Skip to main content

HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY article

Front. Environ. Sci.
Sec. Water and Wastewater Management
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1331092
This article is part of the Research Topic Energy, Economy, and Climate Interactions: Challenges and Opportunities - Volume II View all 13 articles

Efficiency improvement of wastewater treatment plants under the background of 'double carbon': A case study in the Jiujiang City, China

Provisionally accepted
Tao Rufa Tao Rufa 1,2Huang Yuling Huang Yuling 1*Hui Erqing Hui Erqing 3,4Luo Huihuang Luo Huihuang 1Wang Dianchang Wang Dianchang 3,4Lv Pingyu Lv Pingyu 2,5
  • 1 China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing, China
  • 2 School of River and Ocean Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing, China
  • 3 China Three Gorges Corporation, Wuhan, China
  • 4 Yangtze Ecology and Environment Corporation Limited, Wuhan, China
  • 5 Independent researcher, Chongqing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) play a crucial role in modern urban water environmental protection. However, they face challenges related to high operational costs and carbon emissions. This study focused on addressing these issues through an analysis of four urban WWTPs in Jiujiang City, China. The study involved comparing the size and processes of the plants, evaluating influent and effluent water quality, assessing energy consumption and chemical usage, and calculating both direct and indirect carbon emissions. The results demonstrated that the high operational costs and increased carbon emissions in these WWTPs were primarily attributed to low hydraulic loadings, low influent concentration, and high energy and chemical consumption. In response, three targeted scenarios were proposed to enhance the efficiency of the WWTPs and reduce carbon emissions. These scenarios involved adjusting the amount of wastewater imported into the WWTPs to meet the designed capacity, optimizing operating costs, or combining both approaches. Among the scenarios, Scenario 3 emerged as the most effective in terms of improving efficiency and reducing carbon emissions. The operational costs for WWTPs could be reduced in the range of 0.42 to 1.04 RMB/m 3 , representing a reduction rate of 35% to 57%. Additionally, carbon emissions could be lowered from 15.02 to 598.85 gCO2e/m 3 , corresponding to a reduction of 2.91% to 41.38%.While Scenario 2 exhibited a lower carbon emission reduction of 14.8 to 316.33 gCO2e/m 3 , it was identified as the most feasible and easily implementable high-efficiency solution at present, with a reduction in operational costs ranging from 0.43 to 1.31 RMB/m 3 .To achieve zero-energy consumption and zero carbon emissions in wastewater treatment in the future, it is recommended to undertake additional measures, including enhancing dosing system accuracy, implementing tail gas collection, adopting photovoltaic power generation, implementing carbon sequestration techniques, and exploring wastewater heat source recycling. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing the operational efficiency of urban WWTPs, reducing carbon emissions, and promoting sustainable wastewater treatment practices in Jiujiang City, China.

    Keywords: Wastewater treatment plant, Efficiency improvement, Carbon reduction, Influent concentration, carbon emissions, Operating cost

    Received: 02 Nov 2023; Accepted: 07 May 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Rufa, Yuling, Erqing, Huihuang, Dianchang and Pingyu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Huang Yuling, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.