Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Environ. Sci.
Sec. Interdisciplinary Climate Studies
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1433920

Landcover-categorized fires respond distinctly to precipitation anomalies in the South-Central United States

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 North Carolina State University, Raleigh, United States
  • 2 University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Satellite detection of active fires have contributed to advance our understanding of fire ecology, fire and climate dynamics, fire emissions and how to better manage the use of fires as a tool. In this study we use 12 years (2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017)(2018)(2019)(2020)(2021)(2022)(2023) of active fire data combined with landcover information in the South-Central United States to derive a monthly, open access dataset of categorized fires. This is done by calculating a fire predominance index used to rank fire prone land covers, which are then grouped into four main landscapes: grassland, forest, wildland and crop fires. County level aggregated analyses reveal spatial distributions, climatologies, and peak fire months that are particular to each fire type. Using the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), it is found that during climatological fire peakmonth, SPI and fires exhibit an inverse relationship in forests and crops, whereas grassland and wildland fires show less consistent inverse or even direct relationship with SPI. This varied behavior is discussed in the context of landscapes' responses to anomalies in precipitation, and fire management practices, such as prescribed fires and crop residue burning. In a case study of Osage County (OK) we find that large wildfires, known to be closely related to climate anomalies, occur where forest fires are located in the county and absent in areas of grassland fires. Weaker grassland fires response to precipitation anomalies can be attributed to the use of prescribed burning, which are normally planned under environmental conditions that facilitate control and thus avoided during droughts. Crop fires on the other hand, are set to efficiently burn residue and practiced more intensely in drier years than in wetter, explaining the consistently strong inverse correlation between fires and precipitation anomalies. In our increasingly volatile climate, understanding how fires, vegetation, and precipitation interact has become imperative to prevent hazardous fire conflagrations and to better manage ecosystems.

    Keywords: fires and climate interactions, fires and vegetation interactions, landcover classified fires, Precipitation anomalies, fire dataset. (Min.5-Max. 8 Deleted: When using The precipitation-fire relationship is not

    Received: 16 May 2024; Accepted: 16 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Fernandes and Young. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Katia Fernandes, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.