Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Environ. Sci., 10 March 2022
Sec. Toxicology, Pollution and the Environment
This article is part of the Research Topic Occurrence, Fate, and Treatment of Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in the Environment and Engineered Systems View all 4 articles

Editorial: Occurrence, Fate, and Treatment of Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in the Environment and Engineered Systems

Weilan Zhang
Weilan Zhang1*Hamidreza SharifanHamidreza Sharifan2Xingmao MaXingmao Ma3
  • 1Department of Environmental and Sustainable Engineering, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, United States
  • 2Department of Natural Science, Albany State University, Albany, GA, United States
  • 3Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are fabricated chemicals comprising over 4,700 species. They have been applied in a wide range of products to achieve different purposes for more than 5 decades. PFAS have been extensively formulated in consumer products such as food packaging, paper industry, cosmetics, petroleum products, clothing materials, and aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs). The complex structures of PFAS derive from the diversity in functional groups, interchangeable ionization state, chain length, and degree of branching. Despite their high versatility in physiochemistry, the per/poly-fluoroalkyl moiety generally leads to high thermal stability, great hydrophobicity and oleophobicity. In addition, ionizable and polar headgroups in their structures often result in the properties of surfactants.

PFAS emissions occur unintentionally during fluoropolymer processing, decomposition, and discarding of PFAS-containing products. Transformation through biochemical processes is generally initiated from their labile non-fluorinated groups. The perfluoroalkyl groups are highly resistant to different treatment processes. The current of surface water or groundwater governs their occurrence at the regional scale, while the oceanic and atmospheric transport make them ubiquitous contaminants. PFAS are nowadays commonly found in wastewater influents. However, their removal efficiency in conventional biological and chemical treatment processes including advanced oxidation processes is not sufficient to remove PFAS residuals from the wastewater, resulting in their accumulation in natural water bodies. Recent advances in tracing PFAS using deuterated nitrogen indicated a clear link between release of PFAS and biomagnification in human food as presented in “Kaboré et al.”.

Even though most studies suggest that water is the primary carrier of PFAS, leading to their widespread presence in the environment, recent studies concluded that the atmospheric deposition of PFAS is also an important contamination route of the environment. As documented, the distribution radius of PFAS atmospheric deposition may exceed 45 km from the source of release. However, the maximum PFAS concentration may be found within 20 km of the wind direction from the manufacturing source.

In the early 2000s, the presence of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) in serum of human blood and detection of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) in remote habitats and polar bears raised public concerns about their potential toxicity and environmental impacts. In 2015, the public health concerns ended the production line of long-chain PFAS in several countries and prompted the production of short-chain species instead.

While many studies have reported PFAS accumulation in shallow water bodies and soils, their impacts on fisheries and aquaculture have not been well discussed. For example, bullfrog (Rana catesbiana), an ecosystem health indicator species, is highly prone to bioaccumulation of PFAS. This health threat has been highlighted in “Sun et al.”. The PFAS accumulation in such species and appropriate risk assessment should be a priority in evaluating the impact of PFAS on the nexus of Food-Water-Energy.

While low levels of PFAS are broadly detected in the environment, finding hotspots and source control of PFAS might be a more effective approach to limit their negative effects. However, it still requires sampling from soil or water, which is often costly. Efforts in tracking their source have usually centered around linking specific PFAS components to a particular formulation, using statistical methods (i.e., Principal Component Analysis), or machine learning techniques. However, new tools to be used on-site have high interest as they provide real-time data. Design and development of polar organic chemical integrative samplers (POCIS) in “Hale et al.” have been suggested for PFAS detection in environments due to easy management and cost benefits. POCIS can significantly enhance the control and management of PFAS emissions from multiple point/non-point sources. The time-averaged concentration and low detection limits of POCIS allow characterizing PFAS in water bodies, troposphere, and wastewater.

The published articles are a resourceful collection for scientists and engineers who are interested in understanding the issues of PFAS and in developing environmental strategies and actions to mitigate their effects. Explicitly, the articles included in this Research Topic conclude innovative source tracking, validation, and analysis strategies for PFAS assessments in environmental matrices and living tissues. We believe that this Research Topic highlights the present state of PFAS concerns and showcases innovative directions that expand our understanding of the toxicity, persistence, and fate of PFAS, and horizons for developing strategies to remediate PFAS polluted water and soil.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: PFAS, treatment, occurrence, fate, wastewater

Citation: Zhang W, Sharifan H and Ma X (2022) Editorial: Occurrence, Fate, and Treatment of Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in the Environment and Engineered Systems. Front. Environ. Sci. 10:880059. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.880059

Received: 20 February 2022; Accepted: 25 February 2022;
Published: 10 March 2022.

Edited and reviewed by:

Oladele Ogunseitan, University of California, United States

Copyright © 2022 Zhang, Sharifan and Ma. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Weilan Zhang, wzhang4@albany.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.