Skip to main content

POLICY AND PRACTICE REVIEWS article

Front. Environ. Sci.
Sec. Interdisciplinary Climate Studies
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1421850
This article is part of the Research Topic Nature-based solutions for climate change adaptation View all 6 articles

Identifying and filling critical knowledge gaps can optimize financial viability of blue carbon projects in tidal wetlands

Provisionally accepted
Tim J. Carruthers Tim J. Carruthers 1*Beaux Jones Beaux Jones 1Megan K. Terrell Megan K. Terrell 2Jonathan F. Scheibly Jonathan F. Scheibly 3Brendan J. Player Brendan J. Player 4Valerie A. Black Valerie A. Black 1Justin Ehrenwerth Justin Ehrenwerth 1Patrick Biber Patrick Biber 5Rod M. Connolly Rod M. Connolly 6Stephen Crooks Stephen Crooks 7Jason P. Curole Jason P. Curole 1Kelly M. Darnell Kelly M. Darnell 5Alyssa Dausman Alyssa Dausman 1Allison L. DeJong Allison L. DeJong 1Shawn M. Doyle Shawn M. Doyle 1Christopher R. Esposito Christopher R. Esposito 1Daniel Friess Daniel Friess 8James W. Fourqurean James W. Fourqurean 9Ioannis Y. Georgiou Ioannis Y. Georgiou 1Gabriel D. Grimsditch Gabriel D. Grimsditch 10Songjie He Songjie He 11Eva R. Hillman Eva R. Hillman 12Guerry O. Holm Guerry O. Holm 13Jennifer Howard Jennifer Howard 14Hoonshin Jung Hoonshin Jung 1Stacy Jupiter Stacy Jupiter 15Erin Kiskaddon Erin Kiskaddon 1Ken W. Krauss Ken W. Krauss 16Paul S. Lavery Paul S. Lavery 17Bingqing Liu Bingqing Liu 18Catherine Lovelock Catherine Lovelock 19Sarah K. Mack Sarah K. Mack 20Peter I. Macreadie Peter I. Macreadie 21Karen McGlathery Karen McGlathery 22J P. Megonigal J P. Megonigal 23Brian J. Roberts Brian J. Roberts 24Scott Settelmyer Scott Settelmyer 25Lorie Staver Lorie Staver 26Hilary J. Stevens Hilary J. Stevens 27Ariana Sutton-Grier Ariana Sutton-Grier 28Jorge A. Villa Jorge A. Villa 18John R. White John R. White 11Michelle Waycott Michelle Waycott 29
  • 1 The Water Institute of the Gulf, Baton Rouge, United States
  • 2 Plauché and Carr, LLP, Baton Rouge, United States
  • 3 Stantec, 3052 Beaumont Centre Cir, Lexington, United States
  • 4 Stantec, 150 Riverside Manor Blvd Suite 301, Fredericksburg, United States
  • 5 School of Ocean Science and Engineering and Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, The University of Southern Mississippi, Ocean Springs, United States
  • 6 Coastal and Marine Research Centre, Australian Rivers Institute, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
  • 7 Silvestrum Climate Associates, Sausalito, United States
  • 8 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, School of Science and Engineering, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
  • 9 Department of Biological Sciences, College of Arts, Sciences and Education, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, United States
  • 10 United Nations Environment Programme (Kenya), Nairobi, Kenya
  • 11 Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences, College of the Coast and Environment, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
  • 12 Department of Biological Sciences, Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, LA 70402 and Science Program, Pontchartrain Conservancy, Metairie, United States
  • 13 Jacobs Engineering, New York, United States
  • 14 Conservation International, Arlington, Virginia, United States
  • 15 Wildlife Conservation Society, Global Marine Program, Bronx, New York, United States
  • 16 U.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, Lafayette, Louisiana, United States
  • 17 School of Science and Centre for Marine Ecosystems Research, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia
  • 18 University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, Louisiana, United States
  • 19 School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • 20 Tierra Resources LLC, Lafitte, United States
  • 21 Biosciences and Food Technology Discipline, School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
  • 22 Department of Environment Sciences, Univesity of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
  • 23 Smithsonian Environmental Research Center (SI), Edgewater, Maryland, United States
  • 24 Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium, Chauvin, Louisiana, United States
  • 25 TerraCarbon, Peoria, United States
  • 26 Laboratory of Horn Point, Center for Environmental Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Cambridge, United States
  • 27 Restore America's Estuaries, Arlington, United States
  • 28 United States Geological Survey (USGS), United States Department of the Interior, Reston, Virginia, United States
  • 29 School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Engineering and Technology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    One of the world's largest 'blue carbon' ecosystems, Louisiana's tidal wetlands on the US Gulf of Mexico coast, is rapidly being lost. Louisiana's strong legal, regulatory, and monitoring framework, developed for one of the world's largest tidal wetland systems, provides an opportunity for a programmatic approach to blue carbon accreditation to support restoration of these ecologically and economically important tidal wetlands. Louisiana's coastal wetlands span ~1.4 million ha and accumulate 5.5-7.3 Tg yr -1 of blue carbon (organic carbon), ~6-8% of tidal marsh blue carbon accumulation globally. Louisiana has a favorable governance framework to advance blue carbon accreditation, due to centralized restoration planning, long term coastal monitoring, and strong legal and regulatory frameworks around carbon. Restoration efforts, planned through Louisiana's Coastal Master Plan, over 50 years are projected to create, or avoid loss of, greater than 200,000 ha of wetland. Current restoration funding, primarily from Deepwater Horizon oil spill settlements, will be fully committed by the early 2030s and additional funding sources are required. Existing accreditation methodologies have not been successfully applied to coastal Louisiana's ecosystem restoration approaches or herbaceous tidal wetland types. Achieving financial viability of accreditation of these restoration and wetland types will require updates to existing blue carbon crediting methodologies, or additional methodologies (and/or standards) but is technically feasible. This study identified twenty targeted knowledge needs to address data and knowledge gaps to maximize financial viability of blue carbon accreditation of Louisiana's tidal wetlands. Knowledge needs were identified in five categories: legislative and policy, accreditation methodologies and standards, soil carbon flux, methane flux, and lateral carbon flux. Due to the large spatial scale and diversity of tidal wetlands, it is expected that progress in coastal Louisiana has high potential to be generalized to similar wetland ecosystems across the northern Gulf of Mexico and globally.

    Keywords: Blue carbon, Tidal marsh, mitigation, adaptation, Louisiana, Carbon credits, offsets, restoration

    Received: 23 Apr 2024; Accepted: 30 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Carruthers, Jones, Terrell, Scheibly, Player, Black, Ehrenwerth, Biber, Connolly, Crooks, Curole, Darnell, Dausman, DeJong, Doyle, Esposito, Friess, Fourqurean, Georgiou, Grimsditch, He, Hillman, Holm, Howard, Jung, Jupiter, Kiskaddon, Krauss, Lavery, Liu, Lovelock, Mack, Macreadie, McGlathery, Megonigal, Roberts, Settelmyer, Staver, Stevens, Sutton-Grier, Villa, White and Waycott. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Tim J. Carruthers, The Water Institute of the Gulf, Baton Rouge, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.