The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Environ. Sci.
Sec. Soil Processes
Volume 13 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2025.1474764
Uncertainty in soil gas permeability measurements
Provisionally accepted- Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou, China
Soil gas permeability is critical to the study of soil pore structure, soil gas transport, and crop growth. In this paper, a pressure decay method is proposed to calculate soil gas permeability based on the law of conservation of mass, which is measured and compared with the steady state method in a variety of soils, including compacted soils and soils with different moisture contents. The applicability of the two methods and the effects of compaction and water content on soil gas permeability were explored. The experimental results show that in low-permeability soils, there is a bias in the measured values of the steady state method. In contrast, the results calculated based on the pressure decay method are more accurate. Increasing the water content of the soil or compacting the soil results in a 20% to 88% or 63% to 93% decrease in soil gas permeability, respectively, with the degree of decrease correlating with the viscosity of the medium. The collective show that calculating soil gas permeability based on the pressure decay method helps compensate for the inaccuracy of the steady state method in measuring results in low-permeability soils. This leads to a better evaluation of soil aeration conditions, which, in turn, serves environmental, agricultural, and ecological research.
Keywords: soil gas permeability measurement, Pressure decay method, Steady-state method, Gas flow, numerical solution
Received: 02 Aug 2024; Accepted: 06 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Feng, Hu and Jiang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Lingxia Feng, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou, China
Junguo Hu, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.