RETRACTED: Bi-Level Optimization Dispatch of Integrated-Energy Systems With P2G and Carbon Capture

Zhang, Zongnan; Du, Jun; Li, Menghan; Guo, Jing; Xu, Zhenyang; Li, Weikang

doi:10.3389/fenrg.2021.784703

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Energy Res. , 12 January 2022

Sec. Process and Energy Systems Engineering

Volume 9 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.784703

RETRACTED: Bi-Level Optimization Dispatch of Integrated-Energy Systems With P2G and Carbon Capture

Updated

A retraction of this article was approved in:

Retraction: Bi-level optimization dispatch of integrated-energy systems with P2G and carbon capture
1. Read retraction
RETRACTED: Corrigendum: Bi-level optimization dispatch of integrated-energy systems with P2G and carbon capture
1. Read correction

Zongnan Zhang

Jun Du*

Menghan Li

Jing Guo

Zhenyang Xu

Weikang Li

School of Energy and Power, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, China

This article has been retracted. Please follow the link to the full retraction notice for details.

Citation: Zhang Z, Du J, Li M, Guo J, Xu Z and Li W (2022) Bi-Level Optimization Dispatch of Integrated-Energy Systems With P2G and Carbon Capture. Front. Energy Res. 9:784703. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2021.784703

Received: 28 September 2021; Accepted: 01 December 2021;
Published: 12 January 2022; Retracted: 24 September 2024.

Edited by:

Zahra Hajabdollahi, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom

Reviewed by:

Rohit Bhakar, Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur, India
Hongxun Hui, University of Macau, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

RETRACTED: Bi-Level Optimization Dispatch of Integrated-Energy Systems With P2G and Carbon Capture

95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good