Stefano Basso
Tor Haakon Bakken- 1Department of Catchment Hydrology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, Halle (Saale), Germany
- 2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
Editorial on the Research Topic
Reconciling Small Hydropower and Ecosystem Services in River Basins
The global proliferation of small hydropower is fostered by the international agenda and national strategies on renewable energy, its importance for rural communities not connected to centralised electricity services and its contribution towards meeting renewable energy targets (Couto and Olden, 2018). Small hydropower plants are often built in pristine river basins which can be hotspots of biodiversity, and in cascade installations with disturbances replicated along river courses. Whereas knowledge of environmental threats posed by dams informs advocacy and solutions for more sustainable large hydropower (Winemiller et al., 2016), awareness of the peculiar effects of small hydropower on hydrological and ecological dynamics is still forming (Lange et al., 2018). A better comprehension of the individual as well as the cumulative impacts of small hydropower on riverine ecosystems is one of the most important global issues for environmental conservation (Sutherland et al., 2020). Such a mechanistic understanding and the availability of tools to integrate this knowledge into spatial planning and design processes may indeed promote sustainable tradeoffs between the preservation of ecosystem functions and energy production by means of small hydropower (Basso et al., 2020). The articles in this research topic effectively showcase the multidisciplinary expertise required to achieve these goals.
Two studies examine different facets of riverine ecology. Negro et al. review the current knowledge of physical habitat preferences of more than thirty freshwater fish species which populate Italian rivers. They find scarce information for one third of them, especially for the most threatened endemic species during the critical spawning period. An exemplary application of the collected information by means of a mesoscale habitat simulation model demonstrate their value for predicting fish distribution in a hydropower impacted river reach. Aksamit et al. experimentally analyze the response of drifting and benthic macroinvertebrate communities to consecutive hydropeaking events generated by a small hydropower installation. Unexpectedly, they find that macroinvertebrate abundance and composition do not vary between peaks, but considerable differences in the drift were found between pools and riffles. Their findings stress the danger linked to direct application of results from flume investigations and call for more on-site experiments and monitoring.
Two further studies document how the selection of alternative methodological approaches and multi-criteria assessment tools can lead to different conclusions regarding design and development of small hydropower projects. Vassoney et al. compare several established multi-criteria decision making techniques, analyzing their strengths and weaknesses, assessing the robustness of their rankings to varying weighting coefficients and evaluating how the choice of a specific methodology may affect the final decision. Perona et al. investigate the hydro-ecological and energy efficiency of variable environmental flows, signaling that the choice and aggregation method of different hydrological and fish habitat indicators strongly affect the overall performance of water allocation policies. Their study also emphasizes the specificity of small run-of-river vs large hydropower with reservoirs, revealing that the unquestioning adoption of widely-accepted methodologies to quantify hydrological alteration developed for the latter leads to biased selection of optimal distribution policies for small run-of-river hydropower.
The complex nature of the alterations induced by small hydropower on riverine dynamics and the intricacy of identifying effective solutions which accounts for manifold objectives demand for the joint contribution of several disciplines to improve environmental performance, which will further affect public perception (Venus et al., 2020) and acceptance of this form of renewable energy production.
Author Contributions
SB drafted the manuscript and TB contributed to its revision. Both authors made a contribution to the work and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Basso, S., Lazzaro, G., Bovo, M., Soulsby, C., and Botter, G. (2020). Water-energy-ecosystem Nexus in Small Run-Of-River Hydropower: Optimal Design and Policy. Appl. Energ. 280, 115936. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115936
Couto, T. B., and Olden, J. D. (2018). Global Proliferation of Small Hydropower Plants - Science and Policy. Front. Ecol. Environ. 16 (2), 91–100. doi:10.1002/fee.1746
Lange, K., Meier, P., Trautwein, C., Schmid, M., Robinson, C. T., Weber, C., et al. (2018). Basin-scale Effects of Small Hydropower on Biodiversity Dynamics. Front. Ecol. Environ. 16, 397–404. doi:10.1002/fee.1823
Sutherland, W. J., Dias, M. P., Dicks, L. V., Doran, H., Entwistle, A. C., Fleishman, E., et al. (2020). A Horizon Scan of Emerging Global Biological Conservation Issues for 2020. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35 (1), 81–90. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2019.10.010
Venus, T. E., Hinzmann, M., Bakken, T. H., Gerdes, H., Godinho, F. N., Hansen, B., et al. (2020). The Public's Perception of Run-Of-The-River Hydropower across Europe. Energy Policy 140, 111422. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111422
Keywords: small hydropower, hydropeaking, habitat preference, multi-criteria, water allocation, hydro-ecological alteration, macroinvertebrate, ecosystem services
Citation: Basso S and Bakken TH (2022) Editorial: Reconciling Small Hydropower and Ecosystem Services in River Basins. Front. Environ. Sci. 10:874065. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.874065
Received: 11 February 2022; Accepted: 25 February 2022;
Published: 04 April 2022.
Edited and reviewed by:
Angela Helen Arthington, Griffith University, AustraliaCopyright © 2022 Basso and Bakken. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Stefano Basso, stefano.basso@ufz.de; Tor Haakon Bakken, tor.h.bakken@ntnu.no