Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Energy Res.
Sec. Sustainable Energy Systems
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2024.1385311
This article is part of the Research Topic Recent Advances in Energy Systems for Sustainable Development View all 7 articles

The Role of Product Market Competition and Analyst Attention in Modulating the Link Between Equity Pledges and Classification Shifting

Provisionally accepted
Ruixiang Xue Ruixiang Xue Jiao Lu Jiao Lu *Tzesan Ong Tzesan Ong
  • Putra Malaysia University, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    This study investigates the association between equity pledges and classification shifting earnings management in Chinese listed firms, with a specific focus on the energy sectors, spanning the period from 2016 to 2022. Additionally, it explores the moderating influence of product market competition (PMC) and analyst attention on this relationship. By analyzing a sample comprising 12,583 firm-year observations, several notable findings are observed. The regression results reveal a positive and statistically significant relationship between equity pledges and classification shifting earnings management (coefficient = 0.00234, p < 0.01). Moreover, this positive impact is further magnified when specifically considering downward classification shifting (coefficient = 0.00368, p < 0.01). Regarding the moderating factors, the results demonstrate a positive moderating effect of PMC on the relationship between equity pledges and classification shifting, with an interaction coefficient of 0.0165 (p < 0.01). This moderating effect is particularly pronounced in the context of downward classification shifting, with an interaction coefficient of 0.0142 (p < 0.01). Similarly, analyst attention also positively moderates the relationship, as indicated by an interaction coefficient of 0.00144 (p < 0.05), with a stronger effect observed in the case of downward classification shifting, with an interaction coefficient of 0.00329 (p < 0.01). Furthermore, additional tests reveal that leverage strengthens the aforementioned moderating effects. The three-way interaction involving debt, PMC, and equity pledges significantly influences classification shifting, with a coefficient of 0.0415 (p < 0.05). Specifically, debt exacerbates the moderating impact of competition on highly leveraged firms that engage in downward classification shifting, as evidenced by a coefficient of 0.0599 (p < 0.05). Similarly, debt reinforces the moderating role of analyst attention (coefficient = 0.00820, p < 0.05), especially for downward classification shifting (coefficient = 0.00902, p < 0.1). Propensity score matching and robustness tests validate the findings. Therefore, this research contributes to the understanding of the economic implications of equity pledge by focusing on earnings manipulation through classification shifting. It also examines this relationship within different competitive environments and external regulatory frameworks, aiming to promote the long-term viability of companies.

    Keywords: Equity pledge, Earnings manipulation through classification shifting, Product market competition, analyst attention, Leverage heterogeneity, Sustainability in energy sectors

    Received: 12 Feb 2024; Accepted: 25 Jun 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Xue, Lu and Ong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Jiao Lu, Putra Malaysia University, Selangor Darul Ehsan, 43400, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.