- 1IC2R srl, Bari, Italy
- 2Interuniversity Consortium on Chemical Reactivity and Catalysis–CIRCC, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
- 3Department of Chemistry, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
Editorial on the Research Topic
Beyond Current Research Trends in CO2 Utilization
The Carbon Circular Economy-CCE is a key component of the strategy for sustainable, climate-neutral growth of our society. CCE encompasses carbon management in all its forms and fields of application (energy sector, all manufacturing sectors including the chemical industry, agriculture and related practices, civil life) for an efficient reduction strategy that minimizes the emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs), and CO2 in particular, in all anthropic activities.
Carbon Dioxide emissions reduction is under particular pressure these days as CO2 is considered the origin of climate change. In our opinion, the protagonist of the extreme events we are observing of late (tornados, floodings and fires, desertification, and rising oceans) is the inefficient use we make of fossil-C that causes over 65% of the energy to be released in the form of heat to the atmosphere, in addition to too high emissions of all GHGs, including water vapor.
The reduction of CO2 emissions can be achieved primarily by reducing the consumption of fossil-C, and by changing primary energy sources or adopting a Nature-like strategy: the recycling of carbon.
The use of Renewable Carbon is a major attitude shift, and this stopping the linear model of taking fossil-C (formed over millions of years) and releasing CO2 (a spent form of carbon). Human intelligence must discover ways to develop a man-made Carbon Cycle, that can complement the natural one, one even more efficient in terms of rate and selectivity of processes. Vegetal plants make what they need, and a man-made carbon cycle can make what humans need: energy products, or alternatively molecular compounds necessary for everyday life, or else other materials. Nature uses the sun to power the synthetic processes; we can use sun, wind, hydropower, geothermal energy-SWHG, all C-free, perennial sources, to power synthetic processes. We call SWHG sources perennial as have always existed and will continue to exist in the future for as long as our planet does. We prefer to reserve the term renewable for biomass.
The cost of the change is high, as all technologies based on C-free perennial energy sources and even on renewable energy sources (biomass) are more costly than technologies based on fossil-C, and less efficient. Over two hundred years of Chemical Industry based on fossil-C has developed efficient syntheses for a single target product. Technologies based on perennial energies are much younger and need to develop and mature.
However, carbon recycling can be performed by Nature-based systems (growing any kind of biomass) or by man-made systems, e.g., by converting CO2 into chemicals, materials, and fuels. Biomass-based products are already on the market, CO2 based products must be developed in a legal frame and become accepted by the public. This will take time and education.
Nevertheless, it is time to implement CO2 utilization if we wish to reduce the use of fossil-C. Biomass alone cannot satisfy the needs of human beings (being limited by growth rate and amount). Complementing biomass with industrial processes may help to find a valid solution.
This Research Topic is devoted to making the point on what we do with CO2 and what we could do if perennial energy sources were available at a low cost. Most likely, by 2050 innovative synthetic strategies based on CO2 will be performing at high efficiency.
In Chapter 1 (Aresta and Dibenedetto), a perspective on future utilization of CO2 is outlined, highlighting barriers and ways to get around them. Any use of CO2 requires its availability: therefore, Chapter 2 (Wang and Song) makes the point on established techniques for CO2-capture and discusses the capture from air, where CO2 is present at a low concentration (410 ppm at present), but will guarantee its availability forever (fossil-C availability is finite). Chapter 3 (Baciocchi and Costa) presents a way to fix CO2 into materials that have a long lifetime: such materials are like natural rocks that sequester CO2, and the technology does not integrate into the circular economy: it is more functional to the linear economy for carbon dioxide sequestration. Chapter 4 (Zhang et al.) discusses the conversion of CO2 into methanol, a chemical with rich chemistry and an energy product at the same time (usable if fuel cells and mixed with gasoline in cars). Chapter 5 (Centi et al.) is a complementary aspect of methanol synthesis as it makes a point on the economics of methanol production. As mentioned above, fossil-C substitution will raise costs issues as today fossil-C is a cheap source of raw materials and processes are optimized for both investment and operational costs, CAPEX and OPEX, respectively. Chapter 6 (Bogaerts and Centi) presents plasma technology for CO2 conversion, highlighting how fluctuating renewable energy can be used and stored as chemical energy. Chapter 7 (Tomishige et al.) exemplifies the use of CO2 in the production of large market chemicals, namely organic carbonates that may find application in several sectors such as solvents, raw materials, monomers for polymers, a medium in lithium batteries, etc. Chapter 8 (Kondaveeti et al.) introduces new systems for CO2 conversion, e.g., biosystems coupled to electricity. This is an attractive new area that can contribute to CO2 utilization on a large scale making a variety of products according to the bio-system (microorganism) used. Chapter 9 (Gerotto et al.) makes light on the organisms in Nature which convert CO2 the fastest: microalgae, a fascinating world that has a great potential for application in the synthesis of fuels or chemicals or materials. Finally, Chapter 10 (Kumar et al.) opens a window on the use of biomass highlighting problems that are around when one wishes to use such raw materials as a source of chemicals or energy.
All together, this book presents interesting aspects of the potential of carbon recycling, and the difficulties that one encounters when facing such stimulating and innovative technology, barriers to full exploitation of the strategy, and how to go around them.
Author Contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Conflict of Interest
MA was employed by the company IC2R srl.
The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: Carbon Circular Economy-CCE, renewable carbon, biomass conversion, CO2 conversion, GHGs
Citation: Aresta M and Dibenedetto A (2022) Editorial: Beyond Current Research Trends in CO2 Utilization. Front. Energy Res. 10:814311. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2022.814311
Received: 13 November 2021; Accepted: 05 January 2022;
Published: 08 February 2022.
Edited and reviewed by:
Ah-Hyung Alissa Park, Columbia University, United StatesCopyright © 2022 Aresta and Dibenedetto. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Michele Aresta, YS5kaWJlbmVkZXR0b0BjaGltaWNhLnVuaWJhLml0; Angela Dibenedetto, YW5nZWxhLmRpYmVuZWRldHRvQHVuaWJhLml0