Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. For. Glob. Change, 16 February 2024
Sec. People and Forests
This article is part of the Research Topic Interactions Between Forest Ecological Services and Human Activities in Coastal Cities View all 4 articles

Spatiotemporal response of ecosystem services to tourism activities in urban forests

Jiadan LiJiadan Li1Xian ZhangXian Zhang1Qing GuQing Gu2Zhongchu Zhang
Zhongchu Zhang3*Kai WangKai Wang1Zhihao XuZhihao Xu1
  • 1Institute of Rural Development and Information, Ningbo Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ningbo, China
  • 2Institute of Digital Agriculture, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, China
  • 3Institute of Spatial Resources, Ningbo Academy of Planning and Design, Ningbo, China

Tourism in urban forests is rapidly becoming an increasing trend; however, rather few studies have used quantitative measurement to describe the relationship between tourism intensity and ecological functions. This study provides a practical framework that integrates ecosystem service value (ESV) assessment, Internet big data mining and spatial regression analysis to identify the spatial response of ESV and land use/land cover change to tourism activities from 2009 to 2019 in the Siming Mountain Region (SMR), a famous tourist resort located in the eastern coastal China. Results showed that between 2009 and 2019 total ESV increased by 7.1%. Nevertheless, there have been drastic transitions in land use types with function adjustments from traditional agricultural production to diversified tourism-oriented services. Significant spatial autocorrelation was identified for the patterns of ESV changes. GWR further highlighted that the relationship between ESV change and rural tourism indicators varied in space. ESV change in the core zone was negatively correlated with changes in catering service spots and recreational venues, whereas it was positively correlated with local lodgings. Ultimately, targeted recommendations and countermeasures for spatial planning and sustainable tourism development of urban forests under new circumstances were discussed.

1 Introduction

Intensifying urbanization has caused a series of profound ecological problems and posed a potential threat to regional sustainable development (Su et al., 2014; Yu et al., 2021). It has impacted the capacity of ecosystems to deliver services, which represent the welfare that humans directly or indirectly obtain from the natural environment (Santos-Martín et al., 2013; Wolff et al., 2015). Thus, assessing ecosystem service value (ESV) and investigating how it changes in response to human activities have aroused increasing interest among researchers (Costanza et al., 1997; Rudolf et al., 2012; Mitchell and Devisscher, 2022). Most prior studies have focused on ESV assessments at multiple scales from global to regional extent (Costanza et al., 1997, 2014; Bateman et al., 2013; Kibria et al., 2017), and across different ecosystems (Pendleton et al., 2015; Metzger et al., 2021; Taye et al., 2021; Li et al., 2023). Additionally, a growing number of studies are now focusing on the trade-off and synergies analysis across different ecosystem types and services (Lester et al., 2013), interactions between ecosystem service supply and urbanization (Wu et al., 2013; Helfenstein and Kienast, 2014; Su et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2023), and payments for ecosystem services (Jayachandran et al., 2017). Although various factors that influence ecosystem services have been suggested, such as social-ecological factors and land use/land cover change (Lin et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2022, 2023), there are few studies that investigate the endogenous driving force and its impacts on ecological functions within a specific study site or industry element through temporal and multi-scale analysis (e.g., tourism city, urban forest).

Tourism is a widespread activity worldwide and has expended dramatically in many countries (Su, 2011; Liu, 2018; Kaptan Ayhan et al., 2020). The impact of tourism activities on land use/land cover change and ecosystem services change remains underestimated. The current study attempts to fill the abovementioned research gap with an emphasis on urban forests. As opposed to urban regions, villages in urban forests have experienced rural recessions characterized by people leaving rural areas, population aging and adjustment of agricultural structure in the early era of urbanization (Onitsuka and Hoshino, 2018). Meanwhile, as demand for ecological functions increases, such as ecological agricultural product production, and rural entertainment and culture experience, rural tourism in urban forests has rapidly developed owing to their location advantage. There is consensus that rural tourism can help remote communities become directly involved in and benefit from tourism by generating and diversifying revenues for farmers, and helping to create a value-added market channel for local products and offer employment opportunities (Su, 2011; Dai et al., 2023). Moreover, tourism development can also improve accessibility to natural forests, and thus enhance the use value of cultural ecosystem services (Chen, 2020a). However, challenges brought by tourism are also salient and have recently aroused widespread concerns among tourism scholars and ecologists (Liu et al., 2022; Xiao et al., 2022). For instance, excessive growth of the tourism industry has posed severe threats to biodiversity in ecologically fragile areas (Saadi et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2023), causing pollution and ecological degradation (Satrovic and Muslija, 2019; Liu et al., 2021). Therefore, it is particularly crucial to quantify the positive and negative effects of increasing tourism activities on the ESV of urban forests.

Previous studies have found that tourism affected ecosystem services in two ways, namely tourism-oriented land use/land cover change (Li et al., 2020b), and the direct disruption of tourists’ behavior on the ecological process of local ecosystem (Underwood et al., 2019). In this regard, the present study investigates how ESV changes in response to tourism development from both the perspectives of land use/land cover transformation and tourism activity intensity with a special focus on urban forests in a developed eastern coastal city of China. However, the quantification of tourism activity intensity still remains a challenge, especially within the open space of mountainous area. Majority of the researches use tourism-driven land use change (Li et al., 2020a), the fluxes of tourists and tourism revenue by field survey approach to characterize tourism practices. Nevertheless, the problem of inconsistent caliber and poor timelines remains (Cai et al., 2023). Over the past decade, the use of Internet-based reservation and recommender systems has grown massively. Internet big data can be an effective supplement to traditional data sources (Li H. et al., 2020), both from the perspective of mass data from multiple sources and up-to-date effectiveness.

The Siming Mountain Region (SMR) is chosen as the case study site because it is quite adjacent to an urban district and thus is more vulnerable to anthropogenic interference driven by urbanization. It also serves as a crucial ecological conservation area and water source protection zone, as well as an attractive destination for rural tourism owing to the ongoing activities of agricultural life and cultural characteristics, natural features and diversified topography, along with the unique climatic. These elements combined to make the SMR an ideal subject for examining and quantifying the impact of tourism on ecological functions. This study aimed to investigate the response of ESV and land use/land cover changes (LULC) to rural tourism activities, with respect to their characteristics and intensity at multi-scale levels. Specifically, the study investigated the following three research questions: (1) How do ESV and LULC change in response to tourism development? (2) What are the evolution characteristics of tourism elements and their effects on urban forest ecosystem? (3) What theoretical guidance and practical reference can be developed for ecological conservation and tourist marketing strategies to promote short-term recovery as well as long-term sustainable development of urban forests?

2 Study area

Ningbo, as one of the sub-provincial-level metropolis designated by the central government, is an important port city on the eastern seaboard of China, the economic center on the south wing of Yangtze River Delta. In the sustainable development of this second largest city in Zhejiang Province, the SMR plays a critical role by serving various functions including water resource conversation, ecosystem maintenance, entertainment and cultural heritage. There are 13 towns consisting of 240 villages in the SMR, covering an area of 140,900 ha, with elevations ranging from 0 to 958 m. In 2013, the coexisting forest land of the SMR reached 92,500 ha, with a growing stock of 350,000 m3. There are four large reservoirs, three medium-sized reservoirs and many small reservoirs located in this region, with a total water storage capacity of 400 million m3. Additionally, the SMR has emerged as a famous tourism destination in the Yangtze River Delta due to its diverse landscapes and captivating attractions, including mountains, ravines, reservoirs and rivulets, local food and historic building. During the year of 2022, the number of tourists amounted to 7.4 million, generating a total tourism revenue of 2.2 billion RMB (approximately 304.9 million USD). The SMR had experienced disorderly over-development of the nursery stock industry. Later, guided by the theory of “lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets,” the local government has paid tremendous efforts in ecological remediation, developing leisure agriculture and rural tourism. Because of the changes in the focus of development, it has experienced drastic transitions of LULC and ecosystem service supply in the past decade.

The natural terrain of SMR consists of hills (110,400 ha), plains (24,000 ha) and water bodies (6,560 ha). Given that elevation is acknowledged as an important factor for the concept of rural tourism (Kaptan Ayhan et al., 2020), we divided our study area into two zones according to the elevation (Figure 1): the core zone (villages with mean elevations greater than 300 meters) and the buffer zone (villages with mean elevation less than 300 meters). In summary, the core zone contained 100 villages and the buffer zone contained 140 villages.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. The location and divisions of core and buffer zones in the SMR.

3 Materials and methods

3.1 Data and preprocessing

The main datasets used in this study were as follows: (1) Digital LULC maps for the year 2009 and 2019 with one meter spatial resolution, the results of the Second and Third National Land Use Survey, supplemented with the administrative boundary data, were provided by Ningbo Bureau of Natural Resources and Planning. The dataset was interpreted from aerial photographs and land use surveys that ensured high accuracy of the data and the analytical results. In line with the major dominant ecosystems in the study area, we reclassified the land use types into eight categories: forest, tea garden, orchard, arable land, water body, built-up land, bare land and meadow. (2) Digital elevation model (DEM) data with a spatial resolution of 30 m were provided by the Data Center for Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Academy of Sciences1 was used for topographic calculation. (3) Demographic and other socio-economic data were obtained from the local Statistical Bureau.2

3.2 ESV assessment

Costanza’s ESV assessment model is well-known globally and was used in the present study, expressed as Eq. (1). Xie et al. modified Costanza’s ESV assessment model by dividing 16 global biomes into seven local LULC types based on Chinese terrestrial systems (Xie et al., 2003), and established equivalent coefficients methods for each province of China according to the comprehensive statistical analysis using data from a survey of 700 Chinese ecologists (Xie et al., 2005). We therefore used the adjusted coefficients for Zhejiang Province to assess the ESV of SMR. According to the LULC classification in this study area, tea garden is substituted by orchards and the ecosystem service equivalent value factor of tea garden is applied to orchards (Appendix).

E S V = A K × V C K     (1)

Where VCK is coefficient for the ESV of proxy biome type “k” and Ak is its corresponding area.

3.3 Evaluating tourism intensity

In this study, we obtained tourism-oriented practice data as the key indicators of tourism activities from Dianping.com, the largest online tourism and consumption recommender platform in China. The website’s current active user number is 470 million, accounting for one third of total population in China. With such a large user base, this website not only plays a significant role in providing guidance for consumers, but also profoundly influences the reputation of destinations and businesses. We gathered all the scenic spots and tourism-related merchants along with their coordinates using Python software on Aug. 10th, 2023. After coordinate transformation and correction, we categorize the merchants into four tourism elements according to their type tags, namely scenic attractions, catering, lodgings and recreational venues. The specific terms and attributes for each element are demonstrated in Table 1. Verified by registration time and on-site visits, the final sample contains 1,009 and 2,843 rural tourism-related merchants in 2009 and 2019, respectively.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Terms and attributes for the four tourism elements.

3.4 Geographically weighed regression

Moran’s I was utilized to characterize the spatial autocorrelation of ESV and rural tourism indicators changes over time. Moran’s I was calculated using ArcGIS 10.2 software with the nearest neighbor distance matrix. Then, the GWR model was employed to examine the spatially non-stationary relationships between ESV changes and tourism activity indicators. GWR extends ordinary least squares (OLS) in characterizing the spatial non-stationarity of the parameters in different regions by incorporating spatial dimensions into modeling, and thus has been proved to be capable in explaining the relationships of variations (Fotheringham et al., 2002). It relies on a Gaussian distance decay function, where the contribution of one sample is weighed based on its proximity to the location of the sample being considered. GWR is described as Eq. (2).

y i = β v i u i + λ v i u i X i + e i     (2)

Where y i is the dependent variable; (vi, ui) is the spatial position of sample i; β is the intercept; λ is the coefficient; X i is the independent variable; and ei is the error term.

GWR was estimated whereby the optimal bandwidth is determined by minimizing the value of AIC value (Fotheringham et al., 2002). All the statistical analyses were done with the software ArcGIS 10.2.

4 Results

4.1 Dynamic LULC change and conversion

During the study period, forest, cropland and built-up land remained as three primary land use types in the SMR. In 2009, these land use types accounted for 66.2, 12.0 and 6.5%, respectively. In 2019, the percentages changed to 74.6, 7.1 and 8.0%. It was worth noting that there was a net decrease of 12534.8 ha in cropland areas (55.5% of the total cropland area in 2009), followed by tea gardens (2435.4 ha, 36.9%), meadows (923.0 ha, 83.2%) and bare land (77.4 ha, 91.2%). In contrast, forests, build-up land, orchards and water bodies all increased significantly. Forest experienced the greatest increase, 11803.9 ha in area, equivalent to 12.7% of the total forest area in 2009. According to the transition matrix (Table 2), approximately 39.1, 8.6 and 7.0% of cropland were converted to forest, orchards and built-up land from 2009 to 2019. Moreover, almost all of the bare land and meadow area were replaced by forest. Simultaneously, 2805.8 ha of tea gardens (42.5% of the tea garden area in 2009) and 1532.7 ha of orchards (62.3% of the orchard area in 2009) were converted to forest.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. The transition matrix of LULC in Siming Mountain Region from 2009 to 2019 (unit: ha).

The direction and extent of the changes in LULC was different between the two zones, as shown in Figure 2. Specifically, 67.5% of the cropland (5633.0 ha), 43.4% of tea gardens (2226.8 ha) and 71.6% of orchards (546.9 ha) in the core zone were replaced by forest. In the buffer zone, on the other hand, the transition direction of cropland was more diverse, including conversion to forest (3210.6 ha), orchards (1651.6 ha) and built-up land (1289.5 ha). The greatest disparity lied in the area changes of tea garden and orchards. The area of tea gardens decreased by 1783.0 ha in the core zone and 561.8 ha in the buffer zone, while orchard area increased by 54.6 ha in the core zone and 1454.1 ha in the buffer zone.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. LULC of the Siming Mountain Region in 2009 and 2019.

4.2 ESV changes in the SMR

Land use structure underwent substantial changes under the influence of rural tourism, leading to variability in ecological services. As shown in Table 3, the total ESV exhibited a 7.1% overall trend of increase from 2009 to 2019. Except for food production, which declined by 32.6%, values for all categories of ecosystem services significantly increased over this period. The three categories with the greatest increases were raw materials (11.6%), entertainment and culture (11.3%), and gas regulation (9.5%).

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. ESV changes in the SMR from 2009 to 2019 (million RMB).

Figure 3 illustrates the changes in the ESV of different categories of ecosystem services in the two zones. On average, the ESV changes more dramatically in the core zone than in the buffer zone from 2009 to 2019. Except for food production and waste disposal, the ESV of the remaining seven categories increased in both zones. It was noteworthy that the ESV of food production declined by 40.4% in the core zone and 26.4% in the buffer zone. The ESV of entertainment and culture in the core zone witnessed the largest increase (15.0%). These changes imply the functional adjustment from agricultural production to diversified ecotourism during the study period.

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Change of ESV of different ES functions in the two zones from 2009 to 2019 (unit: million RMB).

4.3 Spatiotemporal dynamics of tourism activities

According to Dianping.com, there were 1,009 rural tourism-related merchants in the SMR in 2009. By 2019, this number surged to 2,843 (Figure 4). Of the tourism elements assessed, the number of local lodgings experienced the largest growth of 313.5% during the study period. In contrast, the number of scenic attractions increased slightly by 20.8%. In particular, the composition of tourism elements and the pattern of the changes over time also varied between two zones. In the core zone, scenic attractions took the largest percentage among the four tourism elements in 2009, and lodgings became the dominant tourism element later in 2019. However, in the buffer zone, catering kept as the dominant tourism element throughout the study period. Especially in 2019, the number of catering merchants was 9.8 times that of scenic attractions, and 7.6 times that of recreational venues.

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Numbers of tourism-related merchants in the core zone (left) and the buffer zone (right) in 2009 and 2019.

Figure 5 illustrates the spatial distribution of tourism elements. It is obvious that there was a strong tendency of spatial clustering at the village scale. Catering service were primarily provided in the northern SMR. More specifically, they tended to cluster near Yuyao county, a satellite of downtown Ningbo. Villages with more than five recreational venues were all located in the buffer zone.

Figure 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Spatial distribution of tourism elements at the village-scale in 2009 and 2019.

4.4 Response of ESV to rural tourism activities

Moran’s I for ESV was significant with a positive value of 0.54, which was statistically significant at the 0.01 level, implying that pattern of ESV changes was autocorrelated in space and it is spatially non-stationary. Therefore, the GWR model is more appropriate to describe the spatial relationships between ESV and tourism indicators (scenic attractions, catering, lodgings and recreational venues) at the village level. The regression coefficients of individual indicator for different villages were obtained through GWR (Figure 6). It illustrates that the factors affecting ESV varied by spatial location, with both positive and negative correlations between ESV changes and tourism indicators, except for scenic attractions. The influence of scenic attractions on ESV was relatively low and insignificant. For relationships between ESV changes and the other three tourism indicators, GWR was more explanatory in the northeastern and southwestern region, while it was less capable to predict the relationship in the central part. In terms of lodgings, the coefficients increased from northeast to southwest of the region. It was noteworthy that ESV change in the southwestern core zone were negatively correlated with the changes in the number of catering and recreational venues, whereas they were positively correlated with lodgings, such patterns implied that the expansion of catering and recreational venues led to ESV reduction.

Figure 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Coefficients of GWR between ESV changes and tourism-related merchant changes.

5 Discussion

5.1 Development of rural tourism in urban forests

Tourism is not only widely recognized as an effective solution to alleviate typical socioeconomic challenges in mountainous areas, but also has important implications for the provision of ecosystem services, especially under strict land use restrictions. The SMR is an important drinking water conservation zone for Ningbo. Its important role in providing ecological goods and services, together with the complex geographic conditions in China’s mountainous areas (Lu et al., 2019), strict land use control in rural China, and the eco-environmental conservation red lines (ECRLs) restrict large-scale socioeconomic development in the SMR. Villages in the SMR experienced a serious recession, characterized by emigration of population and abandonment of arable land. In 2005, in his capacity as secretary of the CPC Zhejiang Provincial Committee, Xi Jinping proposed the concept of “lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets.” With growing demand for ecotourism, this important concept of development has provided great opportunities for villages with abundant tourism resources. As a result, an increasing number of commercial activities, such as rural homestays, agritainments and leisure farms, been emerged in various villages across China. Tourism was strongly promoted because it can be an useful way to balance ecological security and economic development, gradually become a key driver of China’s rural revitalization process (Bi and Yang, 2023).

Ecotourism development has been prioritized in many rural regions, especially for ecological conversation areas like the SMR. As opposed to western developed countries, China’s government plays a leading role in rural tourism development (Zhou et al., 2017). This involvement includes policy formulation at the central government level, and the policy implementation with specific development plans by local governments (Dai et al., 2023). The primary focus of government’s efforts has been on improving infrastructure, transportation, ecological conservation, and rural landscapes. These efforts aim to attract investments on rural tourism industry from all types of investors, with the ultimate goal of enhancing the quality of accommodation, catering services and the recreational experience. Big data technology offers a useful and effective alternative to traditional approaches for obtaining and utilizing data related to rural tourism. Our findings demonstrated that catering and recreational venues were highly agglomerated within a specific area, especially around a scenic area, providing evidence that the development of scenic spots contributes to the clustering of surrounding tourism services (Xi et al., 2014). Meanwhile, rural tourism had evolved from a single focus on visiting farms or participating in agricultural activities, into multi-dimensional experience of culture, village life and agricultural education, as suggested in related studies (Nair et al., 2015; Kaptan Ayhan et al., 2020).

5.2 Tourism-oriented land use transformations in urban forests

Previous studies indicated that tourism development could also drive shifts in local economy and service industry, which results in land use transformation (Song et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2021). Our results show that a large area of land originally used for agriculture production had been converted to natural forests and orchard for enhancing recreational functions and improving the visual appeal of landscape. Besides, there are other reasons accounting for the changes. First of all, difficulty in applying farming machinery and a shortage of agricultural labor force in mountainous areas directly caused substantial reduction in croplands and tea gardens. Secondly, cash trees like fruit and horticultural plants generate higher income per hectare than vegetables, grains and oil crops. Colored species, such as cherry blossoms, gingko trees and maple tree, are particularly favored for their distinctive aesthetic value to the landscape. Furthermore, as tourism develops, the associated increased investment in ecological restoration efforts, land remediation of abandoned land or virescence of bare land for instance, can also improve the proportion of vegetation (Wang and Dai, 2020). However, since cropland had experienced drastic loss, it is critical to conserve the remaining cropland through building multifunctional cropland and ecological agriculture for both short-term recovery and long-term sustainable development.

In terms of the tourism-driven construction in the SMA, an analysis into the changes in different categories of built-up area revealed a diminishing trend of rural settlements during the study period. This can be attributed to population emigration and the implementation of the “one house site for one household” policy. In fact, the construction of the traffic network accounted for the majority of built-up land expansion, among with the area of roads increased by 844.4 ha and 1080.4 ha in the core and buffer zones, respectively. It is evident that the local government promoted tourism development through improving the transportation network within the district other than expansion of rural settlements. These finding is accordant with previous studies which indicate that tourism development contribute to the construction of road area to maintain their touristic appeal (Currie and Falconer, 2014; Liu et al., 2018). However, deffer from rampant expansion of built-up land for catering, hospitality and residential use in most rural tourist areas (Tolessa et al., 2017; Li et al., 2020a; Pandya et al., 2023), renovation of existing rural settlement to enhance the amount of tourism facilities is commonly adopted in developed eastern coastal China (Bi and Yang, 2023).

5.3 Ecological response to tourism activities in urban forests

Large amount of studies suggested that tourism development has influenced ecological functions via socioeconomic development and land use change (Liu et al., 2018; Pueyo-Ros, 2018; Chen, 2020b). Excessive tourism development can cause irreversible damage to ecosystems, especially in areas with fragile ecosystems, such as islands (Grilli et al., 2021) and nature reserves (Zhang et al., 2023). Dramatic increase in tourism revenue, at the expense of agriculture, grass and forest, due to tourism boom resulted in deteriorating water quality in Erhai Lake and causing severe environmental problems in Erhai Lake Basin (Li et al., 2020a). Focusing on the specific study area of urban forests, our study showed that despite of the dramatic land use transformations between 2009 and 2019, ecological problems triggered by rural tourism have not yet been detected in the SMR. Instead, ESV increased profiting from strict land use polices and ecological conservation. Coincidentally, the increase in the value of tourism and leisure services, as well as low LULC change, played the most important role in ESV increasing in Huangshan Scenic Area (Zhu et al., 2019).

The identification of relationship between ESV changes and tourism-related activity evolution can thus facilitate the implementation of specific development strategies in urban forests. Response of ESV changes to tourism activities turned out to be spatially non-stationary and varied in space. The effect of scenic attractions on ESV was insignificant for the following reasons. The construction of scenic attractions is largely dependent on the natural landscape and rural culture symbols (Bi and Yang, 2023). In addition to this, ESV in the core zone increased as local lodgings increased, implying that local lodging merchants in the high-elevation areas were inclined to improve their surrounding environments. Hotel and homestay managers, as well as local government, pay much attention to harmoniously integration of architectural style, surrounding environments and leisure activity, which was consistent with previous studies (Anupam et al., 2012; Bi and Yang, 2023). It effectively enhances aesthetic and recreational ecosystem services and thus improves tourists’ experience, simultaneously reach a win-win situation between tourism development and environment preservation. Nevertheless, the expansion of catering and recreational venues in the core zone, especially urban forests with high elevations, might cause ecological degradation. Given this negative relationship, policy makers should carefully evaluate the construction plans in advance and take necessary precautions with consideration of environmental capacity and flexibility.

6 Limitations and future work

This study still has some limitations that lend to further investigation. First, the ESV assessment model adopted in this study was used to underestimate the value-added effect of ESV brought about by tourism development in urban forests, such as the increase in the values of agricultural products and entertainment requirements. More advanced models that are able to measure the dynamics of ESV and characterize their response to tourism activities in urban forests should be applied in future works. Second, the in-depth evaluation of negative impacts brought by rural tourism activities was insufficient and lacked data support. For example, dramatic transformations in agricultural structure could increase the risk of ecological degradation, unregulated restaurants might cause eutrophication in water bodies, and massive expansion of the transportation network could intensify landscape fragmentation and thus threaten biodiversity. Third, the temporal dimension was relatively limited, with a span period of 10 years that from 2009 to 2019. Actually, it covered both stages of rural recession as well as rapid urbanization and rural revitalization. Undoubtedly, there are many other factors contributing to the fluctuation of ESV and it remains a challenge to disentangle the effects of these factors from the influence of tourism development. Future works should use long-term and multi-temporal analysis to investigate how ESV responds to human activities. Lastly, obtaining tourism-related data from one single online tourism recommender platform seemed to be insufficient. Further investigation are necessary by incorporating more rural tourism indicators based on multi-source Internet platform where data are available to gain more generalizable conclusion.

7 Conclusion

Tourism is recognized as an effective driver for socioeconomic development and rural revitalization, so it has been supported and encouraged in many developing and developed countries through a range of policies. Over the past decade, such anthropogenic impacts have intensively manipulated urban forests in developed coastal cities of China. To evaluate the ecological pressures that are likely to arise from rural tourism activities, this paper provides a temporal and spatial analysis of ESV and land use change, and investigates the response of ESV changes to tourism activities in urban forests at both regional and sub-regional scales. Our results show that the forest area increased by 12.7% from 2009 to 2019 at the expense of cropland and tea garden, which led to a decline in food production service and an increase in total ESV. The patterns of ESV changes was also found to be significantly spatial auto-correlated. GWR further highlighted that the relationship between ESV change and tourism intensity indicators varied in space. Specifically, ESV change in the core zone was negatively correlated with changes in catering service spots and recreational venues, whereas it was positively correlated with local lodgings.

In conclusion, besides providing a scientific framework that integrated ESV assessment, Internet big data mining and spatial regression analysis, this study represents a valuable reference source for further research on the interaction between ecological function and tourism activities in urban forests. Urban forest ecosystems are highly ecologically fragile and vulnerable to human-driven threats along with rapid urbanization. This study concluded several policy and planning implications for management practices. First, we argue that both positive and negative impacts of tourism activities on ESV change need to be taken into account in tourism development of urban forests. More specifically, tourism resources, traffic accessibility, as well as environment carrying capacity, should be thoroughly evaluated when formulating tourism development strategies. Second, we propose that food production as an ecosystem service should be maintained for the sake of farming cultural inheritance and tourism experience enrichment in urban forests. The multifunctionality of cropland land should also be considered in urban forests to improve tourism experience and attractiveness for long-term sustainable development. Third, we suggest that tourism activities in the form of catering and recreational venues expansion need to be determined through a comprehensive and scientific assessments. Since rural recessions and transformations remain as global challenges, the present framework and practical implications can be applied not only to urban forests, but also to vast rural areas for achieving the economic-ecological balance.

Data availability statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found at: http://www.resdc.cn/http://tjj.ningbo.gov.cn/.

Author contributions

JL: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Investigation. XZ: Data curation, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. QG: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. ZZ: Data curation, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. KW: Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing. ZX: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by the Scientific Project of Ningbo Public Welfare Plan (2021S017).

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Ningbo Bureau of Natural Resources and Planning for the land use/cover data, the National Meteorological Information Center for the Daily value data set of Chinese ground climate data (V3.0), and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) for the Harmonized World Soil Database (version 1.2).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Footnotes

References

Anupam, A., Pankaj, C., and Singh, R. B. (2012). Homestays at korzok: supplementing rural livelihoods and supporting green tourism in the indian himalayas. Mount. Res. Dev. Boulder 32, 126–136. doi: 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00109.1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bateman, I. J., Harwood, A. R., Mace, G. M., Watson, R. T., Abson, D. J., Andrews, B., et al. (2013). Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: land use in the United Kingdom. Science 341, 45–50. doi: 10.1126/science.1234379

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bi, G., and Yang, Q. (2023). The spatial production of rural settlements as rural homestays in the context of rural revitalization: evidence from a rural tourism experiment in a chinese village. Land Use Policy 128, 106600–106000. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106600

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cai, C., Tang, J., He, X., and Liu, Y. (2023). The coupling coordination between tourism urbanization and ecosystem services value and its obstacle factors in ecologically fragile areas: a case study of the wuling mountain area of Hunan province, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 30, 115125–115151. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30462-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, H. (2020a). Complementing conventional environmental impact assessments of tourism with ecosystem service valuation: a case study of the wulingyuan scenic area, China. Ecosyst. Serv. 43:101100. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101100

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, H. (2020b). Land use trade-offs associated with protected areas in China: current state, existing evaluation methods, and future application of ecosystem service valuation. Sci. Total Environ. 711:134688. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134688

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., et al. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Costanza, R., Groot, R. D., Sutton, P., Ploeg, S. V. D., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., et al. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Chang. 26, 152–158. doi: 10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2014.04.002

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Currie, C., and Falconer, P. (2014). Maintaining sustainable island destinations in Scotland: the role of the transport–tourism relationship. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 3, 162–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2013.10.005

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Dai, M. L., Fan, D. X. F., Wang, R., Ou, Y. H., and Ma, X. L. (2023). Does rural tourism revitalize the countryside? An exploration of the spatial reconstruction through the lens of cultural connotations of rurality. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 29:100801. doi: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2023.100801

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., and Charlton, M. (2002). Geographically weighted regression: the analysis of spatially varying relationships. New York: Wiley.

Google Scholar

Grilli, G., Tyllianakis, E., Luisetti, T., Ferrini, S., and Turner, R. (2021). Prospective tourist preferences for sustainable tourism development in small island developing states. Tour. Manag. 82:104178. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104178

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Helfenstein, J., and Kienast, F. (2014). Ecosystem service state and trends at the regional to national level: a rapid assessment. Ecol. Indic. 36, 11–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.06.031

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jayachandran, S., de Laat, J., Lambin, E. F., Stanton, C. Y., Audy, R., and Thomas, N. E. (2017). Cash for carbon: a randomized trial of payments for ecosystem services to reduce deforestation. Science 357, 267–273. doi: 10.1126/science.aan0568

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaptan Ayhan, Ç., Cengi̇z Taşlı, T., Özkök, F., and Tatlı, H. (2020). Land use suitability analysis of rural tourism activities: Yenice, Turkey. Tour. Manag. 76:103949. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2019.07.003

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kibria, A. S. M. G., Behie, A., Costanza, R., Groves, C., and Farrell, T. (2017). The value of ecosystem services obtained from the protected forest of Cambodia: the case of veun sai-siem pang national park. Ecosyst. Serv. 26, 27–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.008

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lester, S. E., Costello, C., Halpern, B. S., Gaines, S. D., White, C., and Barth, J. A. (2013). Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services to inform marine spatial planning. Mar. Policy 38, 80–89. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.022

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, J., Bai, Y., and Alatalo, J. M. (2020a). Impacts of rural tourism-driven land use change on ecosystems services provision in erhai lake basin, China. Ecosyst. Serv. 42:101081. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101081

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, C., Fang, S., Geng, X., Yuan, Y., Zheng, X., Zhang, D., et al. (2023). Coastal ecosystem service in response to past and future land use and land cover change dynamics in the yangtze river estuary. J. Clean. Prod. 385:135601. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135601

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H., Hu, M., and Li, G. (2020). Forecasting tourism demand with multisource big data. Ann. Tour. Res. 83:102912. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2020.102912

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, J., Lu, Y., Yang, T., Ge, D., and Li, Z. (2020b). Water-based electrode manufacturing and direct recycling of lithium-ion battery electrodes—a green and sustainable manufacturing system. Iscience 23:101081. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101081

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, S., Wu, R., Yang, F., Wang, J., and Wu, W. (2018). Spatial trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services within a global biodiversity hotspot. Ecol. Indic. 84, 371–381. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.007

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Y. (2018). Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the new era in China. Acta Geograph. Sin. 73, 637–650. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804004

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, S., Geng, Y., Zhang, J., Kang, X., and Zhang, J. (2021). Ecological trap in tourism-urbanization: simulating the stagnation and restoration of urbanization from the perspective of government incentives. Ecol. Econ. 185:107054. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107054

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Z., Lan, J., Chien, F., Sadiq, M., and Nawaz, M. A. (2022). Role of tourism development in environmental degradation: a step towards emission reduction—sciencedirect. J. Environ. Manag. 303:114078. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114078

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, J., Wang, J., Wang, S., Wang, J., and Deng, G. (2018). Analysis and simulation of the spatiotemporal evolution pattern of tourism lands at the natural world heritage site jiuzhaigou, China. Habitat Int. 79, 74–88. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.07.005

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, L., Ren, Y., Zhu, D., Cheng, J., Yang, X., Yang, Z., et al. (2019). The research framework and prospect of rural revitalization led by rural tourism. Geogr. Res. 38, 102–118. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180454

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Metzger, J. P., Villarreal-Rosas, J., Suarez-Castro, A. F., Lopez-Cubillos, S., Gonzalez-Chaves, A., Runting, R. K., et al. (2021). Considering landscape-level processes in ecosystem service assessments. Sci. Total Environ. 796:149028. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149028

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mitchell, M. G. E., and Devisscher, T. (2022). Strong relationships between urbanization, landscape structure, and ecosystem service multifunctionality in urban forest fragments. Landsc. Urban Plan. 228:104548. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104548

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nair, V., Munikrishnan, U. T., Rajaratnam, S. D., and King, N. (2015). Redefining rural tourism in Malaysia: a conceptual perspective. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 20, 314–337. doi: 10.1080/10941665.2014.889026

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Onitsuka, K., and Hoshino, S. (2018). Inter-community networks of rural leaders and key people: case study on a rural revitalization program in Kyoto prefecture, Japan. J. Rural. Stud. 61, 123–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.04.008

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pendleton, L., Mongruel, R., Beaumont, N., Hooper, T., and Charles, M. (2015). A triage approach to improve the relevance of marine ecosystem services assessments. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 530, 183–193. doi: 10.3354/meps11111

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pueyo-Ros, J. (2018). The role of tourism in the ecosystem services framework. Land (Basel) 7:111. doi: 10.3390/land7030111

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rudolf, D. G., Brander, L., Sander, V. D. P., Costanza, R., Bernard, F., Braat, L., et al. (2012). Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosyst. Serv. 1, 50–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Saadi, S., Karimzadeh, H., and Rahimi, A. (2023). Complexity and the ecological impacts of tourism on wetlands ecosystem and rural sustainability: a case study of zrebar wetlands. Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 18, 22–38. doi: 10.3844/ajabssp.2023.22.38

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Santos-Martín, F., Martín-López, B., García-Llorente, M., Aguado, M., Benayas, J., and Montes, C. (2013). Unraveling the relationships between ecosystems and human wellbeing in Spain. Plos Clin. Trials 8:e73249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073249

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Satrovic, E., and Muslija, A. (2019). The empirical evidence on tourism-urbanization-co2 emissions nexus. Adv. Hosp. Tour. Res.-Ahtr. 7, 85–105. doi: 10.30519/ahtr.484287

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Song, B., Robinson, G. M., and Zhou, Z. (2017). Agricultural transformation and ecosystem services: a case study from Shaanxi province, China. Habitat Int. 69, 114–125. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.09.008

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Su, B. (2011). Rural tourism in China. Tour. Manag. 32, 1438–1441. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.12.005

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Su, S., Li, D., Hu, Y., Xiao, R., and Zhang, Y. (2014). Spatially non-stationary response of ecosystem service value changes to urbanization in shanghai, China. Ecol. Indic. 45, 332–339. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.031

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Taye, F. A., Folkersen, M. V., Fleming, C. M., Buckwell, A., and Ange, C. S. (2021). The economic values of global forest ecosystem services: a meta-analysis. Ecol. Econ. 189:107145. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107145

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Underwood, E. C., Hollander, A. D., Safford, H. D., Kim, J. B., Srivastava, L., and Drapek, R. J. (2019). The impacts of climate change on ecosystem services in southern California. Ecosyst. Serv. 39:101008. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101008

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., and Dai, E. (2020). Spatial-temporal changes in ecosystem services and the trade-off relationship in mountain regions: a case study of hengduan mountain region in Southwest China. J. Clean. Prod. 264:121573. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121573

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, H., Wang, L., Yang, Q., Fu, X., Guo, M., Zhang, S., et al. (2023). Interaction between ecosystem service supply and urbanization in northern China. Ecol. Indic. 147:109923. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109923

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, P., Wang, J., Zhang, J., Ma, X., Zhou, L., and Sun, Y. (2022). Spatial-temporal changes in ecosystem services and social-ecological drivers in a typical coastal tourism city: a case study of sanya, China. Ecol. Indic. 145:109607. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109607

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wolff, S., Schulp, C. J. E., and Verburg, P. H. (2015). Mapping ecosystem services demand: a review of current research and future perspectives. Ecol. Indic. 55, 159–171. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.016

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, K., Ye, X., Qi, Z., and Zhang, H. (2013). Impacts of land use/land cover change and socioeconomic development on regional ecosystem services: the case of fast-growing Hangzhou metropolitan area, China. Cities 31, 276–284. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2012.08.003

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xi, J., Zhao, M., Ge, Q., and Kong, Q. (2014). Changes in land use of a village driven by over 25 years of tourism: the case of gougezhuang village, China. Land Use Policy 40, 119–130. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.11.014

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiao, Y., Tang, X., Wang, J., Huang, H., and Liu, L. (2022). Assessment of coordinated development between tourism development and resource environment carrying capacity: a case study of yangtze river economic belt in China. Ecol. Indic. 141, 109125–109000. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109125

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xie, G., Lu, C., Leng, Y., Zheng, D., and Li, S. (2003). Ecological assets valuation of the tibetan plateau. J. Nat. Resour. 18, 189–196. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2003.02.010

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xie, G., Xiao, Y., Zhen, L., and Lu, C. (2005). Study on ecosystem services value of food production in China. Chin. J. Eco-Agric. 13, 10–13.

Google Scholar

Yang, L., Sun, J., Liu, M., and Min, Q. (2021). Agricultural production under rural tourism on the Qinghai-Tibet plateau: from the perspective of smallholder farmers. Land Use Policy 103:105329. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105329

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, Q., Feng, C., Shi, Y., and Guo, L. (2021). Spatiotemporal interaction between ecosystem services and urbanization in China: incorporating the scarcity effects. J. Clean. Prod. 317:128392. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128392

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, X., Zhong, L., Yu, H., and Wang, L. (2023). Sustainability assessment for the protected area tourism system from the perspective of ecological-economic-social coordinated development. Forests 14:890. doi: 10.3390/f14050890

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, L., Chan, E., and Song, H. (2017). Social capital and entrepreneurial mobility in early-stage tourism development: a case from rural China. Tour. Manag. 63, 338–350. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.06.027

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, S., Zhang, J., Hu, H., and Chen, C. (2019). Study on the value-added effect of ecosystem service values in tourism development. Res. Environ. Yangze Basin 28, 603–613. doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201903011

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Appendix

Table A1
www.frontiersin.org

Table A1. Coefficients of ESVs for each LULC type in Zhejiang Province, China (unit: RMB Yuan/ha).

Keywords: ecosystem service value, land use and land cover, tourism activities, geographically weighted regression, internet big data, tourism management strategies, urban forest

Citation: Li J, Zhang X, Gu Q, Zhang Z, Wang K and Xu Z (2024) Spatiotemporal response of ecosystem services to tourism activities in urban forests. Front. For. Glob. Change. 7:1361101. doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2024.1361101

Received: 25 December 2023; Accepted: 05 February 2024;
Published: 16 February 2024.

Edited by:

Lisu Chen, Shanghai Maritime University, China

Reviewed by:

Xin-Chen Hong, Fuzhou University, China
Renfeng Ma, Zhejiang Collaborative Innovation Center & Ningbo Universities Collaborative Innovation Center—Land and Marine Spatial Utilization and Governance Research at Ningbo University, China
Cheng Wang, Anhui Agricultural University, China
Xiuying Zhang, Nanjing University, China

Copyright © 2024 Li, Zhang, Gu, Zhang, Wang and Xu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Zhongchu Zhang, zhangzhongchu.28@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.