ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. For. Glob. Change
Sec. Temperate and Boreal Forests
Volume 8 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2025.1518704
This article is part of the Research TopicForest Growth in a Changing Climate: Insights from Predictive Modeling and Adaptive StrategiesView all 8 articles
Do drought and understory beech interact to influence nutrition and growth of sugar maple?
Provisionally accepted- Département des Sciences Naturelles, Université du Québec Outaouais, Gatineau, Quebec, Canada
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Hardwood forests dominated by sugar maple (Acer saccharum) at its northern limit (Quebec) are threatened by rising regional temperatures and recurrent summer drought. In a rainfall exclusion experiment, we imposed artificial drought in six maple stands where American beech (Fagus grandifolia) saplings proliferated in the understory (overstory beech presence) or were absent. Two paired plots were established in sites where beech proliferated vs those that were beech-free, i.e., covered by rainfall excluders vs left uncovered for summer 2021 and 2022. Responses to the four resulting treatments were subjected to Bayesian analysis. Dendroclimatogical estimates of annual basal area increment (BAI) produced by three canopy maples within 12 plots, together with foliar nutrients of the same mature maple trees and soil nutrient pools (ion-exchange probes, with increasing burial duration) were compared across plots. Comparisons included ordination scores for foliage (DCA1, Detrended Correspondence Analysis) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA: PC1 and PC2) for soils. Soil water content (SWC) beneath excluders was 56% of adjacent rainfall-accessible plots; beneath understory beech saplings, this deficit negatively affected maple BAI, but only in 2022. Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS) indices indicated foliar Mg insufficiency and Ca sufficiency. Mg insufficiency increased with rainfall exclusion, regardless of beech sapling presence. Rainfall exclusion reduced soil nutrient supply levels relative to controls; some supply rates (total pools, PC1, PC2, acidity) progressively increased over probe burial duration (2021: 14 to 56 days) in a diffusion-dependent manner under excluders, while reaching a plateau (equilibriumdependent adsorption) with accessible rainfall. NO3-N progressively dominated beech-free soil inorganic-N pools over time, which diminished regardless of rainfall exclusion. Likewise, soil base cations (Ca+Mg+K) remained high in beech's absence, and vice-versa for acidity (Al+Fe+Mn). Modest rainfall manipulations decreased BAI, altered adsorption processes, and shifted soil pools from endoto ectomycorrhizal dominance. Even short-term moisture deficiency in maple soils may incur further stress in already nutrient-stressed stands to initiate nutrient cycle uncoupling between foliar and soil pools.
Keywords: Acer saccharum, Basal area increment, DRIS, Fagus grandifolia, Nutrients, plant root simulators, Rainfall exclusion, Soil-moisture deficit
Received: 28 Oct 2024; Accepted: 23 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Parsons, Ghotsa Mekontchou, Shovon, Maheu and Rivest. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: David Rivest, Département des Sciences Naturelles, Université du Québec Outaouais, Gatineau, J8X 3X7, Quebec, Canada
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.