95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
Rolla Almodfer1
Mohammed Mudhsh1
Samah Alshathri2*
Laith Abualigah3,4
Mohamed Abd Elaziz5,6,7*
Khurram Shahzad8
Mohamed Issa9- 1School of Information Engineering, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, China
- 2Department of Information Technology, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- 3Faculty of Computer Sciences and Informatics, Amman Arab University, Amman, Jordan
- 4School of Computer Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, George Town, Malaysia
- 5Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Galala University, Suez, Egypt
- 6Artificial Intelligence Research Center (AIRC), Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
- 7Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
- 8Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- 9Computer and Systems Department, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
A Corrigendum on
Improving parameter estimation of fuel cell using honey badger optimization algorithm
by Almodfer R, Mudhsh M, Alshathri S, Abualigah L, Abd Elaziz M, Shahzad K and Issa M (2022). Front. Energy Res. 10:875332. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2022.875332
In the published article, there was an error in the legend for “Figure 2” as published “slowly while using digging for catching it.” The corrected legend appears below.
“Polarization curve of the PEMFC system (Famouri and Gemmen, 2003) showing the regions dominated by activation loss, ohmic loss, and concentration loss using HBA”.
In the published article, there was an error in “Table 2” as published “values of lower and upper limits of ξ2 ξ3 ξ4 and Rc (Ω).” The corrected “Table 2” and its caption “Two parameter ranges of PEMFC parameters” appear below.
Table 2
Table 2. Two parameter ranges of PEMFC parameters.
In the published article, there was an error in “Table 4” as published “lambda value.” The corrected “Table 4” and its caption “Estimated 250 W’s parameters” appear below.
Table 4
Table 4. Estimated 250 W’s parameters.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: parameter extracting, fuel cells, optimization, proton exchange membrane fuel cell, honey badger optimization algorithm
Citation: Almodfer R, Mudhsh M, Alshathri S, Abualigah L, Abd Elaziz M, Shahzad K and Issa M (2025) Corrigendum: Improving parameter estimation of fuel cell using honey badger optimization algorithm. Front. Energy Res. 13:1588458. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2025.1588458
Received: 06 March 2025; Accepted: 14 March 2025;
Published: 31 March 2025.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2025 Almodfer, Mudhsh, Alshathri, Abualigah, Abd Elaziz, Shahzad and Issa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mohamed Abd Elaziz, YWJkX2VsX2F6aXpfbUB5YWhvby5jb20=; Samah Alshathri, c2VhbHNoYXRocnlAcG51LmVkdS5zYQ==