Towhid Babazadeh1
Soheila Ranjbaran1Kamiar Kouzekanani2Sanaz Abedi Nerbin3
Haleh Heizomi4
Mohammad Ebrahim Ramazani5*- 1Department of Public Health, Sarab Faculty of Medical Science, Sarab, Iran
- 2College of Education and Human Development, Texas, TX, United States
- 3Department of Environmental Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
- 4Department of Health Education and Promotion, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
- 5Islamic Azad University, Tabriz branch, Tabriz, Iran
Background: Identifying factors that may influence waste separation behavior can lead to more effective waste separation, better recycling plans in a community, and more effective and efficient waste management interventions. The purpose of the survey was to identify the key factors behind such behavior.
Methods: The scientific inquiry was cross-sectional in nature, took place in Tabriz, Iran, and employed multistage random sampling to recruit the study’s 360 participants. The data collection process took place between September 2018 and February 2019. A Theory of Planned Behavior-driven questionnaire was developed by the research team for the purpose of data collection. The structural equation modeling (SEM) approach was deployed for data analysis.
Results: The structural equation modeling of the data showed the most important determinants of behavioral intention were perceived behavioral control (β = 0.39, p < 0.05), moral commitments (β = 0.19, p < 0.05), and perceived policy effectiveness (β = 0.12, p < 0.05). The strongest determinants of waste separation behavior were behavioral intention (β = 0.29, p < 0.05) and perceived behavioral control (β = 0.25, p < 0.05). In addition, age-group and gender differences were statistically related to waste separation behavior significantly (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Recycling investors and other stakeholders should focus on perceived behavioral control and intention in designing and implementing waste separation programs.
Introduction
Population growth and industrial development are major factors for producing huge amounts of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW), especially in developing countries, which have fast population increase and urbanization (Akhtar et al., 2017; Babazadeh et al., 2018a). In many developing countries, in addition to the fast population growing, numerous problems such as lack of cooperation between organizations, Insufficient financial resources, and lack of technical skills in municipal authorities has caused the poor management of MSW (Babazadeh et al., 2018b).
Solid waste that is not properly collected and disposed can be a breeding ground for insects, vermin, and scavenging animals that may result in air- and water-borne diseases (Hoornweg and Bhada-Tata, 2012). For example, surveys conducted by UN-Habitat show that in areas where waste is not collected frequently, the incidence of diarrhea is twice as high and acute respiratory infections six times higher than in areas where collection is frequent (UN-HABITAT, 2010). Additionally, poorly managed waste has negative impacts on fragile terrestrial, coastal and marine ecosystems, tourism (Hoornweg and Bhada-Tata, 2012) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Chen and Lo, 2016). Post-consumer waste is estimated to account for nearly 5% of total GHG emissions (Wilson et al., 2015).
The proper management of MSW in developed countries (e.g., United States, Germany, Japan) has been due to a move from a landfill-based waste management system to a more integrated one, which is considered to be the key towards a successful treatment of MSW (Zhuang et al., 2008; Memon, 2010). Waste separation is a critical component of a successful integrated waste management system (Adeniran et al., 2017), because it increases the quality of the produced compost and recyclables, and optimizes incineration. Additionally, it enables better financing of waste management activities and minimizes the energy and labor inputs to any downstream processes (Zhuang et al., 2008) and also, it can be used in the tire industry (Fathollahi-Fard et al., 2021), lighting industry (Mirzagoltabar et al., 2021), and walnut industry (Salehi-Amiri et al., 2021) by closed-loop supply chain network. The closed-loop supply chains efficiency is improved by pricing and advertising decisions, strict environmental and social legislations (Asghari et al., 2022) and especially, is affected by during the COVID-19 pandemic (Moosavi et al., 2022).
Previous studies suggest that several factors, namely, pro-environmental attitude, opportunity cost, recycling knowledge, and social norms may be effective in recycling/source separation activities (Matsumoto, 2014; Arkorful et al., 2022), subjective norms, moral norms, convenience, and the cost to recycle (Juliana et al., 2022), financial incentives and frequency of waste collection (Grodzińska-Jurczak et al., 2006; Castagna et al., 2013). The results of the study demonstrated that attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control affected the intention of millennial consumers to decrease the use of plastic drinking bottles (Raimondo et al., 2022). An Italian study concluded that waste management process is optimized when both citizens and local government behave appropriately (Agovino et al., 2018). Some reports suggest that effective policies in the field of waste management are instrumental in positively affecting household recycling behaviors (Lee and Jung, 2017; Morlok et al., 2017; Andersson and Stage, 2018). For example, it is reported that collecting food waste separately is more effective than imposing weight-based tariffs to reduce the waste destined for incineration (Andersson and Stage, 2018).
Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) is a frequently used framework for determining behaviors. The TPB was presented by Fishbein and Ajzen (1980) and has been extensively utilized in the prediction of health-related behaviors and the design of behavior change interventions (Taghdisi et al., 2016; Babazadeh et al., 2017). In the study conducted in Italy in 2022, the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) was successful in predicting behavior regarding reduced plastic drinking bottle consumption (Raimondo et al., 2022). In the study by Wang et al. (2021), environmental regulation played the most important role on behavioral intention for household waste sorting and behavior affected by intention and perceived behavior control for household waste sorting. A study conducted in Thailand revealed knowledge and subjective norm were two important determinants of the respondents’ intention that had a strong influence on household waste separation behavior (Pongpunpurt et al., 2022). A study by Bardus and Massoud (2022) showed perceived behavioral control, perceived norms, and current behavior were the strongest predictors of intention toward separating waste. The research of the study conducted utilizing TPB in Shanghai (2022) demonstrated that attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control were significantly associated with residents’ waste sorting intention and proved sorting behavior was affected by sorting intention (Govindan et al., 2022). The results of another study revealed subjective norms and environmental attitudes were significantly associated with pro-environmental intention. Also, pro-environmental intention and perceived behavioral control were related to pro-environmental behaviors (Karimi et al., 2022). Hence, the study outcomes can help policymakers and stockholders in terms of formulating laws and regulations to enhance waste separation behavior and recycling plans in a community.
Despite its success in investigating the determinants of various kinds of behavior, the conventional TPB framework was argued to be necessary for the more explaining complex behavior, such as solid waste source separation, and that additional variables should be incorporated (Ajzen, 1991; Davies et al., 2002). Consequently, in our study, we added moral obligation and effectiveness to the model. The perceived moral commitment is defined as an individual’s judgment of moral correctness of performing a specific behavior and was included in the TPB to improve predictive validity (Ajzen, 1991) and explain waste separation behaviors (Pakpour et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2017). The purpose of the study was to examine the determinants of Source Separation of Waste (SSW), utilizing the modified TPB model.
Methods
Setting
The study was conducted in Tabriz (capital of East Azerbaijan Province, Iran). The temperature typically ranges from 6.8 to 15.7°C, annual precipitation is approximately 250–300 mm, and the population, as of 2016, was 1,773,033 (Cencus, 2016). 1,200 tonnes of garbage per person are produced in Tabriz, Iran, according to a study by Zazouli et al. (2012). The most common constituents of this waste are organic materials (58.5%) and recyclable materials (including paper, plastic, metals, and glass) (26.2%). They came to the conclusion that around 85% of Tabriz’s waste can be recycled, which could significantly lower environmental pollution (Zazouli et al., 2012).
Study design and data collection
This cross-sectional study was conducted between September 2018 and February 2019. Multistage random sampling was employed to recruit the study’s participants, who had to be at least 15 years old. Specifically, in each of Tabriz’s 10 municipalities, two health centers were randomly selected. The 20 health centers’ records were used to randomly select individuals. The sample size based on the study of Babaei et al. (2015), and using G*Power software, p = 0.24, d = 0.05, and z = 1.96, β = 0.8, was estimated 390 people. All of the participants were invited to the study, of which 360 accepted the invitation (response rate = 92.30%), were informed of the purpose of the study, and signed informed consent forms. Face-to-face interviews by three trained interviewers were conducted to collect the data, each lasting approximately 20 min.
Instrumentation
A TPB-driven questionnaire was developed by the research team for the purpose of data collection, utilizing previously published instruments (Xu et al., 2017; Ma et al., 2018). A panel of experts (12 health educators, 4 environmentalists, and 2 waste management authorities) examined the content validity of the questionnaire and their feedback was used to finalize it, which was then pilot-tested by 30 residents of Tabriz to assess its utility and reliability. A brief description of the questionnaire is as follows:
A) Socio-demographic Variables: Data on age, gender, marital status, education, income, and occupational status were collected to describe the sample
B) TPB Measures: The TPB constructs were displayed in Table 1.
TABLE 1. Details of the employed TPB questionnaire.
C) Waste separation behavior, the outcome measure, was assessed by obtaining data on how often nine various wastes (i.e., paper, glass, kitchen waste, battery, discarded plastic bottles, cans, metal objects, renewable plastics, and cloths) were separated during the previous 12 months. The responses were coded as 1 = never, 2 = seldom, 3 = occasionally, 4 = regularly, and 5 = always. Cronbach’s Alpha for this scale was 0.90.
The sum of the responses to the items in each construct was used to compute the scale score. Higher the score, higher the behavior.
Data analysis
Descriptive statistics were employed to summarize the data. Median was used for the purpose of missing data imputation. To determine the relationship between attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, perceived moral obligation with intention and waste separation Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was conducted, utilizing maximum-likelihood estimates (Sodani et al., 2012). All attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and perceived moral obligation variables with intention and waste separation were combined into a single SEM. An acceptable fit was confirmed if root mean square errors of approximation (RMSEA) < 0.08; comparative fit index (CFI) and standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) < 0.05 (Ciftci et al., 2006; Powers et al., 2008). The Stata/SE, version 12.0, software was used for the purpose of data analysis (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, United States). The level of significance was set, a priori, at 0.05.
Ethical considerations
The study received ethical approval from the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Ethics Committee (Ethical Code/Number, IR. TBZMED.REC. 1,395.864).
Results
The majority of the 360 participants were less than 29 years old (56.60%), male (55.80%), self-employed (61.40%), and bachelor’s degree was the mode for their highest level of education (46.40%). Age-group and gender differences based on the outcome measure of waste separation behavior were statistically significant (See Table 2).
TABLE 2. Means and standard deviations by selected demographic characteristics for waste separation behavior.
A series of Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient was performed. As can be seen in Table 3, all bivariate associations among the TPB variables as well as the associations between them and the outcome measure of waste separation behavior were statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
TABLE 3. Correlation matrix for all study variables.
The results of the structural model and fit indices, X2 = 3.18, df = 2, X2/df = 1.59, N = 360, RMSEA = 0.00, CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.96, SRMR = 0.01, RSMEA = 0.04, CI: 0.00 to 0.12, showed a satisfactory fit. The most important determinants of behavioral intention were perceived behavioral control (β = 0.39, p < 0.05), moral commitments (β = 0.19, p < 0.05), and perceived policy effectiveness (β = 0.12, p < 0.05), suggesting that behavioral intention is increased by higher perceived behavioral control, moral commitments, and perceived policy effectiveness. The most powerful determinants of waste separation behavior were behavioral intention (β = 0.29, p < 0.05) and perceived behavioral control (β = 0.25, p < 0.05); that is, the outcome is increased by behavioral intention and perceived behavioral control. The model is depicted in Figure 1.
FIGURE 1. Cognitive predictors of waste separation behavior.
Discussion
The results of this study showed that behavioral intention has been most important in the predicting of waste separation behavior. Xu et al. (2017), in their Chinese study, also found strong intention was associated with this behavior. In other studies, Wang et al. (2021) in China, found behavior affected by intention and perceived behavior control for household waste sorting and Pongpunpurt et al. (2022) in Thailand, revealed knowledge and subjective norm were two important determinants of the respondents’ intention that had a strong influence on household waste separation behavior. In another study, Zhang et al. (2015) in China indicated that waste separation behavioral intentions had a significant positive influence on waste separation behavior. These findings indicate that increased intention of waste separation behavior can significantly improve the behavior. In this study, it was found that perceived behavioral control was the strongest determinant of behavioral intention, positively affecting the outcome, which is consistent with previous studies (Arı and Yılmaz, 2016; Wan et al., 2017; Bardus and Massoud, 2022; Govindan et al., 2022). The findings reflect that residents’ behavioral intentions were largely dependent on their self-control abilities. Furthermore, subjective norms were not associated with the intention of waste separation at source, which was in line with the results of study conducted by Agovino et al. (2018), although opposite conclusions were also obtained on recycling behaviors in Hong Kong (Wan et al., 2014a), in Italy (Raimondo et al., 2022) and Iran (Pakpour et al., 2014). This may be because waste source-separated collection has not been sufficiently established in Tabriz to provide strong norms so that the respondents did not think they were under significant social pressure for their waste separation behaviors.
Ajzen (1991) had suggested the addition of moral obligations or norms to the TPB model to improve its predictive validity, which we did and found it to be an important determinant of individuals’ separation intention. This finding is consistent with previous studies (Zhang et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2017), suggesting that strategies aimed at emphasizing individuals’ moral motivations are important in promoting household waste separation behaviors. Cultivating residents’ responsibility to protect the environment and promote traditional virtues have the potential to be effective.
Similar to our findings, another study also showed perceived environmental policies could be useful in promoting source separation behaviors (Steg and Vlek, 2009). Wan et al. (2014b) suggested a framework that combined the TPB and the Norm Activation Model (NAM) to determine recycling behaviors, utilizing policy effectiveness as a moderating factor, which had a negative role between subject norm and recycling intention. We also found no relation between perceived policy effectiveness and waste separation behaviors; however, it was correlated with the moderating factor of intention.
To better understand the results, we examined the waste separation behavior in relation to a few selected demographic variables and found differences due to age and gender. Specifically, older people in our study were more likely to take part in waste separation, which is also supported by Pakpour et al. (2014) in Iran and Pearson et al. (2012) in Texas, because they may have the free time to tend to the task or committed to conserve resources for future generations. Similar to another study (Davies et al., 2002), the prevalence of the behavior among women in our study was were more compared to men, suggesting that specific educational materials should be developed to encourage them to actively participate in household waste separation activities.
Conclusion
We investigated factors that may influence Tabriz residents’ source separation intention and behaviors for improving recycling system by extending the Theory of Planned Behavior to include perceived moral obligation and effectiveness policies. We found urban residents’ source separation intentions were positively influenced by higher perceived behavioral control, moral commitments, and perceived policies effectiveness, while constructs of intention and perceived behavioral control were useful in predicting waste separation behaviors. These findings show needs of the future research that effective policies and strategies should be developed and implemented to encourage concerned individuals to actively participate in waste separation by promoting environmental awareness messaging, informing them of moral obligations, and focusing on creating a sense of responsibility for environmental protection. There were some limitations in this study. First, as data collection method in the present study was based on self-report by citizens, recall bias is warranted. The second limitation is that the generalizability of the findings is limited to Tabriz city. As well as, as a limitation for the present study, we only used one method for data collection. This means that no other complementary method was used to confirm the findings. Having a mixed approach to triangulate the quantitative findings with qualitative ones may have provided us with a high level of internal validity. Using different methods in data collection could help the team of research in checking the reliability and validity of the data.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Ethics Committee in Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
MR and TB: designing the study, conducting the study, administrative support, drafting, and revising the manuscript. KK contributed to the review and revised the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted. SA contributed to the study concept and design, interpretation of the data. SR: designing the study, conducting the study, administrative support, drafting and revising the manuscript. HH contributed to the study concept and design, review and revised the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Adeniran, A., Nubi, A., and Adelopo, A. (2017). Solid waste generation and characterization in the University of Lagos for a sustainable waste management. Waste Manag. 67, 3–10. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.002
Agovino, M., D'Uva, M., Garofalo, A., and Marchesano, K. (2018). Waste management performance in Italian provinces: Efficiency and spatial effects of local governments and citizen action. Ecol. Indic. 89, 680–695. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.045
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50 (2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t
Akhtar, S., Ahmad, A., Qureshi, M., and Shahraz, S. (2017). Households willingness to pay for improved solid waste management. Glob. J. Environ. Sci. Manag. 3 (2), 143–152. doi:10.22034/gjesm.2017.03.02.003
Andersson, C., and Stage, J. (2018). Direct and indirect effects of waste management policies on household waste behaviour: The case of Sweden. Waste Manag. 76, 19–27. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.038
Arı, E., and Yılmaz, V. (2016). A proposed structural model for housewives' recycling behavior: A case study from Turkey. Ecol. Econ. 129, 132–142. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.002
Arkorful, V. E., Shuliang, Z., and Lugu, B. K. (2022). Investigating household waste separation behavior: The salience of an integrated norm activation model and the theory of planned behavior. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 27, 1. doi:10.1080/09640568.2022.2063112
Asghari, M., Afshari, H., Mirzapour Al-e-hashem, S., Fathollahi-Fard, A. M., and Dulebenets, M. A. (2022). Pricing and advertising decisions in a direct-sales closed-loop supply chain. Comput. Industrial Eng. 171, 108439. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2022.108439
Babaei, A. A., Alavi, N., Goudarzi, G., Teymouri, P., Ahmadi, K., and Rafiee, M. (2015). Household recycling knowledge, attitudes and practices towards solid waste management. Resour. Conservation Recycl. 102, 94–100. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.06.014
Babazadeh, T., Nadrian, H., Banayejeddi, M., and Rezapour, B. (2017). Determinants of skin cancer preventive behaviors among rural farmers in Iran: An application of protection motivation theory. J. Cancer Educ. 32 (3), 604–612. doi:10.1007/s13187-016-1004-7
Babazadeh, T., Nadrian, H., Mosaferi, M., and Allahverdipour, H. (2018). Challenges in household solid waste separation plan (HSWSP) at source: A qualitative study in Iran. Envr. Dev. Sustain. 22, 1–16. doi:10.1007/s10668-018-0225-9
Babazadeh, T., Nadrian, H., Mosaferi, M., and Allahverdipour, H. (2018). Identifying challenges and barriers to participating in the source separation of waste program in Tabriz, northwest of Iran: A qualitative study from the citizens’ perspective. Resources 7 (3), 53. doi:10.3390/resources7030053
Bardus, M., and Massoud, M. A. (2022). Predicting the intention to sort waste at home in rural communities in Lebanon: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Int. J. Environ. Res. public health 19 (15), 9383. doi:10.3390/ijerph19159383
Castagna, A., Casagranda, M., Zeni, A., Girelli, E., Rada, E. C., Ragazzi, M., et al. (2013). 3R’S from citizens point of view and their proposal from a case-study. UPB Sci. Bull. 75, 253–264.
Cencus (2016). General census of population and housing: 2016 cencus. Available at: http://www.mpo-es.ir/Dorsapax/userfiles/Sub1/g_sarshomari95.pdf.
Chen, Y-C., and Lo, S-L. (2016). Evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions for several municipal solid waste management strategies. J. Clean. Prod. 113, 606–612. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.058
Ciftci, I. H., Karaca, S., Dogru, O., Cetinkaya, Z., and Kulac, M. (2006). Prevalence of pediculosis and scabies in preschool nursery children of Afyon, Turkey. Korean J. Parasitol. 44 (1), 95–98. doi:10.3347/kjp.2006.44.1.95
Davies, J., Foxall, G. R., and Pallister, J. (2002). Beyond the intention–behaviour mythology: An integrated model of recycling. Mark. theory 2 (1), 29–113. doi:10.1177/1470593102002001645
Fathollahi-Fard, A. M., Dulebenets, M. A., Hajiaghaei–Keshteli, M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Safaeian, M., and Mirzahosseinian, H. (2021). Two hybrid meta-heuristic algorithms for a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain network design problem in the tire industry under uncertainty. Adv. Eng. Inf. 50, 101418. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2021.101418
Govindan, K., Zhuang, Y., and Chen, G. (2022). Analysis of factors influencing residents' waste sorting behavior: A case study of Shanghai. J. Clean. Prod. 349, 131126. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131126
Grodzińska-Jurczak, M., Tomal, P., Tarabuła-Fiertak, M., Nieszporek, K., and Read, A. (2006). Effects of an educational campaign on public environmental attitudes and behaviour in Poland. Resour. Conservation Recycl. 46 (2), 182–197. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.06.010
Hoornweg, D., and Bhada-Tata, P. (2012). What a waste: A global review of solid waste management. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Juliana, N., Lada, S., and Chekima, B. (2022). Exploring determinants shaping recycling behavior using an extended theory of planned behavior model: An empirical study of households in sabah, Malaysia. Sustainability 14 (8), 4628. doi:10.3390/su14084628
Karimi, S., Liobikienė, G., and Alitavakoli, F. (2022). The effect of religiosity on pro-environmental behavior based on the theory of planned behavior: A cross-sectional study among Iranian rural female facilitators. Front. Psychol. 13, 745019. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.745019
Lee, S., and Jung, K. (2017). Exploring effective incentive design to reduce food waste: A natural experiment of policy change from community based charge to rfid based weight charge. Sustainability 9 (11), 2046. doi:10.3390/su9112046
Ma, J., Hipel, K. W., Hanson, M. L., Cai, X., and Liu, Y. (2018). An analysis of influencing factors on municipal solid waste source-separated collection behavior in Guilin, China by Using the Theory of Planned Behavior. Sustain. cities Soc. 37, 336–343. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2017.11.037
Matsumoto, S. (2014). The opportunity cost of pro-environmental activities: Spending time to promote the environment. J. Fam. Econ. Issues 35 (1), 119–130. doi:10.1007/s10834-013-9354-3
Memon, M. A. (2010). Integrated solid waste management based on the 3R approach. J. Material Cycles Waste Manag. 12 (1), 30–40. doi:10.1007/s10163-009-0274-0
Mirzagoltabar, H., Shirazi, B., Mahdavi, I., and Khamseh, A. A. (2021). Sustainable dual-channel closed-loop supply chain network with new products for the lighting industry. Comput. Industrial Eng. 162, 107781. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2021.107781
Moosavi, J., Fathollahi-Fard, A. M., and Dulebenets, M. A. (2022). Supply chain disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic: Recognizing potential disruption management strategies. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 75, 102983. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102983
Morlok, J., Schoenberger, H., Styles, D., Galvez-Martos, J-L., and Zeschmar-Lahl, B. (2017). The impact of pay-as-you-throw schemes on municipal solid waste management: The exemplar case of the county of aschaffenburg, Germany. Ger. Resour. 6 (1), 8. doi:10.3390/resources6010008
Pakpour, A. H., Zeidi, I. M., Emamjomeh, M. M., Asefzadeh, S., and Pearson, H. (2014). Household waste behaviours among a community sample in Iran: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Waste Manag. 34 (6), 980–986. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.028
Pearson, H. C., Dawson, L. N., and Breitkopf, C. R. (2012). Recycling attitudes and behavior among a clinic-based sample of low-income Hispanic women in southeast Texas. PloS one 7 (4), e34469. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034469
Pongpunpurt, P., Muensitthiroj, P., Pinitjitsamut, P., Chuenchum, P., Painmanakul, P., Chawaloesphonsiya, N., et al. (2022). Studying waste separation behaviors and environmental impacts toward sustainable solid waste management: A case study of bang chalong housing, samut prakan, Thailand. Thail. Sustain. 14 (9), 5040. doi:10.3390/su14095040
Powers, B. J., Olsen, M. K., Oddone, E. Z., Thorpe, C. T., and Bosworth, H. B. (2008). Literacy and blood pressure–do healthcare systems influence this relationship? A cross-sectional study. BMC health Serv. Res. 8 (1), 219–9. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-219
Raimondo, M., Hamam, M., D'Amico, M., and Caracciolo, F. (2022). Plastic-free behavior of millennials: An application of the theory of planned behavior on drinking choices. Waste Manag. 138, 253–261. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2021.12.004
Salehi-Amiri, A., Zahedi, A., Akbapour, N., and Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M. (2021). Designing a sustainable closed-loop supply chain network for walnut industry. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 141, 110821. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110821
Sodani, M., Shogaeyan, M., and Neysi, A. (2012). The effect of group logo-therapy on loneliness in retired men. Res. Cognitive Behav. Sci. 2 (1), 43–54.
Steg, L., and Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. J. Environ. Psychol. 29 (3), 309–317. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
Taghdisi, M. H., Babazadeh, T., Moradi, F., and Shariat, F. (2016). Effect of educational intervention on the fruit and vegetables consumption among the students: Applying theory of planned behavior. J. Res. health Sci. 16 (4), 195–199.
UN-HABITAT (2010). Solid waste management in the world's cities: UN-HABITAT. London & Washingtone, DC: Earthscan.
Wan, C., Shen, G. Q., and Choi, S. (2017). Experiential and instrumental attitudes: Interaction effect of attitude and subjective norm on recycling intention. J. Environ. Psychol. 50, 69–79. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.02.006
Wan, C., Shen, G. Q., and Yu, A. (2014). The moderating effect of perceived policy effectiveness on recycling intention. J. Environ. Psychol. 37, 55–60. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.006
Wan, C., Shen, G. Q., and Yu, A. (2014). The role of perceived effectiveness of policy measures in predicting recycling behaviour in Hong Kong. Conservation Recycl. 83, 141–151. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.12.009
Wang, Y., Long, X., Li, L., Wang, Q., Ding, X., and Cai, S. (2021). Extending theory of planned behavior in household waste sorting in China: The moderating effect of knowledge, personal involvement, and moral responsibility. Dev. Sustain. 23 (5), 7230–7250. doi:10.1007/s10668-020-00913-9
Wilson, D. C., Rodic, L., Modak, P., Soos, R., Carpintero, A., Velis, K., et al. (2015). Global waste management outlook: UnepNEP. Avaliable At: https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/9672.
Xu, L., Ling, M., Lu, Y., and Shen, M. (2017). Understanding household waste separation behaviour: Testing the roles of moral, past experience, and perceived policy effectiveness within the Theory of Planned behaviour. Sustainability 9 (4), 625. doi:10.3390/su9040625
Zazouli, M. A., Belarak, D., Mahdavi, Y., and Barafrashtehpour, M. (2012). A quantitative and qualitative investigation of Tabriz solid waste. J. Mazandaran Univ. Med. Sci. 21 (2), 86–90.
Zhang, D., Huang, G., Yin, X., and Gong, Q. (2015). Residents’ waste separation behaviors at the source: Using SEM with the theory of planned behavior in Guangzhou, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. public health 12 (8), 9475–9491. doi:10.3390/ijerph120809475
Keywords: theory of planned behavior, waste separation, waste management, recycling, Iran
Citation: Babazadeh T, Ranjbaran S, Kouzekanani K, Abedi Nerbin S, Heizomi H and Ramazani ME (2023) Determinants of waste separation behavior Tabriz, Iran: An application of the theory of planned behavior at health center. Front. Environ. Sci. 11:985095. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.985095
Received: 03 July 2022; Accepted: 22 February 2023;
Published: 10 March 2023.
Edited by:
Steffen Fritz, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), AustriaReviewed by:
Maxim A. Dulebenets, Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, United StatesHafizan Juahir, Sultan Zainal Abidin University, Malaysia
Copyright © 2023 Babazadeh, Ranjbaran, Kouzekanani, Abedi Nerbin, Heizomi and Ramazani. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mohammad Ebrahim Ramazani, ramazani_m_a@yahoo.com