Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Environ. Sci.

Sec. Interdisciplinary Climate Studies

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2025.1525574

This article is part of the Research Topic Climate Change Impacts on Arctic Ecosystems and Associated Climate Feedbacks View all 8 articles

The Changing Face of the Arctic: Four Decades of Greening and Implications for Tundra Ecosystems

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Other
  • 2 Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States
  • 3 Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, United States
  • 4 b.geos GmbH, Korneuburg, Austria
  • 5 Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, FRAM – High North Research Centre for Climate and the Environment, Tromsø, Norway
  • 6 UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Troms, Norway
  • 7 University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
  • 8 Arctic Centre, University of Lapland, Rovaniemi, Lapland, Finland
  • 9 Goddard Space Flight Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Greenbelt, Maryland, United States
  • 10 Global Science and Technology, Inc., Greenbelt, Maryland, United States
  • 11 NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS, Tromsø, Norway
  • 12 University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland
  • 13 University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
  • 14 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, United States
  • 15 Aarhus University, Aarhus, Central Denmark Region, Denmark
  • 16 Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands
  • 17 Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Potsdam, Germany
  • 18 Ames Research Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Moffet Field, California, United States
  • 19 The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, United Kingdom
  • 20 Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States
  • 21 University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States
  • 22 Woodwell Climate Research Center, Falmouth, Massachusetts, United States
  • 23 University of Zurich, Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
  • 24 Department of Arctic Ecology, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Tromsø, Troms, Norway
  • 25 Agricultural University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
  • 26 International Arctic Research Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States
  • 27 Oak Ridge National Laboratory (DOE), Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Arctic landscapes occupy a nexus of environmental change processes, globally significant soil carbon stores, wildlife populations, and subsistence-based human societies. In response to rapid climate warming, tundra ecosystems are experiencing widespread changes to vegetation and underlying permafrost, coupled with an array of ecological disturbances that are expected to intensify in the future. Declines in the extent of the cryosphere on land (permafrost and seasonal snow) and offshore (sea-ice) raise the question of whether and for how long warmer portions of the Low Arctic will fit established concepts of ‘‘what is Arctic,” given the influence the cryosphere has historically had on tundra ecosystem structure and function. The era of spaceborne observation of circumpolar tundra greenness, in the form of the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), has entered its fifth decade and provides foundational information concerning ecosystem conditions and responses to climatic trends, variability, ecological disturbance, and successional processes. Here we review the evolving story of Arctic greening, and synthesize long-term spaceborne records of NDVI, climatic data, field observations, and the knowledge base of Arctic residents to place the last four decades of Arctic environmental change in context, and establish expectations and research priorities for the coming decade. Greenness dynamics display high spatio-temporal variability, reflecting complex interactions of climatic warming and variability, landscape history, ecological disturbance, and other factors. Nonetheless, long-term increases in NDVI—commonly known as “the greening of the Arctic”—remain prominent across large areas in all available long-term spaceborne datasets and align with long-term shifts in vegetation structure documented in disparate Arctic regions. Common shifts reported from the Low Arctic, such as shrubification, generally portend declines in floristic diversity, and shifts in fauna that favor boreal forest species. Despite lingering uncertainties regarding trend attribution and sources of interannual variability, the sequence of record-high circumpolar tundra greenness values observed since 2020 provides strong evidence that Arctic tundra ecosystems have entered a state without historic precedent since at least the Little Ice Age.

    Keywords: Arctic1, tundra2, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index3, greening4, remote sensing5, climate change6

    Received: 09 Nov 2024; Accepted: 13 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Frost, Bhatt, Macander, Berner, Bartsch, Bjerke, Epstein, Forbes, Goetz, Hoy, Karlsen, Kumpula, Lantz, Lara, López Blanco, Magnússon, Montesano, Neigh, Nitze, Orndahl, Park, Phoenix, Raynolds, Rocha, Rogers, Schaepman-Strub, Tømmervik, Verdonen, Veremeeva, Virkkala, Waigl, Walker and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more