AUTHOR=Choudhary Anil K. , Sood Pankaj , Rahi Shakuntla , Yadav D. S. , Thakur O. C. , Siranta K. R. , Dass Anchal , Singh Y. V. , Kumar Adarsh , Vijayakumar S. , Bhupenchandra Ingudam , Dua V. K. , Shivadhar  , Bana R. S. , Pooniya Vijay , Sepat Seema , Kumar Sushil , Rajawat Mahendra Vikram Singh , Rajanna G. A. , Harish M. N. , Varatharajan T. , Kumar Anil , Tyagi Vishal 

TITLE=Rice Productivity, Zn Biofortification, and Nutrient-Use Efficiency as Influenced by Zn Fertilization Under Conventional Transplanted Rice and the System of Rice Intensification

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Environmental Science

VOLUME=10

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/environmental-science/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.869194

DOI=10.3389/fenvs.2022.869194

ISSN=2296-665X

ABSTRACT=<p>The northwestern Himalayas (NWH) in India have low rice productivity (∼2 t ha<sup>−1</sup>) and quality due to poor crop and nutrient management in predominantly Zn-deficient soils. Hence, a field experimentation in the NWH compared the conventionally transplanted rice (CTR) and the system of rice intensification <bold>(</bold>SRI) under three nutrient management practices (NMPs), <italic>viz</italic>., 1) farmers’ fertilization practice, FYM @ 5 t ha<sup>−1</sup> + N:P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>:K<sub>2</sub>O @ 50:40:20 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> (FFP); 2) recommended dose of fertilization, FYM @ 10 t ha<sup>−1</sup> + N:P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>:K<sub>2</sub>O @ 90:40:40 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> (RDF); and 3) RDF + Zn fertilization using ZnSO<sub>4</sub> @ 25 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> (RDF + Zn). The results revealed that SRI practice harnessed a significantly higher rice yield under different NMPs (6.59–8.69 t ha<sup>−1</sup>) with ∼1.3–1.4- and ∼3.3–4.3-fold enhancements over the CTR and average rice productivity in NWH, respectively. SRI had the greatest improvement in panicle number hill<sup>−1</sup> by ∼2.4 folds over the CTR. RDF + Zn had a significantly higher grain (10.7; 7.9%) and straw yield (28.9; 19.7%) over FFP and RDF, respectively, with significant augmentation of Zn biofortification in grains (11.8%) and Zn uptake (23.9%) over the RDF. SRI also enhanced the Zn concentrations in rice grains and straws by ∼4.0 and 2.7% over CTR with respective increases of 36.9 and 25.9% in Zn uptake. The nutrient harvest index and partial factor productivity of applied nutrients (NPK) had a higher magnitude under SRI and RDF + Zn over their respective counterparts, i.e., CTR and RDF. In addition, SRI had higher AE-Zn, CRE-Zn, and PE-Zn to the tune of 119.6, 63.4, and 34%, respectively, over the CTR. Overall, SRI coupled with RDF + Zn in hybrid rice assumes greater significance in enhancing the rice productivity with better Zn-biofortified grains besides higher nutrient use efficiencies to combat widespread malnutrition and acute Zn deficiencies in humans and livestock in the northwestern Himalayas.</p>