Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Environ. Sci.
Sec. Freshwater Science
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1389122

What do stakeholders perceive as success in large scale Environmental Monitoring design?

Provisionally accepted
  • The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The decline in global freshwater biodiversity demands urgent action. Governments are attempting to use environmental management to partly restore degraded ecosystems through targeted interventions. Designing monitoring programs to assess the success of these large-scale management programs is challenging. There is much literature addressing the technical challenges of monitoring program design, and many of these studies acknowledge limitations in current implementation. In this study, we examine the perspectives of those managers and scientists involved in designing a large-scale monitoring program and their understanding of what makes a monitoring program successful. We focus on an environmental flow monitoring program (the Flow Monitoring, Evaluation and Research program -Flow-MERin Australia). Through semi-structured interviews and surveys, we aimed to identify what those involved consider to be 'success' for monitoring projects. The outcomes highlight thatconsistent with literatureclear objectives are considered pivotal to project success. However, despite this recognition, challenges in establishing clear objectives were identified as a pressing concern for the Flow-MER program. The survey results included a recurring emphasis from participants on the importance of consistent, long-term datasets. There was less clarity around how to balance monitoring design to both demonstrate management success and address key scientific uncertainties as part of adaptive management and monitoring. The findings show that while there is broadly a common understanding of success for large monitoring design, major monitoring programs such as Flow-MER continue to fall short in successful design. The approach to surveying those involved in the monitoring program, along with their articulated understanding of program shortfalls, both provide insights on how to improve design and implementation of future large-scale monitoring programs. In particular, we highlight the need for managers to establish clear objectives and invest in effective communication strategies.

    Keywords: Environmental flows, Environmental Management, interview, Monitoring design, success criteria, Survey

    Received: 21 Feb 2024; Accepted: 23 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Dai, Webb and Horne. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Xiaoyan Dai, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.