Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. For. Glob. Change
Sec. Planted Forests
Volume 7 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2024.1495771

Effects of Close-to-Nature Forest Management on Carbon Stocks in Pinus tabulaeformis Plantations in Northern China ★

Provisionally accepted
Jinmei Xu Jinmei Xu 1Huiling Tian Huiling Tian 2Zhaochen Li Zhaochen Li 1Jun Xiao Jun Xiao 3*Wenfa Xiao Wenfa Xiao 4Runsheng Yin Runsheng Yin 5
  • 1 Research Institute of Wood Industry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
  • 2 Institute of Forest Resource Information Techniques, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Haidian, Beijing, China
  • 3 Ecological Construction Project Management Center of the National Forestry and Grassland Administration, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing, China
  • 4 Academy of Forestry and Grassland Carbon Sink, Beijing, China
  • 5 Department of Forestry, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Scientifically understanding how to increase the carbon stocks of plantations under the great demand for forest carbon sinks to meet the 2.0 or 1.5 °C target of the Paris Agreement is attracting mounting attention. As one of the most promising plantation management regimes, it is pertinent to ask whether close-to-nature management could improve the carbon stocks of Pinus tabuliformis plantations in trees, shrubs, grasses, litter, and soil. This study investigated and analyzed the effects of close-to-nature management, in comparison with no human intervention, on the carbon stocks of P. tabuliformis plantations in three age-classes (10-, 47-, and 56-year-old stands) over 6 years in the Wangyedian Experimental Forest Farm of Chifeng, China. The results showed under close-to-nature management and no human intervention, the amounts of carbon stocks of P. tabulaeformis plantations were similarly ranked (soil > trees > litter > grasses > shrubs), and the trees, vegetation, and ecosystem carbon stocks of P. tabuliformis plantations increased significantly with stand age (P < 0.05). Close-to-nature management increased the annual increment of the tree carbon stock in 47- and 56-year-old stands, as well as that of the soil carbon stock and ecosystem carbon stock in 56-year-old stands, and also that of litter carbon stock in all stands, whereas it decreased both soil and ecosystem carbon stocks’ annual increment in 10- and 47-year-old stands. The annual increment of the ecosystem carbon stock was greater in 56-year-old (7.49 Mg∙hm-2∙a-1) than 47-year-old stands (5.82 Mg∙hm-2∙a-1) under close-to-nature management, but vice versa under no human intervention (56-year-old: 3.98 Mg∙hm-2∙a-1 vs. 47-year-old: 6.78 Mg∙hm-2∙a-1). This inverted response indicates that reasonable management measures could increase the ecosystem carbon stock of mature forest as defined by current Chinese age classification standards. Additionally, since the tree carbon stock of ca. 60-year-old P. tabuliformis stands is still growing, this suggests the plantation maturity of this pine specie can and should be extended to produce timber with larger diameters that sequester more carbon.

    Keywords: Pinus tabulaeformis plantations, Close-to-nature management, carbon stock, carbon dynamics, Wangyedian experimental forest farm

    Received: 13 Sep 2024; Accepted: 05 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Xu, Tian, Li, Xiao, Xiao and Yin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Jun Xiao, Ecological Construction Project Management Center of the National Forestry and Grassland Administration, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.