism, leading to bioaccumulation in living organisms (4, 12). Structurally, based on the position of chlorine atoms in the biphenyl ring, PCB congeners can be classified as either coplanar or non-coplanar. Coplanar PCBs have either one or no chlorine atom substitution in the ortho position of the biphenyl ring and are generally lower molecular weight congeners (e.g., PCBs 77 and 126) (12). Coplanar PCBs tend to have a higher binding affinity to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), similar to dioxin and may also be termed ‘dioxin-like’ PCBs (13). In contrast, non-coplanar PCBs are congeners with more than one ortho-substituted chlorine atoms in the biphenyl ring, which tend to be higher molecular weight congeners that are more heavily chlorinated and resistant to metabolism (e.g., PCB 153) (12). Non-coplanar PCBs can bind and activate the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR), like phenobarbital, and are also known as ‘phenobarbital-like’ or ‘non-dioxin-like’ PCBs. Because of its high chlorine content and constitution of primarily higher molecular weight congeners that are not readily metabolized, Aroclor 1260 is often considered a non-dioxin-like PCB mixture (11). Importantly, the PCB congener composition in Aroclor 1260 strongly resembles PCB bioaccumulation patterns in humans thus reflecting relevance to current PCB exposures (12, 14).

PCB contribution to the development of metabolic diseases, including non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been well-documented (15). NAFLD is a spectrum of pathologic disorders in the liver initially characterized by steatosis or fat accumulation in the hepatocytes. Steatosis can be accompanied by inflammation leading to steatohepatitis which can further progress to fibrosis and/or cirrhosis. The observed NAFLD and its more severe form non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), when associated with environmental chemical exposures, are often termed as toxicant-associated fatty liver disease (TAFLD) and toxicant associated steatohepatitis (TASH) respectively (16). Positive associations between PCB levels and liver injury markers including elevated liver enzymes and proinflammatory cytokines have been reported in human epidemiologic studies (15). Moreover, both dioxin-like PCBs and non-dioxin-like PCBs have been demonstrated to cause steatosis, hepatic inflammation and injury, and disruption of overall energy metabolism in different experimental laboratory models (15). Additionally, both PCBs and NAFLD (17) have both been associated with the development of cardiovascular diseases, implicating the importance of investigating PCB effects on cardio-metabolic outcomes as well. Previous studies from our group have shown that exposure to Aroclor 1260 at environmentally relevant doses for 12-weeks exacerbated steatohepatitis, worsened systemic inflammation, and caused metabolic disruption in a diet-induced obesity (DIO) mouse model, partially through hepatic receptor activation including CAR and AHR, and PCB-diet interactions (11). Further analyses of the hepatic proteome and phospho-proteome in this model revealed that the PCB-induced alterations in the liver also led to early-stage fibrosis and secondary necrosis. Identified mechanisms included hepatic stellate cell activation by PCBs mediated through tumor growth factor beta (TGFβ); and modified oxidative stress responses through PCB-regulated attenuation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) activation (18).

Collectively, these findings suggest that extending the duration of exposure to Aroclor 1260 from 12 weeks to a longer time period in the DIO model should result in established hepatic fibrosis. Furthermore, there are currently no studies that have evaluated the effects of longer-term exposures to PCBs in the context of TAFLD and TASH. Importantly, PCB exposures in humans occur throughout one’s lifespan and can elicit life-long effects, given the nature of bioaccumulation and long half-lives of these ‘forever’ chemicals. Therefore, investigations of PCBs impact on the liver and other PCB target organs with low-dose, longer-term exposures are warranted and are of significance when exploring human PCB exposure paradigms. Thus, the objective of the current study is to evaluate the effects of long-term (>30 weeks) exposures, namely Aroclor 1260, in conjunction with high-fat diet (HFD) feeding to better understand if i) longer-term PCB exposure alone is sufficient to induce TAFLD/TASH in the absence of high-fat diets, and if ii) longer-term PCB exposure and concurrent high-fat diet feeding will result in exacerbated fibrosis. In addition, iii) the current study also assessed longer-term PCB effects on cardiovascular endpoints as a secondary endpoint. The findings from this study will provide insight on the impact of long-term exposures to POPs including PCBs on liver and metabolic health.

Materials and methods

Animal studies

The current study was approved by the University of Louisville Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. 8-week-old male C57BL/6J (stock# 0664) mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). All animals were housed in a temperature and light controlled (12 h light; 12 h dark) room with food and water ad libitum. Mice were divided into 4 groups (n=15) and designated with the following abbreviations representing exposure groups as follows: low fat diet + corn oil (LFD-CO), low fat diet + Aroclor 1260 (LFD-AR), high fat diet + corn oil (HFD-CO), and high fat diet + Aroclor 1260 (HFD-AR). A timeline of the animal exposure study and related procedures are illustrated in Figure 1. Mice were allowed to acclimate for two weeks prior to introduction of diet. LFD groups received 10% kcal from fat through a synthetic diet, Teklad, TD.06416 (Envigo, Indianapolis, IN, USA) while high fat diet groups received 42% kcal from fat through a synthetic diet, Teklad TD.88137 (Envigo, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Description of the diets are provided in Supplemental Table 1. Mice were administered either Aroclor 1260 (20 mg/kg) (catalog: C-260N-1G, AccuStandard, New Haven, CT, USA) solubilized in corn oil or vehicle control (corn oil only). Food and body weights were collected biweekly throughout the 31-week study period. A glucose tolerance test was performed at week 8 and week 21 post exposure. Echocardiograms and liver echogenicity via ultrasound were assessed at week 23 post exposure. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) Lunar PIXImus Densitometer (GE Medical Systems, LUNAR, Madison, WI) was used to assess fat and lean tissue mass at 23 weeks post PCB exposure. Mice were euthanized and tissue and plasma samples collected at week 31 post exposure. Final tissue weights were recorded after collection and used to calculate organ to body weight ratios. All tissues were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and immediately transferred to -80°C for long term storage. Blood was collected from inferior vena cava and anticoagulated with EDTA. Plasma was prepared by centrifugation at 2000g for 10 minutes at 4°C.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Schematic diagram of the study timeline with respect to HFD feeding, Aroclor 1260 administration and additional experimental procedures.

Echocardiograms and liver echogenicity

Transthoracic echocardiography of the left ventricle was performed with the Vevo 3100 High Resolution (Fujifilm VisualSonics, Toronto, ON, Canada) in vivo Imaging System, as described for the heart (19, 20) and liver (21). Mice were initially anesthetized with 2% isoflurane with maintenance at 1.5% isoflurane during the examination procedure. Body temperature was maintained at 36.5 -37.5°C using a rectal thermometer interfaced with a controlled heat lamp. Depilatory cream was applied to the mouse’s chest and wiped clean to remove all hair around area of interest. The Vevo MX550D (40 MHz) scan head was used to obtain two-dimensional images of the parasternal long axis loops of the heart. M-modes were taken from the same images. The probe was then adjusted to view the liver, aorta, and mitral valve. Doppler readings of the aorta were obtained as well as still frames and loops of the liver. A standardized region of interest was applied to still images captured from liver ultrasound and correlative mean pixel count data obtained.

Glucose tolerance test and homeostasis model assessments

Glucose tolerance testing was performed at week 8 and week 21 post Aroclor 1260 oral gavage. Mice were fasted for 6 hours prior to baseline blood sugar assessment. Blood glucose was measured with a handheld glucometer (Contour Next EZ, Ascensia Diabetes Care US, Parsippany, NJ, USA). Mice were challenged with glucose (1 mg/gram body weight) via intraperitoneal administration. Glucose levels were measured at 15, 30-, 60-, 90- and 120-minutes post glucose challenge. Results were graphed as glucose concentration in mg/dL versus time with area under the curve (AUC) calculated using the Trapezoid Rule (22). Plasma insulin values were measured using a Rat/Mouse Insulin ELISA assay (EMD Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). Concentration for unknown samples was extrapolated from a 5-parameter logistic curve generated from absorbance at 450 nm less absorbance at 590 nm of rat insulin standards. Using fasting blood glucose values and insulin values, insulin resistance and beta cell function were assessed. Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) and Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta Cell Function (HOMA-β) were used as previously described (23). Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) was also determined using standard mathematical transformations of fasting blood glucose and plasma insulin concentrations (24).

Histology

Tissues were collected and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 72 hours before embedding in paraffin wax or in OCT for frozen sections. Oil Red O staining was used to stain 5-micron frozen sections prepared using a cryostat machine. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of 5-micron sections from formalin fixed, and paraffin embedded hepatic tissues were performed to detect alterations in morphology and structure. Tissues were heat set at 55°C for 30 minutes to prevent shredding or tissue loss and sequentially cleared through multiple changes of Citrisolv Hybrid (Decon Laboratories, Inc. King of Prussia, PA, USA), then dehydrated by sequential graded alcohol steps, staining with Modified Mayer’s Hematoxylin (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and counterstained with Alcoholic Eosin Y with phloxine (Millipore Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Hydrated slides were then cover slipped with permanent mounting media and imaged with an Olympus DP74 microscope and CellSens Standard v2.3 software. A second series of slides were stained with saturated picric acid containing 0.1% Sirius Red (Direct Red 80, Millipore Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) stain for 30 minutes to visualize collagen bundle staining (25).

NAFLD activity scoring

According to the previous report by the Pathology Subcommittee of the NASH Clinical Research Network, NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) was analyzed in each H&E-stained slide. NAS was calculated by the sum of scores for steatosis (0–3), lobular inflammation (0–3), and hepatocyte ballooning (0–2). Five fields of view per hepatic sample were scored separately for steatosis, inflammation, and ballooning of hepatocytes as follows: Steatosis: 0, <5%; 1, 5-33%; 2, >33%; 3, > 66%. Lobular Inflammation: 0, no foci; 1/200X, <2 foci/200X; 2, 2-4 foci/200X; 3,>4 foci/200X. Hepatocyte Ballooning: 0, no balloon cells/200X; 1, 1-5 balloon cells/200X; 2,>5 balloon cells/200X (26).

Plasma adipocytokine and lipid measurements

Plasma levels for alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and circulating levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL), triglycerides, and cholesterol were obtained using an Abaxis Piccolo Xpress analyzer (Abbott; Abbott Park, IL, USA) with Lipid Panel Plus diskettes (catalog:400-0030; Abaxis Inc.; Union City, CA, USA). Circulating levels of plasma adipokines and cytokines were measured using a MILLIPLEX® Mouse Adipokine Magnetic Bead Panel (Millipore Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA) for analytes interleukin 6 (IL-6), leptin, total plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), and resistin. Data was obtained from a Luminex 100/200 System equipped with xPONENT Software (Luminex Corporate, Austin, TX, USA). Hepatic lipids were extracted using a modified Bligh and Dyer method with a 2:1 ratio of chloroform to methanol mixture (27, 28). Extracted lipids were measured using Infinity Assay Reagents: Infinity Triglycerides reagent (TR22421, ThermoFisher Scientific, Middletown, VA, USA) and Infinity Cholesterol reagent (TR13421, ThermoFisher Scientific, Middletown, VA, USA). Sample absorbance at 500 nm was calculated from a standard curve constructed from clinical standards (catalog: T7531-STD, C7509-STD; Point Scientific; Canton, MI) for each analyte ran simultaneously with unknown samples.

RT-PCR

Tissues suspended in RNA Stat 60 (Tel-Test, Inc., Friendswood, TX, USA) were homogenized with 0.5 mm glass beads (Biospec Products, Bartletsville, OK, USA) using a Mini-Beadbeater 16 bead mill homogenizer (Biospec Products, Bartlesville, OK, USA) for 30 seconds to disrupt tissues. Ribonucleic acid (RNA) was extracted from cleared homogenate by chloroform addition and then precipitated by addition of isopropanol. Pelleted RNA was washed with 75% ethanol, evaporated to dryness, and then resolubilized in RNA free diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC) treated water. Quality and quantity of RNA was determined using OD 260/280 values obtained from Nanodrop-OneC Microvolume UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher). qScript cDNA SuperMix (QuantaBio, Beverly, MA, USA) facilitated first strand cDNA synthesis of 1 µg RNA for Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR). RT-PCR was performed using the Biorad CFX384 TM Real-Time System (Biorad, Hercules, CA USA) using iTaq Universal Probes Supermix (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA) and selected Taqman probes (Thermo Fisher) as described in Supplemental Table 2. The final RT-PCR volume was 10.5 µL (using iTaq Universal Probes Supermix=5 µL, Taqman probes=0.5 µL each, cDNA=1.5 µL and water=3 µL). Gene expression levels were calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method (2931). Messenger RNA (mRNA) levels were normalized relative to the housekeeping gene (GAPDH) and expressed as fold change relative to the LFD-CO control group, which was set as 1.

Statistics

All data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism version 9. Two-way ANOVA analysis was performed to determine the effects of ‘diet’ and ‘exposure’ and an interaction effect between diet and exposure. Multiple comparison testing using Tukey’s post-hoc test with p-value adjustment was performed for group comparisons. For all analysis, significance was set at p <0.05 with a 95% confidence level (32). In the event of high data variability in a group, an outlier test was performed using the ROUT method with false discovery rate (FDR) set at 0.1% (33). Lists of p-values generated from the statistical analyses for all experimental endpoints are provided in Supplemental Tables 3-8.

Results

Effects of Aroclor 1260 and HFD on body composition and food consumption

Food consumption and body weights of study animals were collected initially and continued biweekly throughout the study period. Similar to our previous reports (11), HFD-fed mice exhibited a significant increase in body weight gain compared to LFD-fed mice while Aroclor 1260 had no effect in either diet group (Figure 2A and Supplemental Figure 1A). Likewise, HFD-fed mice also showed significantly higher food consumption per mouse per day compared to LFD-fed mice (Supplemental Figure 1B). Body composition including fat and lean mass was measured using DEXA scan on week 23 of the study period. As expected, HFD-fed mice had significantly higher total fat mass and percent body fat (Figures 2B, C), in addition to higher lean tissue mass (Supplemental Figure 1C) compared to LFD-fed mice. HFD-fed mice also exhibited higher white adipose tissue to body weight ratio at the end of the study period as observed by weighing epididymal fat pads obtained post euthanasia (Supplemental Figure 1D). Further, assessment of liver weights measured post euthanasia also demonstrated that HFD feeding increase liver to body weight ratios (Figure 2D) while there was no Aroclor 1260 effect on any of the body composition parameters measured.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 (A) Body weight was measured biweekly throughout the study period and percent increase or decrease in body weight (BW) relative to the initial body weight taken at the beginning of the study (considered as 100%) was calculated. Body composition was measured at week 23 of the study period using DEXA scan to obtain (B) total fat mass and (C) % fat composition was calculated using fat tissue weight obtained from DEXA scanning. (D) Livers were isolated and weighed at the end of the study period and liver weight (LW) to body weight ratios were calculated. Values are mean ± SD; p <0.05, a - Aroclor 1260 exposure effect, b - diet effect, c - interaction between exposure and diet.

Effects of Aroclor 1260 exposure and HFD on hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and injury

Liver ultrasound was performed on week 23 of the study period to monitor for fatty liver development. Animal livers were evaluated by examining presence of roughened liver texture and increased echogenicity using this non-invasive method. While mice in the HFD groups manifested significantly higher liver echogenicity compared to the LFD-CO group (Figure 3A), Aroclor 1260 exposure also led to increased liver echogenicity in the LFD-fed mice. In concordance with the observed increased liver echogenicity for the LFD-AR group at 23 weeks, some liver tissues (n = 4) from the LFD-AR group acquired at the end of the study period (31 weeks) also displayed visible tumor burden (Figure 3B). No visible tumors were detected in the animal livers from LFD-CO, HFD-CO nor HFD-AR groups.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 (A) Liver echogenicity was measured at week 23 by non-invasive ultrasound using the Vevo 3100 Imaging System and calculated using the Vevo LAB software. Data are expressed as pixel intensity per millimeter squared area. (B) Gross images of animal livers obtained at the end of the study period demonstrated visible tumor development in the LFD-AR group. No images were taken for isolated animal livers in the LFD-CO group during euthanasia and unavailable for comparison. (C) H&E staining on liver sections were performed to assess steatosis development and (D) NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) was analyzed in each H&E-stained slide. NAS was calculated by the sum of scores for steatosis (0–3), lobular inflammation (0–3), and hepatocyte ballooning (0–2). (E) Picrosirius red staining was performed on liver sections to assessed collagen deposition and fibrosis. (F, G) Plasma ALT and AST activity levels were measured using the Piccolo Xpress Chemistry Analyzer. Values are mean ± SD; p <0.05, a - Aroclor 1260 exposure effect, b - diet effect, c - interaction between exposure and diet.

Histological staining of liver sections was performed to determine steatosis (H&E and Oil Red O staining) and fibrosis (Picrosirius red staining) development. When compared to the LFD-CO group, mild to moderate steatosis was observed in the other three experimental groups (Figure 3C and Supplemental Figure 2A). H&E sections were scored for degree of inflammation, steatosis and hepatocyte ballooning contributing to an overall NAFLD activity score (NAS) for the four groups (Figure 3D). Steatosis was significantly increased in HFD-fed mice while inflammation was significantly increased only in HFD-AR exposed mice. In contrast to our previous results with the short term (12-week) exposure, Aroclor 1260 exposure in the current study increased steatosis in LFD-fed mice. However, HFD plus Aroclor 1260 exposure showed no additional measures of steatosis above the contribution of HFD alone. LFD-AR mice also had more ballooned hepatocytes than LFD-CO mice, while a significant increase in ballooned hepatocytes was also evident in HFD-fed mice. NAS scores were significantly increased in response to both HFD feeding and Aroclor 1260 exposure (Figure 3D). Hepatic lipid assessment demonstrated that HFD feeding only led to increased cholesterol levels while hepatic triglyceride levels were increased in the HFD-AR group with an interaction effect between HFD feeding and Aroclor 1260 exposure (Supplemental Figures 2B, C). To explore the effects on fibrosis, Picrosirius red staining for collagen deposition was performed (Figure 3E). Increased collagen deposition visualized as fibrous septa was observed in the HFD groups irrespective of Aroclor 1260 exposure. Likewise, liver enzymes, namely, ALT and AST showed significant HFD-dependent increases in plasma levels but no differences attributable to Aroclor 1260 exposure (Figures 3F, G).

Effects of Aroclor 1260 and HFD on hepatic pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic gene expression

Hepatic gene transcript expression levels for various markers of inflammation and injury were assessed and fold induction, relative to the LFD-CO group, was generated as depicted in Table 1. Transcript levels for genes encoding pro-inflammatory markers namely interleukin 18 (Il-18), macrophage inflammatory protein 1-alpha (Mip1α), and macrophage inflammatory protein 2-alpha (Mip2α) were elevated with HFD feeding. Aroclor 1260 exposure showed no changes on gene induction for any of the pro-inflammatory markers measured. However, there was an interaction effect for hepatic Mip2α expression which was elevated in LFD-AR mice compared to LFD-CO mice. Expression of genes encoding proteins involved in tissue injury and regeneration including transforming growth factor beta 1 (Tgfb1), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (Timp1), matrix metallopeptidase 12 (Mmp12), matrix metallopeptidase 13 (Mmp13), and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1, Serpine1) were examined for diet and exposure-related effects. The abundance of Timp1, Mmp12, and Mmp13 transcripts significantly increased with HFD feeding only while no changes were noted for Tgfb1 or Serpine1 mRNA levels. Furthermore, transcript levels of genes encoding pro-fibrotic markers namely smooth muscle alpha-2 actin (Acta2), collagen type I alpha 1 chain (Col1α1), and collagen type III, alpha-1 (Col3α1) were examined. Aroclor 1260 exposure resulted in significantly increased Acta2 transcript abundance in LFD-AR mice compared to LFD-CO mice while HFD increased Col1α1 expression. No statistical differences were observed in Col3α1 transcripts between any of the groups.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 RT-PCR was performed to assess hepatic expression for genes involved in inflammation and fibrosis.

Plasma cytokine, adipokine, and lipid levels

With phenotypical indications of enhanced steatosis, inflammation, and underlying tissue alterations observed, circulating levels of adipo-cytokines and lipids were examined (Table 2). Plasma levels of pro-inflammatory tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) remained unchanged with diet and exposure while there was a HFD effect for increased IL-6 plasma and PAI-1 levels. With regards to adipokines, HFD feeding resulted in increased plasma leptin levels while a diet effect was also noted for plasma resistin levels but with no significant changes between groups. HFD feeding resulted in upregulated plasma cholesterol and high-density lipoproteins (HDL) levels and downregulated plasma triglyceride levels. Aroclor 1260 had no effect on any of the circulatory markers measured.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 Plasma adipo-cytokines and lipid levels were measured using either the Luminex System or Piccolo Chemistry Analyzer.

Glucose metabolism and insulin resistance

Glucose tolerance testing was performed at week 8 and week 21 of the study period. Fasting blood glucose levels for HFD-fed mice were significantly elevated at 8 weeks post Aroclor 1260 exposure (Figure 4A). These elevated levels returned to baseline by 21 weeks post exposure although the HFD-AR group still showed a trend for increased glucose levels (Figure 4B). HFD feeding led to altered glucose uptake (increased AUC) at week 8 (Figure 4C and Supplemental Figure 3A) while no differences in AUC were observed at 21 weeks post exposure between groups (Figure 4D and Supplemental Figure 3B). Aroclor 1260 exposure had no impact on glucose uptake/clearance in both diet groups. Fasting blood glucose and insulin levels were measured at the end of the study period (Supplemental Figures 3C, D). Using these values, HOMA-IR was calculated to determine insulin sensitivity as related to diet and Aroclor 1260 exposure in this model (34). As previously observed (11), HFD-fed mice had significantly higher HOMA-IR levels (Figure 4E) compared to LFD-fed mice although Aroclor 1260 exposure did not impact HOMA-IR. Analysis of QUICKI which is another measure of insulin sensitivity were consistent with the HOMA-IR results (Supplemental Figure 3E). HOMA-β was calculated to determine pancreatic β-cell secretory function (34, 35). Surprisingly, Aroclor 1260 exposure increased HOMA-β in LFD-AR mice compared to the LFD-CO group whereas HFD-AR mice had the lowest HOMA-β scores, reflecting reduced β-cell function in the Aroclor 1260 group with HFD feeding (Figure 4F). An interaction effect between diet and Aroclor 1260 exposure was also observed for HOMA-β. The higher HOMA-IR values coupled with lowered HOMA-β values in HFD-fed mice suggest hepatic insulin resistance and pancreatic β-cell dysfunction with HFD feeding, while the improved HOMA-β scores with unchanged HOMA-IR values in the LFD-AR mice suggest a disconnect between insulin secretion and glucose metabolism as seen in our previous studies (11, 36).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 Glucose tolerance testing was performed at week 8 and week 21 of the study period. (A, B) Fasting blood glucose levels were measure at both time points. (C, D) Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated based on blood glucose levels measured (post glucose challenge) over a period of 2 hours for both time points. (E, F) Homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance and β-cell function was calculated based on fasting blood glucose and insulin levels. Values are mean ± SD; p <0.05, a - Aroclor 1260 exposure effect, b - diet effect, c - interaction between exposure and diet.

Assessment of hepatic genes involved in energy metabolism, liver injury, and oxidative stress

Hepatic expression of genes encoding proteins involved in hepatic energy metabolism, oxidative stress and liver injury were assessed. Firstly, mRNA levels of two transcription factors that regulate lipid metabolism including fatty acid synthesis, namely sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor (Srebf1) and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha (Cebpα) were assessed. HFD significantly increased Srebf1 and decreased Cebpα expression while an interaction effect for decreased Cebpα expression in the HFD-AR group was also noted (Figures 5A, B). Expression levels of fatty acid binding protein 1 (Fabp1) and fatty acid translocase (Cd36) were also examined. HFD significantly decreased Fabp1 and increased Cd36 expression levels while exposure had no impact on the transcript abundance of either gene in either diet group (Figures 5C, D). HFD feeding also showed a trend for decreased mRNA levels for the enzyme involved in lipolysis, namely patatin like phospholipase domain containing 3 (Pnpla3) (Supplemental Figure 4A). In addition, HFD feeding decreased the hepatic expression of the hepatokine important for normal liver physiology, namely, fibroblast growth factor 21 (Fgf21) in the HFD-AR group (Figure 5E). Effects on bile acid metabolism were explored by examining cytochrome P450, family 7, subfamily a, member 1 (Cyp7a1), a protein coding gene for regulation of cholesterol conversion to bile acids. Notably, Cyp7a1 mRNA levels were significantly reduced in LFD-AR mice compared to LFD-CO mice, implicating potential changes in cholesterol and bile acid metabolism (Figure 5F). Lastly, hepatic expression for genes encoding markers of oxidative stress and liver injury were examined. HFD feeding resulted in increased alpha fetoprotein (Afp) mRNA levels while other markers of oxidative stress including oxidoreductase heme oxygenase 1 (Hmox1), heat shock protein (Hsp90b1), and golgi membrane protein 1 (Golm1) were either changed with HFD feeding only or unchanged between groups (Supplemental Figures 4B-E).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5 Hepatic mRNA expression for genes involved in lipid metabolism, namely (A) Srebf1, (B) Cebpα), (C) Fabp1 and (D) Cd36 were measured using RT-PCR. In addition, mRNA levels for genes encoding the hepatokine (E) Fgf21 and enzyme involved in cholesterol/bile acid metabolism (F) Cyp7a1 were measured. Values are mean ± SD; p <0.05, a - Aroclor 1260 exposure effect, b - diet effect, c - interaction between exposure and diet.

Hepatic receptor activation by Aroclor 1260

PCBs are known to activate hepatic xenobiotic receptors, including the AHR, CAR and the pregnane-xenobiotic receptor (PXR) and this is often assessed, in part, through induction of the cytochrome P450 receptor targets. We therefore examined the transcript abundance of the AHR, CAR and PXR as well as their target genes (Figure 6). Surprisingly, no cytochrome P450 induction was observed with Aroclor 1260 exposure for any of the receptor target genes which was counterintuitive to our previous findings. HFD feeding however led to decreased Cyp1a2 (AHR target gene) in the HFD-AR group and decreased Ahr expression in the HFD-CO group (Figures 6A, B). Both Car and the prototypical CAR target gene, Cyp2b10, showed no change in expression attributable to either diet or Aroclor 1260 exposure while expression of the other CAR target gene, Cyp2c29, was decreased with HFD feeding (Figures 6C-E). In contrast, HFD feeding led to increased expression of Cyp3a11 (PXR target gene) irrespective of exposure (Figure 6F). However, Aroclor1260 exposure led to increased Pxr gene expression in the LFD group (Figure 6G). Overall, these data implicated that the expected Aroclor 1260 receptor activation and subsequent gene induction may have disappeared after 31 weeks post exposure and suggest possible redistribution of PCB congeners to extra-hepatic tissue such as the adipose. A pilot assessment on adipose gene expression (Supplemental Figures 5A-F) demonstrated that while HFD feeding upregulated adipose leptin and Tnfα mRNA levels, Aroclor 1260 downregulated the HFD-induced expression of both genes. After accounting for body weight and white adipose tissue weight, leptin mRNA levels continued to be downregulated with Aroclor 1260 exposure particularly in the HFD group, implicating potential alterations in adipocyte gene expression that may need additional investigation.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6 Hepatic mRNA expression for xenobiotic receptors and their target genes namely (A, B) Cyp2b10 and Ahr (C-E) Cyp2b10, Cyp2c29 and Car, and (F, G) Cyp3a11 and Pxr were measured using RT-PCR. Values are mean ± SD; p <0.05, a - Aroclor 1260 exposure effect, b - diet effect, c - interaction between exposure and diet.

Effects of Aroclor 1260 and HFD feeding on echocardiogram

Echocardiography was performed at week 23 of the study period. These mid-study echocardiogram measurements indicated HFD-dependent alterations in cardiac function (Supplemental Figures 6A-F) including increased global longitudinal strain (GLS) and isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT). Alterations in GLS and IVRT can often precede chamber dimension differences and be predictive of cardiac dysfunction. However, no significant differences were observed with Aroclor 1260 exposure.

Discussion

A plethora of studies ranging from epidemiologic reports to model systems have correlated exposures to PCBs, inclusive of both dioxin-like and non-dioxin-like congeners, with liver disease endpoints including elevated liver enzymes, steatosis, steatohepatitis, fibrosis, and liver cancer (11, 15, 16, 37). In addition to hepatic outcomes, PCB exposures have also been associated with cardiovascular outcomes including hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, and atherosclerosis (3840). PCB disruption of the heart-liver axis has also been reported (21, 41). Established mechanisms for PCB-mediated TAFLD include hepatic xenobiotic receptor activation and subsequent endocrine, metabolic, and signaling disruption, in addition to other off-receptor target effects such as gut microbiota alterations and pancreatic toxicity (15). A considerable number of these toxicological assessments on PCB exposures and cardio-hepatic outcomes focused on shorter duration of exposures, or doses that were relatively higher compared to current environmental PCB exposure patterns. Thus, the current study was designed to further explore PCB toxicity outcomes pertinent to longer-term exposures with liver toxicity as the primary outcome, and effects on cardiovascular function as a secondary outcome. Aroclor 1260, in addition to a few dioxin-like congeners, was chosen because it most closely mimics non-occupational and bioaccumulated PCB exposure patterns, hence relevant to environmental PCB exposures today (42). The dose of PCBs used in the current study (20 mg/kg) reflected PCB doses used by our research group in previous studies (11, 12, 36, 43) which were designed to mimic the higher human PCB exposures seen in the Anniston Community Health Survey (ACHS) cohort, and PCB bioaccumulation patterns in humans seen with NHANES participants (14, 37, 44).

A major finding from the current study was the ability of Aroclor 1260 induce TAFLD/TASH outcomes, independent of high-fat feeding, when the duration of exposure was prolonged. Indeed, compared to our previous 12-week exposure studies where Aroclor 1260 exposure exacerbated steatohepatitis only in the conjunction with HFD feeding (11, 36), the current findings demonstrated that LFD-AR mice manifested increased levels of steatosis, NAS score and liver echogenicity. This suggests altered hepatocyte morphology in mice with longer duration of Aroclor 1260 exposure, without concurrent HFD administration. Significantly, some of the LFD-AR mice also exhibited liver tumors, suggestive of hepatocellular carcinoma development with longer-term Aroclor 1260 exposures. To our knowledge, this is the first report that Aroclor 1260, at environmentally relevant doses, induced hepatocellular carcinoma in a mouse model and strongly implicates how duration of exposures can lead to worsened TAFLD outcomes, even in the absence of a ‘second hit’ such as HFD feeding. However, these findings are not surprisingly given that PCBs are classified as International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Group 1 carcinogens (45). Furthermore, recent epidemiologic studies have also reported associations between chronic PCB exposures and risk for liver cancer (46, 47).

Evaluation of potential mechanisms that may have played a role in PCB-mediated toxicity in the LFD-AR mice, including classic hepatic PCB receptor activation of CAR and PXR was not observed, although hepatic Pxr gene expression was increased. Moreover, neither increased insulin resistance nor significant pro-inflammatory cytokine induction (except for Mip2α) was observed. However, the LFD-AR mice exhibited increased hepatic transcript levels for the pro-fibrotic marker Acta2, suggesting a potential response to activated hepatic stellate cells which could occur during periods of liver tissue injury and recovery. Further, the transcript abundance for Cyp7a1, which catalyzes a rate-limiting step of bile acid synthesis, was reduced in our LFD-fed mice with Aroclor 1260 exposure. Recently, Cyp7a1 has been explored as a potential target for NAFLD and HCC prognosis and therapeutic options (48, 49). Based on the reduction in Cyp7a1 enzyme in our LFD-AR mice, we expected to see hypercholesterolemia; however, plasma cholesterol, triglycerides, and high-density lipoproteins were unaffected by Aroclor 1260 exposure particularly in the LFD-fed group. The impact of longer-term Aroclor 1260 exposure on FXR activity and bile acid metabolism, and how this may contribute to worsened TAFLD outcomes requires more in-depth analyses. Nonetheless, PCB exposures have been associated with human hepatocellular carcinoma development (46, 50). Intriguingly, pathway enrichment analysis and liquid liver biopsy generated from the differentially expressed circulating microRNAs associated with PCB exposures in the ACHS population demonstrated activation of hepatocellular carcinoma-associated pathways involving the tumor suppressor P53 (3). Overall, the mechanisms responsible for the observed PCB-associated hepatocellular carcinoma development in the current study, particularly focusing on carcinogenic pathways, are currently being investigated and findings will be disseminated in a separate publication.

Our previous 12-week study demonstrated increased circulating cholesterol and HDL levels with HFD feeding while triglyceride levels were unchanged (11). However, in the current study, HFD feeding also downregulated triglyceride levels which could be partially explained by enhanced lipid uptake to the liver (increased Cd36 expression) in the HFD groups. Another notable finding in the current study is the lack of worsened steatohepatitis and fibrosis with longer-term Aroclor 1260 exposure with concurrent HFD feeding. While this observation contradicted our experimental hypothesis, it implicated the importance of considering redistribution of these lipophilic toxicants with time, especially in the context of high-fat intake and increased adiposity. In comparison to our previous 12-week exposure studies where hepatic proteomics findings indicated initiation of molecular mechanisms for liver fibrosis by Aroclor 1260 in HFD-fed mice (18), in the current study, no significant histological fibrosis was apparent with Aroclor 1260 exposure in HFD-fed mice. Although HFD feeding resulted in collagen deposition and fibrotic filaments in hepatic sections and increased transcript abundance of pro-fibrotic markers, Aroclor 1260 exposure did not exacerbated these endpoints. Previously, our group demonstrated that Aroclor 1260 indirectly activated hepatic stellate cells in vitro via hepatocyte-derived TGFβ and suggested this as a potential mechanism contributing to diet-induced steatohepatitis (18). In the current study, hepatocyte derived Tgfb1 mRNA levels were not changed in response to either HFD or Aroclor 1260 exposure although a significant increase in Timp1 and matrix metalloproteinases (Mmp12 and Mmp13) expression was seen with HFD administration. Hepatic receptor activation was also absent in the Aroclor 1260-exposed mice, regardless of diet. While one explanation for this could be redistribution of PCBs to the adipose tissue or other compartments with time, another alternative explanation could be the single-dose administration of Aroclor 1260, so that the PCB congeners may have been metabolized with longer duration of exposure. Nonetheless, the majority of PCB congeners that constitute Aroclor 1260 are higher molecular weight congeners that are resistant to metabolism and bioaccumulate (12); however, there is no clear association between circulating levels of persistent organic pollutants and body fat mass (51), or how duration of exposure and time can influence this association. Therefore, analysis of tissue and circulating chemical levels are necessary to obtain a more comprehensive understanding in this area.

Other potential mechanisms currently postulated for both the worsened TAFLD outcomes with Aroclor 1260 exposure alone, and the absence of advanced fibrosis with HFD feeding, include evaluation of the C/EBP family of transcription factors and how PCBs modulate their expression or functionality in the context of steatohepatitis. Previously we reported that C/EBPα, C/EBPβ, and C/EBPδ were upregulated by Aroclor 1260 exposure but that PCB-HFD interactions downregulated C/EBPβ (18). In the current study, hepatic C/EBPα was downregulated with HFD feeding and an interaction effect between diet and exposure was observed. Importantly, the HFD-AR group also manifested increased hepatic triglyceride levels which may be associated with the downregulated hepatic Cebpα expression. Therapeutically, upregulated C/EBPα prevents tumor progression in advanced stages of human hepatocellular carcinoma and in various mouse tumor models (5254), and deficient hepatic C/EBPα expression led to increased liver triglyceride accumulation in ob/ob mice (55). C/EBPα transcriptional regulation of genes involved in immune and inflammatory responses could be an indirect mechanism for PCB mediated liver toxicity when combined with overnutrition or hyper-caloric diets. Furthermore, limited information also exists for how overnutrition and PCB environmental exposures affect the epigenome (5658) or epitranscriptome (59, 60). Our group recently identified 22 post-translational RNA modifications in mouse livers experimentally exposed to HFD and PCBs (PCB 126, Aroclor 1260, or PCB 126 + Aroclor 1260) for 12 weeks with 10 RNA modifications being statistically significant for PCB plus HFD-exposure when compared against diet alone (61). While these newer mechanisms of PCB toxicity are encouraging, further research is required in these areas to better understand PCB exposures and fibrosis development in conjunction with overnutrition.

The current findings provided novel insight into how PCB-mediated hepatotoxicity unfolds with time which is a major strength of the study; however, the study is not without limitations. Firstly, the study only examined C57BL/6J male mice and did not consider how biological sex could impact these findings. Our previous studies on PCBs and sex differences have suggested that females may be more susceptible to PCB-mediated hepatotoxicity, and that Aroclor 1260 exposure promoted anti-estrogenic effects in both sexes (62). Additionally, Mayes et al. demonstrated more severe liver toxicity in females as compared to males in their studies examining chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity of four different polychlorinated biphenyl mixtures including Aroclor 1260 (63). To address this limitation, examination of prolonged PCB exposures in male and female models will be performed as a future direction. Another major limitation in the study is the introduction of experimental stressors including use of anesthesia, echocardiogram assessment and DEXA scan measurements during the study period (6466). In addition to inducing changes in normal physiological responses such as body weight gain (Supplemental Figure 7), these experiments also required changes in animal housing facility during the mid-study period that could have potentially impacted gut microbiota composition and energy metabolism for these experimental animals. Furthermore, the effects of aging were not considered when analyzing the current longer-term toxicity indices, and age-adjustment will be performed in our future longer-term exposure studies. In addition, PCB measurements in the liver, plasma, and adipose tissue were not measured to assess PCB redistribution with time and with increased adiposity. These measurements are being performed and will shed further light on this topic. Lastly, a thorough assessment of cardiovascular parameters was not carried out in the current study. While the initial echocardiogram results suggest subtle or no PCB effects on the measured cardiovascular outcomes other than HFD effects, further investigation of longer-term PCB effects on cardio-metabolic endpoints including cardiac gene expression, vascular endothelial function, and physiology are warranted.

In summary, our study characterized the hepatic phenotype and accompanying metabolic disruptions including altered de novo lipogenesis, lipid transport and storage, and promotion of fibrotic markers in mice concurrently exposed to dietary insult (HFD) and an environmentally relevant PCB mixture (Aroclor 1260). Hepatic tumors visualized in our LFD-AR mice were an unexpected finding and carcinogenic mechanisms are currently being investigated. A clearer picture of PCB metabolism, congener specific bioaccumulation patterns, and site-specific toxicity is necessary to fully understand metabolic disruptions seen with PCB exposure and how the mitigating factors of biological sex, hyper-caloric diets, length of exposure or conformational structure of PCBs work collectively to progress TAFLD to TASH and lead to chronic liver injury outcomes such as fibrosis, cirrhosis, or cancer. Continued research focusing on epigenetic and epitranscriptomic regulation of the hepatic proteome and crosstalk between the liver, gut, adipose, and multiple organ systems can further our knowledge on how endocrine and metabolism disrupting chemicals that are still present in our environment may continue to affect underlying health and disease pathologies. Importantly, how do these chemicals along with lifestyle factors such as hyper-caloric intake, alcohol consumption, smoking, etc. work together to compromise human health? Future studies in our laboratory will explore these complicated lifestyle factors and environmental exposure interactions.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by University of Louisville Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Author contributions

The authors contributed as follows: KH: methodology, investigation, visualization, formal analysis, writing - original draft preparation, writing - review and editing. OB: formal analysis, writing - review and editing. TG: investigation, formal analysis. MT: investigation, formal analysis, visualization. YL: investigation, formal analysis, visualization. TA: formal analysis. SJ: formal analysis, funding acquisition. CK: writing - review and editing. MC: conceptualization, project administration, resources, supervision, funding acquisition, writing - review and editing. BW: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, visualization, formal analysis, supervision, funding acquisition, writing - original draft preparation, writing - review and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This research was supported, in part, by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R35ES028373, R01ES032189, K01ES033289, T32ES011564, P42ES023716, P30ES030283 and R21ES031510); the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P20GM113226 and P30GM127607); the National Institutes of Health Office of the Director (S10OD025178); and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (P50AA024337).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the University of Louisville Hepatobiology and Toxicology COBRE and University of Louisville Center for Cardiometabolic Science for use of core facilities. Additionally, the technical assistance provided by Jian Jin, Jane C. Frimodig, Sydney E. Smith, Yunhuan Liu, and Kenneth R. Brittian, is kindly acknowledged.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgstr.2023.1180712/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Raffetti E, Donato F, Speziani F, Scarcella C, Gaia A, Magoni M. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) exposure and cardiovascular, endocrine and metabolic diseases: a population-based cohort study in a north Italian highly polluted area. Environ Int (2018) 120:215–22. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.08.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Silverstone AE, Rosenbaum PF, Weinstock RS, Bartell SM, Foushee HR, Shelton C, et al. Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) exposure and diabetes: results from the anniston community health survey. Environ Health Perspect (2012) 120(5):727–32. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104247

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Cave MC, Pinkston CM, Rai SN, Wahlang B, Pavuk M, Head KZ, et al. Circulating MicroRNAs, polychlorinated biphenyls, and environmental liver disease in the anniston community health survey. Environ Health Perspect (2022) 130(1):17003. doi: 10.1289/EHP9467

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Toxicological profile for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service (2000). Available at: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp17.pdf.

Google Scholar

5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Current intelligence bulletin 7: polychlorinated (PCBs) (1975). Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/78-127/78127_7.html.

Google Scholar

6. Casey A, Bush B, Carpenter DO. PCBs in indoor air and human blood in pittsfield, Massachusetts. Chemosphere (2022) 293:133551. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133551

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Stahl LL, Snyder BD, McCarty HB, Kincaid TM, Olsen AR, Cohen TR, et al. Contaminants in fish from U.S. rivers: probability-based national assessments. Sci Total Environ (2023) 861:160557. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160557

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Wu B, Guo X, Feng L, Gao J, Xia W, Xie P, et al. Combined exposure to multiple dioxins and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls on hypertension among US adults in NHANES: a cross-sectional study under three statistical models. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int (2022) 30(11):28730–744. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24271-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Ododo MM, Wabalo BK. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and their impacts on human health: a review. J Environ Pollut Hum Health (2019) 7(2):73–7. doi: 10.12691/jephh-7-2-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Gonzalez N, Marques M, Nadal M, Domingo JL. Meat consumption: which are the current global risks? a review of recent (2010-2020) evidences. Food Res Int (2020) 137:109341. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109341

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Wahlang B, Song M, Beier JI, Cameron Falkner K, Al-Eryani L, Clair HB, et al. Evaluation of aroclor 1260 exposure in a mouse model of diet-induced obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol (2014) 279(3):380–90. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2014.06.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Wahlang B, Falkner KC, Clair HB, Al-Eryani L, Prough RA, States JC, et al. Human receptor activation by aroclor 1260, a polychlorinated biphenyl mixture. Toxicol Sci (2014) 140(2):283–97. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfu083

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. National Toxicology P. NTP toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of 3,3',4,4',5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB 126) (CAS no. 57465-28-8) in female Harlan sprague-dawley rats (Gavage studies). Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser (2006) 520):4–246.

Google Scholar

14. McFarland VA, Clarke JU. Environmental occurrence, abundance, and potential toxicity of polychlorinated biphenyl congeners: considerations for a congener-specific analysis. Environ Health Perspect (1989) 81:225–39. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8981225

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Wahlang B, Hardesty JE, Jin J, Falkner KC, Cave MC. Polychlorinated biphenyls and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Curr Opin Toxicol (2019) 14:21–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cotox.2019.06.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Wahlang B, Beier JI, Clair HB, Bellis-Jones HJ, Falkner KC, McClain CJ, et al. Toxicant-associated steatohepatitis. Toxicol Pathol (2013) 41(2):343–60. doi: 10.1177/0192623312468517

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Petriello MC, Newsome B, Hennig B. Influence of nutrition in PCB-induced vascular inflammation. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int (2014) 21(10):6410–8. doi: 10.1007/s11356-013-1549-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Hardesty JE, Wahlang B, Falkner KC, Shi HX, Jin J, Zhou Y, et al. Proteomic analysis reveals novel mechanisms by which polychlorinated biphenyls compromise the liver promoting diet-induced steatohepatitis. J Proteome Res (2019) 18(4):1582–94. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00886

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Audam TN, Howard CM, Garrett LF, Zheng YW, Bradley JA, Brittian KR, et al. Cardiac PANK1 deletion exacerbates ventricular dysfunction during pressure overload. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (2021) 321(4):H784–H97. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00411.2021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Zelko IN, Dassanayaka S, Malovichko MV, Howard CM, Garrett LF, Uchida S, et al. Chronic benzene exposure aggravates pressure overload-induced cardiac dysfunction. Toxicol Sci (2021) 185(1):64–76. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfab125

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Wahlang B, Perkins JT, Petriello MC, Hoffman JB, Stromberg AJ, Hennig B. A compromised liver alters polychlorinated biphenyl-mediated toxicity. Toxicology (2017) 380:11–22. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2017.02.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Allison DB, Paultre F, Maggio C, Mezzitis N, Pi-Sunyer FX. The use of areas under curves in diabetes research. Diabetes Care (1995) 18(2):245–50. doi: 10.2337/diacare.18.2.245

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia (1985) 28(7):412–9. doi: 10.1007/BF00280883

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Katz A, Nambi SS, Mather K, Baron AD, Follmann DA, Sullivan G, et al. Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index: a simple, accurate method for assessing insulin sensitivity in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2000) 85(7):2402–10. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.7.6661

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Junqueira LC, Bignolas G, Brentani RR. Picrosirius staining plus polarization microscopy, a specific method for collagen detection in tissue sections. Histochem J (1979) 11(4):447–55. doi: 10.1007/bf01002772

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Brunt EM, Kleiner DE, Wilson LA, Belt P, Neuschwander-Tetri BA. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score and the histopathologic diagnosis in NAFLD: distinct clinicopathologic meanings. Hepatology (2011) 53(3):810–20. doi: 10.1002/hep.24127

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol (1959) 37(8):911–7. doi: 10.1139/o59-099

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem (1957) 226(1):497–509. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)64849-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-delta delta C(T)) method. Methods (2001) 25(4):402–8. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative c-T method. Nat Protoc (2008) 3(6):1101–8. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.73

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res (2001) 29(9):e45. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Motulsky HJ, Brown RE. Detecting outliers when fitting data with nonlinear regression - a new method based on robust nonlinear regression and the false discovery rate. BMC Bioinf (2006) 7:123. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-123

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and β-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia (1985) 28(7):412–9. doi: 10.1007/BF00280883

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Beamish CA, Gaber AO, Fraga DW, Hamilton DJ, Sabek OM. Pretransplant HOMA-β is predictive of insulin independence in 7 patients with chronic pancreatitis undergoing islet autotransplantation. Transplant Direct (2022) 8(10):e1367. doi: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001367

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Wahlang B, Prough RA, Falkner KC, Hardesty JE, Song M, Clair HB, et al. Polychlorinated biphenyl-xenobiotic nuclear receptor interactions regulate energy metabolism, behavior, and inflammation in non-alcoholic-Steatohepatitis. Toxicol Sci (2016) 149(2):396–410. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfv250

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Cave M, Appana S, Patel M, Falkner KC, McClain CJ, Brock G. Polychlorinated biphenyls, lead, and mercury are associated with liver disease in American adults: NHANES 2003-2004. Environ Health Perspect (2010) 118(12):1735–42. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002720

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Petriello MC, Brandon JA, Hoffman J, Wang C, Tripathi H, Abdel-Latif A, et al. Dioxin-like PCB 126 increases systemic inflammation and accelerates atherosclerosis in lean LDL receptor-deficient mice. Toxicol Sci (2018) 162(2):548–58. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfx275

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Raffetti E, Donato F, De Palma G, Leonardi L, Sileo C, Magoni M. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and risk of hypertension: a population-based cohort study in a north Italian highly polluted area. Sci Total Environ (2020) 714:136660. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136660

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Donat-Vargas C, Akesson A, Tornevi A, Wennberg M, Sommar J, Kiviranta H, et al. Persistent organochlorine pollutants in plasma, blood pressure, and hypertension in a longitudinal study. Hypertension (2018) 71(6):1258–68. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10691

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Wahlang B, Barney J, Thompson B, Wang C, Hamad OM, Hoffman JB, et al. Editor's highlight: PCB126 exposure increases risk for peripheral vascular diseases in a liver injury mouse model. Toxicol Sci (2017) 160(2):256–67. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfx180

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Wolff MS, Fischbein A, Rosenman KD, Levin SM. Pattern designation of PCBs in human samples. Chemosphere (1986) 15(3):301–7. doi: 10.1016/0045-6535(86)90023-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Shi H, Hardesty JE, Jin J, Head KZ, Falkner KC, Cave MC, et al. Concentration dependence of human and mouse aryl hydrocarbon receptor responsiveness to polychlorinated biphenyl exposures: implications for aroclor mixtures. Xenobiotica (2019) 49(12):1414–22. doi: 10.1080/00498254.2019.1566582

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. National Toxicology Program. Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of a binary mixture of 3,3',4,4',5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB 126) (Cas no. 57465-28-8) and 2,2',4,4',5,5'-hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB 153) (CAS no. 35065-27-1) in female Harlan sprague-dawley rats (gavage studies). Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser (2006) 530):1–258.

Google Scholar

45. Polychlorinated biphenyls and polybrominated biphenyls. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum (2016) 107:9–500.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

46. Niehoff NM, Zabor EC, Satagopan J, Widell A, O'Brien TR, Zhang M, et al. Prediagnostic serum polychlorinated biphenyl concentrations and primary liver cancer: a case-control study nested within two prospective cohorts. Environ Res (2020) 187:109690. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109690

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Deen L, Hougaard KS, Clark A, Meyer HW, Frederiksen M, Gunnarsen L, et al. Cancer risk following residential exposure to airborne polychlorinated biphenyls: a Danish register-based cohort study. Environ Health Perspect (2022) 130(10):107003. doi: 10.1289/EHP10605

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Wu C, Zhou Y, Wang M, Dai G, Liu X, Lai L, et al. Bioinformatics analysis explores potential hub genes in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Front Genet (2021) 12:772487. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.772487

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Wruck W, Adjaye J. Meta-analysis reveals up-regulation of cholesterol processes in non-alcoholic and down-regulation in alcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Hepatol (2017) 9(8):443–54. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i8.443

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Donato F, Moneda M, Portolani N, Rossini A, Molfino S, Ministrini S, et al. Polychlorinated biphenyls and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in the population living in a highly polluted area in Italy. Sci Rep (2021) 11(1):3064. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82657-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Rönn M, Lind L, Bv B, Salihovic S, Michaëlsson K, Lind PM. Circulating levels of persistent organic pollutants associate in divergent ways to fat mass measured by DXA in humans. Chemosphere (2011) 85(3):335–43. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.06.095

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Tao LL, Zhai YZ, Ding D, Yin WH, Liu XP, Yu GY. The role of C/EBP-alpha expression in human liver and liver fibrosis and its relationship with autophagy. Int J Clin Exp Pathol (2015) 8(10):13102–7.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

53. Lourenco AR, Coffer PJ. A tumor suppressor role for C/EBPalpha in solid tumors: more than fat and blood. Oncogene (2017) 36(37):5221–30. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.151

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Hashimoto A, Sarker D, Reebye V, Jarvis S, Sodergren MH, Kossenkov A, et al. Upregulation of C/EBPalpha inhibits suppressive activity of myeloid cells and potentiates antitumor response in mice and patients with cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2021) 27(21):5961–78. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0986

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Matsusue K, Gavrilova O, Lambert G, Brewer HB Jr., Ward JM, Inoue Y, et al. Hepatic CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha mediates induction of lipogenesis and regulation of glucose homeostasis in leptin-deficient mice. Mol Endocrinol (2004) 18(11):2751–64. doi: 10.1210/me.2004-0213

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Casati L, Sendra R, Colciago A, Negri-Cesi P, Berdasco M, Esteller M, et al. Polychlorinated biphenyls affect histone modification pattern in early development of rats: a role for androgen receptor-dependent modulation? Epigenomics (2012) 4(1):101–12. doi: 10.2217/epi.11.110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Curtis SW, Cobb DO, Kilaru V, Terrell ML, Marder ME, Barr DB, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation differences and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) exposure in a US population. Epigenetics (2021) 16(3):338–52. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2020.1795605

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Pittman GS, Wang X, Campbell MR, Coulter SJ, Olson JR, Pavuk M, et al. Dioxin-like compound exposures and DNA methylation in the anniston community health survey phase II. Sci Total Environ (2020) 742:140424. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140424

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Cayir A, Byun H-M, Barrow TM. Environmental epitranscriptomics. Environ Res (2020) 189:109885. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109885

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Malovic E, Ealy A, Kanthasamy A, Kanthasamy AG. Emerging roles of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) epitranscriptomics in toxicology. Toxicol Sci (2021) 181(1):13–22. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfab021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Klinge CM, Piell KM, Petri BJ, He LQ, Zhang X, Pan JM, et al. Combined exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and high-fat diet modifies the global epitranscriptomic landscape in mouse liver. Environ Epigenet (2021) 7(1). doi: 10.1093/eep/dvab008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Wahlang B, Jin J, Hardesty JE, Head KZ, Shi H, Falkner KC, et al. Identifying sex differences arising from polychlorinated biphenyl exposures in toxicant-associated liver disease. Food Chem Toxicol (2019) 129:64–76. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.04.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Mayes BA, McConnell EE, Neal BH, Brunner MJ, Hamilton SB, Sullivan TM, et al. Comparative carcinogenicity in sprague-dawley rats of the polychlorinated biphenyl mixtures aroclors. Toxicol Sci (1016) 1242:1254. doi: 10.1006/toxs.1997.2397

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Humphrey LJ, Wingard DW, Lang R. The effects of surgery and anesthesia on the immunologic responsiveness of the rat. Surgery (1969) 65(6):946–51. doi: 10.5555/uri:pii:0039606069900622

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Wagner F, Radermacher P, Stahl W. Anesthesia and the immune response: evidence for an "isolflurane paradox"? Shock (2010) 34(4):437–8. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3181d883ab

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Walton B. Effects of anaesthesia and surgery on immune status. Br J Anaesth (1979) 51(1):37–43. doi: 10.1093/bja/51.1.37

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Aroclor 1260, PCBs, NAFLD, TAFLD, steatohepatitis, hepatocellular carcinoma

Citation: Head KZ, Bolatimi OE, Gripshover TC, Tan M, Li Y, Audam TN, Jones SP, Klinge CM, Cave MC and Wahlang B (2023) Investigating the effects of long-term Aroclor 1260 exposure on fatty liver disease in a diet-induced obesity mouse model. Front. Gastroenterol. 2:1180712. doi: 10.3389/fgstr.2023.1180712

Received: 06 March 2023; Accepted: 28 April 2023;
Published: 12 May 2023.

Edited by:

Juliane Beier, University of Pittsburgh, United States

Reviewed by:

Nirajan Shrestha, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States
Sayee Anakk, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States

Copyright © 2023 Head, Bolatimi, Gripshover, Tan, Li, Audam, Jones, Klinge, Cave and Wahlang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Matthew C. Cave, bWF0dC5jYXZlQGxvdWlzdmlsbGUuZWR1; Banrida Wahlang, YmFucmlkYS53YWhsYW5nQGxvdWlzdmlsbGUuZWR1

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.