Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Environ. Sci., 19 January 2023
Sec. Environmental Economics and Management
This article is part of the Research Topic Carbon Neutrality Approaches in Buildings and Agriculture Sectors View all 12 articles

Editorial: Carbon neutrality approaches in buildings and agriculture sectors

  • 1College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
  • 2School of Public Administration and Policy, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan, China
  • 3School of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • 4School of Public Policy and Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China

Climate change is a critical global challenge. Carbon neutrality has become a grand and imperative goal to cope with this challenge (Chen et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2022). In the context of carbon neutrality, green policy, green innovation, green behaviors, and green industrial transformation have triggered increasing research interests (Si et al., 2020; 2022; Zhao et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2021; 2023). It is noteworthy that the building sector consumes more than 40% of global energy and accounts for approximately 40% of global greenhouse gas emissions (He et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2021). The building sector is under particularly high pressures to transform its development paths (Zhang et al., 2022). Therefore, this Research Topic is launched to produce a comprehensive reflection of research on carbon neutrality, especially the research related to the transformation of the building sector. The guest editors aim to highlight avenues for new research by capturing the current state-of-the-art in carbon neutrality research and practice and supporting the foundation for future work. This Research Topic welcomed carbon neutralization studies in the field of economics and management and embraces diverse research methods and article types, including systematic literature review, conceptual framework development, analytical and simulation modeling, quantitative and qualitative empirical studies, and other rigorous research. Twelve papers, including this editorial, were finally included in this Research Topic. In the next section, we briefly describe the contributions of these papers.

The paper can be divided into three levels, including the micro-behavioral level, the meso-industry level (especially in the building sector), and the macro-development level. First, there are three papers rooted in the micro-behavioral level. Wen and Qiang developed a Bayesian network model to address the complexity of stakeholder concerns and optimize the decision-making process in green building projects from the perspective of social sustainability. The feasibility of the Bayesian network model was verified by the case of the Wuhan International Commerce Center. This study facilitates a better accommodation of social sustainability in the decision-making process for green buildings. Liu conducted face-to-face surveys in North China and revealed conflicting perceptions of different stakeholders on the pathways to improve air quality. This study helps to better balance the concerns of different stakeholders in the process of developing air quality improvement policies. Ao et al. conducted a questionnaire survey in areas affected by the natural disaster (i.e., Wenchuan earthquake) to investigate the status of post-disaster reconstruction and the level of satisfaction of residents in these areas. This study contributes to enriching research on residents’ satisfaction as well as reconstruction practices after natural disasters.

Second, there are five papers rooted in the meso-industry level. Guo and Li developed a “mi” shaped conceptual framework for the collaborative development of intelligent construction and building industrialization. This framework, which includes the four dimensions of the driving force, resource supply, collaborative operation, and trust guarantee, contributes to clarifying the development directions of intelligent construction and building industrialization. Tang et al. provided a bibliometric analysis of 296 papers on government behaviors in carbon emissions and developed a framework for aligning carbon emissions policies in the building sector. This study revealed the transmission path of government behaviors toward carbon emissions in the building sector and shed light on potential directions for future research. Xia et al. developed an evaluation index system that considers the stability of the tunnel construction process and the level of carbon emission and proposed an intelligent decision method to better assess the utility of excavation schemes. The decision indicator system and method can be applied to the selection of the excavation scheme in engineering projects. Lu and Juan conducted questionnaire surveys to analyze the differences between developers’ and users’ perceptions of green building technologies and developed an optimal decision-making model taking into account developers’ incremental cost and benefit assessment to assist in selecting green building technologies. Li and Lu introduced the green credit guidelines as a quasi-natural experiment and applied PSM-DID to examine the effects of green credit policy on the performance of construction energy-saving firms, with consideration of the mediating role of firms’ debt. This study revealed the nuanced effects of green credit policy and provided implications for facilitating the development of energy-saving firms in the context of carbon neutrality.

Third, there are three papers rooted in the macro-development level. Xie selected Chinese-listed firms from the Rankins index between 2009 and 2017 as the sample and examined the effect of corporate social performance on green technology, with consideration of the moderating role of slack resources. This study provided implications for promoting green technology innovations. Khurshid et al. examined the effect of climate change shocks on economic growth using non-linear analysis. This study revealed the asymmetrical effects of CO2 emissions and mean temperature on economic growth both in the long run and short run and provided macro-level policy suggestions for mitigating climate change. Wang et al. analyzed China’s policies related to carbon neutrality and provided suggestions for aligning the carbon policy system.

In summary, the contributed papers focus on topics related to carbon neutrality, climate change, and sustainable development at three levels, including the micro-behavioral level, the meso-industry level, and the macro-development level. The meso-industry level studies are mainly focused on the building sector. There is a huge potential to explore carbon neutrality in the agriculture sector.

Author contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Numbers: 71901101, 72104128, and 71972018), the Fellowship of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Project Number: 2020M671134), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (Program Number: 2662021JC002).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Chen, X., Liu, Y., and Mcelroy, M. (2022). Transition towards carbon-neutral electrical systems for China: Challenges and perspectives. Front. Eng. Manag. 9 (3), 504–508. doi:10.1007/s42524-022-0220-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He, Q., Wang, Z., Wang, G., Zuo, J., Wu, G., and Liu, B. (2020). To be green or not to be: How environmental regulations shape contractor greenwashing behaviors in construction projects. Sustain. Cities Soc. 63, 102462. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102462

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Si, H., Duan, X., Zhang, W., Su, Y., and Wu, G. (2022). Are you a water saver? Discovering people’s water-saving intention by extending the theory of planned behavior. J. Environ. Manag. 311, 114848. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114848

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Si, H., Shi, J. G., Tang, D., Wu, G., and Lan, J. (2020). Understanding intention and behavior toward sustainable usage of bike sharing by extending the theory of planned behavior. Resour. Conservation Recycl. 152, 104513. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104513

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, G., Li, Y., Zuo, J., Hu, W., Nie, Q., and Lei, H. (2021). Who drives green innovations? Characteristics and policy implications for green building collaborative innovation networks in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 143, 110875. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110875

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, G., Zhang, H., Zeng, S., Meng, X., and Lin, H. (2023). Reporting on sustainable development: Configurational effects of top management team and corporate characteristics on environmental information disclosure. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 30 (1). 28–52. doi:10.1002/csr.2337

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Y., Wang, H., Löschel, A., and Zhou, P. (2022). Energy transition toward carbon-neutrality in China: Pathways, implications and uncertainties. Front. Eng. Manag. 9 (3), 358–372. doi:10.1007/s42524-022-0202-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, H., Xiong, H., Wang, G., and Jiang, P. (2022). Springer Netherlands. (Issue 0123456789. How institutional pressures improve environmental management performance in construction projects: An agent-based simulation approach, Environ. Dev. Sustain., Berlin, Germany. doi:10.1007/s10668-022-02758-w

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, X., Ke, Y., Zuo, J., Xiong, W., and Wu, P. (2020). Evaluation of sustainable transport research in 2000–2019. J. Clean. Prod. 256, 120404. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120404

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: carbon neutralization, industrial transformation, green building, sustainable community, green policy

Citation: Wang G, Si H, Zhao X and Wu G (2023) Editorial: Carbon neutrality approaches in buildings and agriculture sectors. Front. Environ. Sci. 11:1133587. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1133587

Received: 29 December 2022; Accepted: 12 January 2023;
Published: 19 January 2023.

Edited and reviewed by:

Faik Bilgili, Erciyes University, Türkiye

Copyright © 2023 Wang, Si, Zhao and Wu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Guangdong Wu, gd198410@cqu.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.