Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Energy Res. , 21 February 2025

Sec. Process and Energy Systems Engineering

Volume 13 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2025.1532293

This article is part of the Research Topic Optimal Design and Efficiency Improvement of Fluid Machinery and Systems: Volume III View all 7 articles

Editorial: Optimal design and efficiency improvement of fluid machinery and systems: volume III

  • 1College of Hydraulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Fluid and Power Machinery, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • 3National Research Center of Pumps, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
  • 4Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
  • 5College of Energy and Electrical Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, China
  • 6College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
  • 7Centre of Industrial Diagnostics and Fluid Dynamics (CDIF), Universitat Politècnica Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona, Spain

Introduction

Fluid machinery plays a pivotal role in energy and industrial systems, where performance, efficiency, and reliability drive technological advancements. The complexity of fluid dynamics, coupled with increasing demands for sustainability and efficiency, underscores the need for innovative research to tackle design and operational challenges. This Research Topic, Optimal Design and Efficiency Improvement of Fluid Machinery and Systems: Volume III, features six cutting-edge studies that address these challenges through two key themes: performance optimization and efficiency enhancement, and the analysis of flow dynamics and operational transitions.

Performance analysis and efficiency enhancement

Efficient operation is essential for enhancing the performance and reliability of fluid machinery, particularly in hydraulic and hydrogen-based systems. Optimizing volumetric efficiency, minimizing leakage, and validating performance parameters through rigorous testing are pivotal to achieving these goals. This section synthesizes findings from three studies, offering significant insights into the advancement of fluid machinery technologies.

Yang et al. explored the efficiency performance of a large vertical submersible mixed-flow pump using model and prototype tests, reporting a maximum efficiency of 77.8% and a conversion efficiency of 80.33%, respectively. The study underscored the complementary roles of these testing methods, demonstrating that prototype tests provide critical validation under diverse operating conditions. Similarly, Zhai et al.; Zhai et al. investigated the leakage characteristics and volumetric efficiency of hydrogen circulation pumps (HCPs) employed in fuel cell systems. By introducing a refined leakage flow calculation formula, the authors reduced the average error to 3.82%, significantly improving prediction accuracy compared to traditional methods. Furthermore, the development of a three-blade elliptical conjugate rotor design revealed that radial clearance leakage exceeds axial clearance leakage, providing practical design insights for minimizing internal leakage and enhancing the efficiency of hydrogen recovery systems.

These studies collectively highlight the importance of integrating experimental validation, advanced simulation techniques, and innovative design strategies in addressing complex challenges in fluid machinery. Their findings contribute to the development of high-performance systems, supporting the transition to more efficient and sustainable energy solutions.

Flow dynamics and operational transitions

Understanding flow dynamics is crucial for ensuring the stability, efficiency, and operational flexibility of fluid systems. By investigating pressure pulsations, energy losses, and operational transitions, recent studies provide actionable insights to enhance system responsiveness and reliability under varying conditions.

Lu et al. analyzed pressure pulsation characteristics in the vaneless region of a pump-turbine operating in turbine mode under different head conditions. Their unsteady numerical simulations identified significant pressure fluctuations caused by rotor-stator interaction (RSI), with dominant frequencies at half the blade passing frequency (BPF). Wang et al. employed entropy generation theory to explore energy loss distributions in a guide vane centrifugal pump operating as a turbine. They highlighted the critical role of impeller-guide vane interactions in energy losses, especially under off-design conditions, offering strategies for optimizing internal flow. Man et al. investigated the transition process of pump turbines switching from pump to turbine mode without the use of a ball valve. Through torque balance equations and entropy production theory, they revealed distinct transition stages characterized by sharp fluctuations in pressure, torque, and axial force, providing insights to improve operational flexibility and enable rapid, stable transitions during emergency scenarios.

These studies underscore the importance of integrating experimental, theoretical, and computational methodologies to tackle the dynamic challenges of fluid machinery systems. Their findings contribute to optimizing performance, mitigating instability, and ensuring adaptability in complex operational environments.

Broader implications and summary

Together, the articles in this Research Topic advance fluid machinery research by addressing critical challenges in performance optimization, leakage reduction, energy loss analysis, and operational flexibility. By integrating experimental validation with advanced numerical simulations, the studies collectively highlight practical pathways for improving system performance and design. Moreover, they contribute to a broader understanding of fluid machinery’s role in achieving sustainable and efficient operations.

The editors extend their gratitude to the authors for their significant contributions, to the reviewers for their constructive feedback, and to the editorial board for their unwavering support. These collective efforts have enriched the discourse on fluid machinery, fostering innovation and progress in the field.

Author contributions

YY: Writing–original draft. LJ: Writing–review and editing. RA: Writing–review and editing. KK: Writing–review and editing. RT: Writing–review and editing. AP: Writing–review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This editorial was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos 52409122; 52309112), Cooperative Research Project of the Ministry of Education’s “Chunhui Program” (Grant No. HZKY20220117), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20220587), Open Research Subject of Key Laboratory of Fluid Machinery and Engineering (Xihua University), Sichuan Province (Grant No. LTDL-2024005), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No.2022TQ0127).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: fluid machinery and system, optimal design, efficiency improvement, pressure pulsation dynamics, computational fluid dynamics

Citation: Yang Y, Ji L, Agarwal RK, Kan K, Tao R and Presas A (2025) Editorial: Optimal design and efficiency improvement of fluid machinery and systems: volume III. Front. Energy Res. 13:1532293. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2025.1532293

Received: 21 November 2024; Accepted: 14 February 2025;
Published: 21 February 2025.

Edited and reviewed by:

Ellen B. Stechel, Arizona State University, United States

Copyright © 2025 Yang, Ji, Agarwal, Kan, Tao and Presas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Leilei Ji, bGVpbGVpamlAdWpzLmVkdS5jbg==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more