Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Environ. Archaeol.
Sec. Archaeological Isotope Analysis
Volume 3 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fearc.2024.1470375
This article is part of the Research Topic Stable Isotope Analysis of Archaeobotanical Remains View all 3 articles

Recommendations for stable isotope analysis of charred archaeological crop remains

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • 2 The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
  • 3 Durham University, Durham, England, United Kingdom
  • 4 Lund University, Lund, Skane County, Sweden
  • 5 Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
  • 6 Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada
  • 7 Headland Archaeology, Hereford, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Stable isotope analysis of plant remains recovered from archaeological sites is becoming more routine. There remains a lack of consensus, however, on how to appropriately select archaeological plant remains for isotopic analysis, how to account for differences in preservation and the effect of potential contamination, and how to interpret the measured isotope values in terms of the conditions in which the plants grew. In this paper, we outline the main issues to be considered when planning and conducting an isotopic study of archaeobotanical remains. These include: 1) setting out the research question(s) that will be answerable using available analytical approaches, 2) considering the archaeological context from which plant remains derive, 3) determining appropriate sample size through consideration of estimate precision, 4) establishing the conditions in which plant remains have been preserved and potential effects on their isotope values, and 5) accounting for possible contamination during deposition. With these issues in mind, we propose some recommendations for researchers to consider when planning and conducting an isotopic study of archaeobotanical remains.

    Keywords: Carbon, Nitrogen, d 13 C, d 15 N, Agriculture, archaeobotany Font: Italic

    Received: 25 Jul 2024; Accepted: 04 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Styring, Vaiglova, Bogaard, Church, Gröcke, Larsson, Liu, Stroud, Szpak and Wallace. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Amy Styring, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.