Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Environ. Sci.
Sec. Biogeochemical Dynamics
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1416018
This article is part of the Research Topic Nitrate from Field to Stream: Characterization and Mitigation View all 4 articles

Quantifying the impact of a constructed wetland on downstream nitrate concentrations

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 The University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
  • 2 Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, Missouri, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Constructed wetlands are standard conservation practices used to reduce nitrate loads in agricultural watersheds. Many studies have examined the efficiency of denitrification in wetlands under various scenarios, but quantifying the watershed-scale impact of wetlands on downstream nitrate levels is rarely done using field observations. In this study, we estimated nitrate removal in a constructed wetland in the headwaters of Mud Creek, a HUC12 watershed in eastern Iowa, from May -Sep 2022 and May -Sep 2023 (a ten-month period). We also measured nitrate loads at four successive downstream sites, three along Mud Creek and one below its confluence with the larger Cedar River. The wetland removed 6,200 kg of nitrate (74% of total inputs). At the three downstream locations in Mud Creek, the percentage of each site's total nitrate load removed by the wetland decreased to 19, 8.6, and 4.1%-this latter value represents the wetland's influence on nitrate removal in the entire Mud Creek basin. The wetland's impact of nitrate loads in the Cedar River was negligible (reduction of 0.02%). The percentage of a site's drainage area treated by the wetland approximately followed a 1:1 relationship to that site's percent reduction in nitrate. Profiles of nitrate concentrations in Mud Creek notably varied preand post-wetland. Concentrations before the installation steadily decreased along the waterway, while post-wetland concentrations rapidly decreased directly downstream of the wetland and steadily increased at each succeeding site. Our results demonstrate that while the wetland successfully lowered local nitrate levels, its effect on the basin's overall nitrate loads was minimal. Achieving nutrient reduction goals at the watershed scale solely using constructed wetlands appears infeasible given that the required number of practices greatly exceeds current efforts.

    Keywords: nitrate, wetland, Scaling, remediation, Monitoring, Eutrophication

    Received: 11 Apr 2024; Accepted: 07 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Anderson, Schilling, Craig-Just@uiowa.edu and Seo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Keith Schilling, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.