Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Energy Res.
Sec. Energy Efficiency
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2024.1480098
This article is part of the Research Topic Energy Management, Energy Efficiency Policies, and Energy System Studies View all 5 articles

Energy renovation of Swedish single-family houses-a survey of barriers, drivers, and green loans

Provisionally accepted
Pardis Niknafs Pardis Niknafs 1,2*Gustav Holmqvist Gustav Holmqvist 2Patrik Thollander Patrik Thollander 2Patrik Rohdin Patrik Rohdin 2
  • 1 Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
  • 2 Division of Energy Systems, Department of Management and Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Östergötland, Sweden

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    According to the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive, 55% of the EU's emission reductions will require renovations of the least efficient buildings. Therefore, it is important to gain a deeper understanding of how owners of single-family houses perceive energy efficiency measures, energy renovation, and barriers and drivers that influence their decision-making. Moreover, the homeowner's perception of green loans is important, as one piece of the puzzle in how to finance these implementations. Swedish single-family houses account for 40% of residential energy use and 45% of heated area, and they are mostly privately owned. These decision-making processes are, to a large degree, unknown, as the main focus has been on professional actors and tenants, not on singlefamily and privately owned buildings. This paper presents the perspective of these owners and discussions related to their decision-making. It is therefore important to evaluate the barriers and drivers involved in this decision-making process from the perspective of house owners, and to include socio-economic factors as well as the potential for green loans. This study includes singlefamily house owners in two cities of different sizes who responded to a survey regarding their perspectives on energy renovation. The results showed that homeowners with lower incomes were more neutral about barriers to energy renovation. In contrast, house owners with higher incomes, and those who moved into their houses more recently, prioritized other types of renovations and investment over energy renovations. According to households where the respondents were over 60 years old, barriers such as lack of capital and time are not perceived as significant barriers to energy renovation. Moreover, this study showed that households with younger owners, those who moved recently to their homes, and those with higher incomes, are more likely to take loans for energy renovations. For these younger households and those who moved into their houses relatively recently a window of opportunity could therefore be identified, where tailored policies can be targeted toward the sector when houses are recently sold. In all cases, except for those over 70 years, respondents stated that green loans increased their interest in energy efficiency investments.

    Keywords: energy efficiency, Energy renovation, energy efficiency measures, Single-family houses, barriers, drivers, Green loans

    Received: 13 Aug 2024; Accepted: 06 Nov 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Niknafs, Holmqvist, Thollander and Rohdin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Pardis Niknafs, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.