Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Ethol.
Sec. Social Behavior and Communication
Volume 3 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fetho.2024.1450585
This article is part of the Research Topic Ethology Today: Learning from the Past, Mapping the Future View all articles

BALANCING WELFARE AND HABITAT DAMAGE IN PIGS (Sus scrofa) UNDER EXTENSIVE FARMING: AN ETHOLOGICAL APPROACH FOR DETERMINING THE EFFECTS OF GROUP COMPOSITION AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT

Provisionally accepted
Edoardo Collarini Edoardo Collarini *Luca Capponcelli Luca Capponcelli Andrea Pierdomenico Andrea Pierdomenico Giada Cordoni Giada Cordoni *Ivan Norscia Ivan Norscia *
  • Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, School of Nature Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Piedmont, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    According to the modern perspective on evaluating animal welfare, it is important to consider both negative and positive experiences. This study investigated the impact of group composition and environmental enrichments on the behaviours of free-ranging pigs, focusing on anxiety-related behaviours, aggression, affiliation, post-conflict affiliation, excavation, and non-invasive exploration activities. Data were collected on three different groups (all-female: N=10; all-male: N=13; mixedsex: N=12) of free-ranging pigs raised in a natural woodland habitat at the ethical farm "Parva Domus" (Turin, Italy). To evaluate the impact of environmental enrichment, further data collection was carried out on the mixed-sex group under three different enrichment conditions (absence; dry leaves; straw) provided in a rotational scheme. Group composition did not affect levels of anxietyrelated behaviours, aggression and non-invasive exploration. However, it did impact other social aspects (affiliation: One-way ANOVA: p=0.003; post-conflict affiliation: Kruskal-Wallis: p=0.005).In particular, the mixed-sex and the all-male groups showed higher levels of affiliation than the allfemale group and the mixed-sex group showed higher levels of post-conflict affiliation than the allmale group. Moreover, we found differences in excavation behaviour levels (Kruskal-Wallis: p=0.001), with higher levels of excavation behaviour in the mixed-sex group compared to the allfemale group. Regarding the impact of enrichments, we found differences in levels of anxiety-related behaviours (One-way ANOVA: p = 0.046), affiliation (One-way ANOVA: p = 0.006), excavation (One-way ANOVA: p<0.001) and non-invasive exploration activities (One-way ANOVA: p<0.001).In enrichment conditions with straw, we found a significant decrease in anxiety-related, affilliation and excavation behaviours levels, and a significant increase in non-invasive exploration behaviours.A trend with lower levels of aggression was observed in straw enrichment condition compared to the absence of enrichment, although the difference was not significant. Moreover, there were no differences in post-conflict affiliation frequencies. Our findings suggest that forming mixed-sex groups and providing environmental enrichments such as the straw could be suitable solutions to effectively reduce invasive excavation behaviours without preventing pigs from expressing their natural behavioural repertoire, thus maintaining high standards of animal welfare. This study highlights behavioural aspects to be considered in the extensive farming, confirming the importance of ethology as a tool for assessing pig welfare.

    Keywords: Sus scrofa, Animal Welfare, Social Behaviour, Extensive farming, habitat destruction

    Received: 17 Jun 2024; Accepted: 23 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Collarini, Capponcelli, Pierdomenico, Cordoni and Norscia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Edoardo Collarini, Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, School of Nature Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, 10123, Piedmont, Italy
    Giada Cordoni, Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, School of Nature Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, 10123, Piedmont, Italy
    Ivan Norscia, Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, School of Nature Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, 10123, Piedmont, Italy

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.