Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Environ. Sci.
Sec. Water and Wastewater Management
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1458153
This article is part of the Research Topic Biological Contaminants of Concern in Water and Wastewater: An Environmental Health Perspective View all 15 articles

Extrapolating empirical measurements of wastewater exfiltration from sanitary sewers to estimate watershed-scale fecal pollution loading in urban stormwater runoff

Provisionally accepted
Joshua A Steele Joshua A Steele 1*Adriana Gonzalez-Fernández Adriana Gonzalez-Fernández 1John Griffith John Griffith 1*Darcy Ebentier Mccargar Darcy Ebentier Mccargar 2Sierra Wallace Sierra Wallace 2Kenneth Schiff Kenneth Schiff 1
  • 1 Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa, United States
  • 2 WSP (United States), New York, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Inflow and infiltration are well-known issues for sanitary sewer collection systems, but exfiltration is understudied and rarely empirically quantified. The goal of this study is to estimate the potential human fecal contribution from wastewater exfiltration from sanitary sewers to stormwater in an urban watershed with separate sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems. This study uses newly developed techniques to empirically measure sanitary sewage exfiltration, then compares these exfiltration rates to human fecal pollutant loading in stormwater runoff from multiple urban catchments without other sources of human inputs (i.e., no septic systems, no homeless encampments, no reported sanitary sewer overflows) to estimate the amount of exfiltrated sewage that reaches stormwater. The human-specific genetic marker HF183, which is highly concentrated in raw sewage, was used as a surrogate for human fecal pollution and was measured in nearly every stormwater sample collected. We extrapolated measured exfiltration to the entire 419 km 2 watershed and estimated up to 4.25 x 10 6 liters exfiltrate each day. This is 0.6% of the average daily volume of sewage treated in this sewer collection system and is similar in scale to exfiltration allowed by design standards. Based on ratios of exfiltration loading predictions vs stormwater loading measurements, the proportion of exfiltrated human fecal load that is estimated to be transported via subsurface pathways (i.e. the subsurface transfer coefficient, STC) to stormwater in the studied catchments is 8.27 x 10 -5 (95% CI: 6.30 x 10 -5 to 1.37 x 10 -4 ). Human fecal pollution loads from exfiltration via subsurface transfer during a storm event were calculated to be 1.5 x10 13 (95% CI: 1.79 x10 12 to 3.59 x 10 13 ) HF183 gene copies per storm. This estimate is similar in scale to the measured mass loading estimates in stormwater for the studied watershed and comparable to independently-measured tracers of sewage. Future work is needed to better understand subsurface transport mechanisms of exfiltrated sewage and to test this approach, and the assumptions used, in other watersheds and sewer systems.

    Keywords: sewer exfiltration, Municipal separate storm sewer systems, Sewer pipes, HF183, Decay rates, flow-weighted loading

    Received: 02 Jul 2024; Accepted: 10 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Steele, Gonzalez-Fernández, Griffith, Ebentier Mccargar, Wallace and Schiff. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Joshua A Steele, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa, United States
    John Griffith, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.