Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Fish Sci.

Sec. Fish Biodiversity and Conservation

Volume 3 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frish.2025.1571172

Multiple fishways mostly maintain upstream teleost movement in a south-eastern Australian river

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Department of Primary Industries, Narrandera, Australia
  • 2 Gubali Institute, Charles Sturt University, Albury, Australia
  • 3 Fishway Consulting Services, St Ives Chase, Australia
  • 4 New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Fisheries Conservation Technology Unit, National Marine Science Centre, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, Australia
  • 5 School of the Environment, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    River development affects fish connectivity, with intra-river issues exacerbated via sequential barriers. Remediation typically involves installing 'fishways' to permit upstream movements. Here we evaluated species-specific upstream fish-passage efficiencies through three sequential vertical-slot fishways along the Nepean River in Australia via paired entry and exit trapping. Species-specific water velocity preferences associated with fishway entrance were informed by restricting head loss at the entry traps but not at the exit traps. During 78 paired trap deployments 26,139 fish were caught, comprising 19 species; most of which successfully negotiated the fishways-albeit with considerable inter-and intra-specific variability among fishways. Catches of the most abundant species (38% of total), the amphidromous Gobiomorphus coxii (20-160 mm total length; TL), in the entry and exit traps were negatively and positively affected by water velocity, respectively at the second and third fishways, but not at the first. Catches of other species were also directly or indirectly affected by water velocity, with fewer catadromous Trachystoma petardi (145-460 mm fork length; FL) and Mugil cephalus recorded in entry than exit traps, implying (1) insufficient water velocity to permit entry and/or (2) confounding effects of the entry-trap design on capture. Conversely, two gudgeons (the potamodromous Philypnodon grandiceps; 29-77 mm TL and Hypseleotris galii; 31-49 mm TL) were caught in significantly greater abundances in the entry than exit traps implying some restriction to their passage and possibly due to deficits in fishway hydraulics and/or a lack of motivation to migrate in these species. The study highlights the value of location-specific monitoring for identifying key factors affecting fishway performance.

    Keywords: barriers, Vertical-slot fishway, Migration, Diadromy, fishway trapping

    Received: 05 Feb 2025; Accepted: 21 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Rourke, Robinson, Baumgartner, Doyle, Mallen-Cooper, Thiem and Broadhurst. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Meaghan Rourke, Department of Primary Industries, Narrandera, Australia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more