94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CORRECTION article
Front. Energy Res.
Sec. Sustainable Energy Systems
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2024.1484628
Corrigendum: Effects of Window Films in Thermo-Solar Properties of Office Buildings in Hot-Arid Climates
Provisionally accepted
Ahmad Sedaghat 1 Seyed Amir Abbas Oloomi 2 Mahdi Ashtian Malayer 2 Fadi Alkhatib 1
Farhad Sabri 1
Mohammad Sabati 1 Hayder Salem 1 Waqar Jan Zafar 1 Ali Mostafaeipour 3 Alibek Issakhov 4
Mehdi Jahangiri 5
Kuaanan Techato 6*
Shahariar Chowdhury 7- 1 Australian College of Kuwait, Kuwait City, Kuwait
- 2 Islamic Azad University, shahre kord, Iran
- 3 California State University, Fullerton, Fullerton, California, United States
- 4 Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
- 5 Kazakh-British Technical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
- 6 Faculty of Environmental Management, Hat Yai Campus, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand
- 7 Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.• In the published article, there was an error in [Figure 8,9,10,11,12] as published.Information month "July" was missing. The corrected [8,9,10,11,12] and its caption The corrected sentence appears below:"[A systematic method was presented to develop a monthly PDF (probability density function) indicator using a rational function for parameters of interest such as temperature, humidity, and illuminance.The offices with window films always possessed 5 to 10% higher humidity compared with offices without windows films.The offices with window films always possessed lower temperatures between 2 degrees and 5 degrees Celsius compared with offices without window films.The lux intensity was reduced by applying window films particularly during the peak solar radiation of the day around 3 to 4 pm. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.End of template, if you would like to request a correction for a reason not seen here, please contact the journal's Editorial Office • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Keywords: CO2 footprint, Energy saving, Illuminance, Kernel Density Estimation, Office building, Solar window film
Received: 20 Nov 2024; Accepted: 18 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Sedaghat, Abbas Oloomi, Malayer, Alkhatib, Sabri, Sabati, Salem, Zafar, Mostafaeipour, Issakhov, Jahangiri, Techato and Chowdhury. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Kuaanan Techato, Faculty of Environmental Management, Hat Yai Campus, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.