AUTHOR=DiLeo Daniel Anthony , Zenger Cameron , Quarta Giulio TITLE=Influence of pre-endoscopic duration of esophageal food impaction on endoscopy time and postprocedure adverse events JOURNAL=Frontiers in Gastroenterology VOLUME=1 YEAR=2022 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/gastroenterology/articles/10.3389/fgstr.2022.935447 DOI=10.3389/fgstr.2022.935447 ISSN=2813-1169 ABSTRACT=Objectives

Esophageal food bolus impaction is a medical emergency and 10-20% of impacted food boluses will require endoscopic removal. Emergent and prolonged procedures are associated with increased adverse events. We are interested in the relationship between the pre-endoscopic duration of esophageal food impaction and the duration of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) performed to remove the impacted food bolus.

Methods

Between 2010 and 2021, we examined EGD procedures performed for esophageal food impaction. Subjects were classified according to pre-endoscopic duration of food impaction.

Results

We found a positive correlation between pre-endoscopic duration of food impaction and procedure length (r=0.18). Esophageal impactions with mixed foods resulted in the longest procedure duration (p<0.05). Increasing age, male gender, and duration of impaction greater than 42 hours were significantly associated with increased procedure duration (p<0.05). Esophageal perforations, prolonged intubations, admissions following EGD, and readmissions were associated with EGD duration greater than 25.5 minutes. No adverse events occurred in patients who underwent EGD within 6 hours of symptom onset.

Conclusions

In the case of an esophageal food impaction, the time between symptom onset and endoscopy is positively correlated with procedure length and risk of adverse outcomes. We suggest that food impaction should remain an indication for emergent endoscopy. Prospective studies evaluating the safety and outcomes of prolonged time to endoscopy will further clarify the management of esophageal food impactions.