Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. For. Glob. Change
Sec. Fire and Forests
Volume 7 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2024.1419288

Maximizing opportunities for co-implementing fuel break networks and restoration projects

Provisionally accepted
Bruno A. Aparício Bruno A. Aparício *Alan Ager Alan Ager Michelle Day Michelle Day
  • RMRS Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Missoula, Montana, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Increasing impacts from wildfires are reshaping fire policies worldwide, with expanded investments in a wide range of fuel reduction strategies. In many fire prone regions, especially in the Mediterranean basin, fuel management programs have relied on fuel break networks for decades to facilitate fire suppression and reduce area burned and damage. By contrast, in on the fire prone federal forests in the western US, fuel management is guided primarily by landscape restoration goals, including improving fire resiliency such that wildfires can be managed for ecological benefit, and suppression is used more as a tool to shape burn patterns and less to extinguish fires. New policies in both fire systems are now calling for hybrid approaches that rely on both types of investments and efficient allocation of the alternative spatial treatment patterns:, linear networks versus patches across the landscape. However, studies that combine these strategies and examine alternative co-prioritization strategies outcomes and potential synergies are largely non-existent. Here, we analyzed scenarios for implementing both types of treatments in concert while varying the prioritization metrics for one type or the other on a western US national forest. We measured the response related to both treatment strategies including fire intersection rate, improvement in forest resiliency, and net revenue. We found that projects with benefits to both strategies can be identified and mapped independently of the implementation scenario and restoration objective. However, scenarios prioritized for fuel breaks preceding restoration resulted in the identification of more projects that met the criteria for providing dual benefits. The study is a rare example of optimizing hybrid fuel treatment projects that serve both restoration and fire protection goals with different spatial treatment designs.

    Keywords: ForSys, fuel break networks, Spatial optimization, fuel reduction treatments, Forest Landscape Restoration, Restoration planning

    Received: 20 Apr 2024; Accepted: 08 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Aparício, Ager and Day. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Bruno A. Aparício, RMRS Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Missoula, 59808-9361, Montana, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.