Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Environ. Econ.
Sec. Ecological Economics
Volume 3 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/frevc.2024.1452416

"ESG Score" vs. "ESG Rating": A Conceptual Framework for the Sustainability Assessment and Self-Assessment of European SMEs

Provisionally accepted
Valeria Antonelli Valeria Antonelli Pina Murè Pina Murè Saverio Giorgio Saverio Giorgio *Antonino Crisafulli Antonino Crisafulli
  • Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The paper presents a conceptual model, which materializes in the development of a questionnaire, useful for analyzing the technical-organizational determinants that facilitate the sustainability transition of small and medium-sized enterprises (also “SMEs”). This model aims to facilitate access to green and social financing offered by banks, and to optimize relationships with the supply chain leaders in a sustainable supply chain logic and in line with the new European Union (also “EU”) regulations. Considering the lack of scoring and rating systems focused on SME’s, the lack of direct normative for their sustainability transition and their simplified governance structure, a questionnaire was developed. This instrument serves to highlight SME’s strengths and weaknesses in the transition process and their related needs, and to underline the actions to enhance the sustainability transition to facilitate their self-assessment. For banks the questionnaire is a tool to assess the sustainability of their customers and redefine the offer of green and social credit products with respect to the needs of SMEs; supply chain leaders to ensure a sustainable supply chain, assess and support SMEs in their sustainability transition. The questionnaire is the result of the modification of the one used by a data provider to determine an Environmental (E), Social (S) and Governance (G) (also “ESG”) Score which does not reflect the peculiarities of SMEs. The proposed questionnaire, instead, can be used to obtain an ESG Score coherent with the characteristics of SMEs and adopts a forward-looking approach, proposing actions for the E, S and G to enhance the sustainability transition. It is composed of 31 questions: 5 in the preliminary analysis section; 13 Governance questions that assess SMEs' ability to establish strategies, organizational structures and policies for their sustainability transition; 7 Social questions that aim to examine the management of social responsibilities; 8 Environmental questions that assess the corporate policies and practices adopted by SMEs regarding environmental management. The questionnaire is currently being tested, administered to SMEs customers of a local bank and to SMEs that are suppliers of a supply chain, and may be modified based on the responses received.

    Keywords: Conceptual Model, ESG score, ESG rating, Banks, Supply chain leader, sustainability transition, SMEs, Self-Assessment

    Received: 20 Jun 2024; Accepted: 09 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Antonelli, Murè, Giorgio and Crisafulli. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Saverio Giorgio, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.