Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Environ. Sci.

Sec. Environmental Systems Engineering

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2025.1563488

The knowns and unknowns in our understanding of how plastics impact climate change: A systematic review

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada
  • 2 University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 3 World Resources Institute, Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Plastic pollution and climate change are two major environmental issues of this century, with implications for ecosystem health, the economy, and humankind. Plastics have the potential to affect the climate in multiple ways, yet we lack a thorough understanding of what data we have on this phenomenon and where the knowledge gaps are. Here, we conducted a systematic review to assemble knowledge and answer the question: How do plastics impact climate through three major mechanisms – emissions of greenhouse gases across the plastics lifecycle, interference with Earth’s carbon sinks, and interference with Earth’s radiation budget? We searched through all 14 databases in Web of Science for relevant articles, and amended this pool with articles from manual reference searching and expert elicitations. Using rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria, including the exclusion of non-peer reviewed studies to minimize risk of bias, we ultimately selected 143 articles for our review - 36 lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions papers, 83 carbon sink papers, and 24 radiation budget papers. Based on current available data, we found that the plastics lifecycle can emit up to two gigatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents per year, with the most emissions being produced at the primary production and product manufacture stages. From existing carbon sink studies, we identified more instances of plastics negatively affecting carbon sequestration than vice versa. From the radiation budget papers, we found that radiative impacts are predominantly cooling in nature. The body of evidence is incomplete and more research is needed to confirm these findings and fill in existing knowledge gaps. Future work should prioritize quantifying greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation, consumption, and unmanaged waste stages of the plastics lifecycle. We need more studies that examine the impact of plastics on coastal blue carbon ecosystems and marine carbon sequestration endpoints, and more studies examining the impact of plastics on direct radiative forcing via aerosols, cloud properties, and the albedo/melting rate of surfaces and ice/snow. Immediate action is required to decarbonize the plastics lifecycle, and full accounting of the climate impact of plastics is needed in emissions scenarios, inventories, and climate models across geographies and sectors.

    Keywords: Plastics, climate, Climate Change, Lifecycle, Greenhouse gas emissions, carbon cycling, Radiative forcing, Plastic pollution

    Received: 20 Jan 2025; Accepted: 17 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Zhu, Konik and Kaufman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Xia Zhu, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more