The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Environ. Sci.
Sec. Water and Wastewater Management
Volume 12 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1473729
Assessing institutional sanitation and its impact at a citywide level: An exploration of school sanitation in the Accra Metropolitan Area, Ghana
Provisionally accepted- 1 Lusaka Water Supply and Sanitation Company, Lusaka, Zambia
- 2 Independent Consultant, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- 3 IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Delft, Netherlands
Exploring sanitation at a city scale is crucial due to approaches such as Citywide Inclusive Sanitation (CWIS). Sanitation impacts individuals, households and the whole city, as recognised by CWIS. The Shit Flow Diagram Graphic (SFDG) is the primary tool for citywide situation analysis. However, current SFDGs assume that individuals use only home toilets, overlooking the complexity of toilet usage, including public and workplace facilities. Our understanding of citywide sanitation flows is incomplete if analyses ignore the other toilets that people use, such as public or workplace toilets. This study explored the impact of one type of institutional sanitation, school sanitation, on citywide sanitation flows. To do this an overview and analysis of school sanitation at a citywide level was needed and a method to split the school pupils' excreta flows was developed. Data was collected from secondary sources (e.g. from Ghana Statistical and Educational Services), structured observations (n=26), and interviews with key informants (n=15), headteachers (n=26) and students (n=39) from across Accra Metropolitan Area, Ghana. This data was used to construct three SFDGs, which were compared using Trend Graphs (graphs used to compare the state of sanitation across the different stages of the sanitation value chain). The findings indicated that school sanitation was less safely managed than household sanitation and that SFDGs could be used assess school-level sanitation. Method development was crucial to accurately partition pupils' excreta flows. While annual flows from schools appeared insignificant citywide, this seasonal flow could adversely affect public and environmental health during school terms. It therefore may be more important to consider the school population as a whole when thinking about the impact of school sanitation. This research highlights the importance of understanding where people spend their day and how this is related to the different sanitation systems they use and highlights the need to move beyond household sanitation. This paper successfully demonstrates the level of information that is needed on people's sanitation practices, that enables their excreta flows to be split between different facilities. It could be used as a guide for future studies and the further development of methods to explore this topic.
Keywords: Citywide Inclusive Sanitation (CWIS), faecal sludge management (FSM), Sanitation Value Chain, Sanitation tools, Shit Flow Diagram (SFD), Urban sanitation
Received: 31 Jul 2024; Accepted: 21 Nov 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Nkonde, Reed, Brdjanovic and Furlong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
William Nkonde, Lusaka Water Supply and Sanitation Company, Lusaka, Zambia
Claire Furlong, IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Delft, Netherlands
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.