Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Environ. Sci.
Sec. Soil Processes
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2025.1500314
This article is part of the Research Topic Advances in Soil Pollution Research: Risk Assessment and Ecosystems Management View all 3 articles

Geochemical factors influencing the phosphorus mobility in Konza prairie grassland and agriculture-dominated soils in north-eastern Kansas

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
  • 2 School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Mandi, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, India
  • 3 Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
  • 4 Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The availability and mobility of phosphorus (P) in soils play a crucial role in effectively managing agricultural activities and maintaining healthy soils. Several parameters including soil texture, pH, elemental and mineralogical composition, moisture content, and soil organic matter (SOM) are crucial in controlling the movement of P in soils. This study focuses on assessing geochemical properties of soils from a pristine prairie grassland and an agriculturally dominated land, and their influence on soil P mobility. Surface soils were collected from two locations, Konza Prairie Biological Station (KBPS) located in Manhattan (Kansas) which is a native grassland ecosystem, and agricultural land in town of Hays (Kansas). Results showed that the KPBS soils contained lower water-extractable phosphate (PO4 3-P) concentrations (0.2 ± 0.7 mg/kg) than soils from Hays (1.3 ± 2.4 mg/kg). Bio-available P measured as Bray-P were also lower in KPBS (14.3 ± 7.0 mg/kg) relative to Hays (23.0 ± 23.7 mg/kg). Soils from both the sites contained water-extractable calcium, magnesium and potassium as a primary soluble component likely from carbonate minerals in these calcareous soils. The SOM concentrations measured as loss on ignition (LoI) were greater in KPBS (9.9 ± 1.8%) relative to Hays (5.3 ± 1.7 %). Water leachable dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations were also greater for KPBS (651 ± 274 mg/kg) relative to Hays (288 ± 267 mg/kg). Optical spectroscopic analyses using absorbance and fluorescence properties revealed that the water-extractable SOM in these soils was mainly of terrestrial origin, plant-derived, aromatic, and contained humic-like substances. The intensities of fluorescence peaks A, C, and M, and specific UV absorbance at 254 nm (SUVA 254) of both soils correlate strongly with the Bray-P concentrations, indicating that the source of SOM plays a vital role in controlling soil P mobility. These findings indicate that natural prairie grassland soils contained lower P concentrations that are primarily insoluble in water and associated with humic and fulvic like SOM.

    Keywords: Phosphorus, Soil organic matter (SOM), Bio-availability, land use, grassland ecosystem, Agriculture

    Received: 23 Sep 2024; Accepted: 07 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Banerjee, Kulkarni, Veach, Nagaraja, Pathak, Das and Datta. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Protik Banerjee, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Harshad Vijay Vijay Kulkarni, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Mandi, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, India
    Saugata Datta, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.