data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CORRECTION article
Front. Energy Res. , 18 March 2019
Sec. Fuel Cells, Electrolyzers and Membrane Reactors
Volume 7 - 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2019.00025
This article is part of the Research Topic Microbial Fuel Cells: from Fundamentals to Applications View all 7 articles
This article is a correction to:
Toward an Energy Efficient Wastewater Treatment: Combining a Microbial Fuel Cell/Electrolysis Cell Anode With an Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor
A Corrigendum on
Toward an Energy Efficient Wastewater Treatment: Combining a Microbial Fuel Cell/Electrolysis Cell Anode With an Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor
by Kocatürk-Schumacher, N. P., Madjarov, J., Viwatthanasittiphong, P., and Kerzenmacher, S. (2018). Front. Energy Res. 6:95. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2018.00095
In the original article, unfortunately, the anode potential of the chronoamperometry experiments has not been reported. A correction has been made to the Materials and Methods, Experimental Setup, paragraph two:
“A Gamry PCI4/300 potentiostat (Gamry Instruments, Warminster, USA) was used for analyzing electrochemical activities of the anode in a 3 electrode setup with a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as reference electrode (KE11, Sensortechnik Meinsberg, Germany) in all experiments. All chronoamperometry experiments were carried out at an anode potential of −0.241 V vs. SCE, except during the cleaning step in the electrochemical cleaning experiments. The potentials given in V vs. SHE were calculated by adding 0.241 V to the potential measured vs. the SCE reference electrode. Counter electrodes were made from a platinum mesh (No. 900338, Chempur GmbH, Germany). All electrode positions are depicted in Figure 2. The default three-electrode positions are chosen as to minimize losses caused by uncompensated resistance (iR-drop).”
The authors apologize for this inconvenience and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Keywords: bioelectrochemical systems, AnMBR, filtering anode, microbial anode, fouling mitigation, electrochemical cleaning, turbulence promotor
Citation: Kocatürk-Schumacher NP, Madjarov J, Viwatthanasittiphong P and Kerzenmacher S (2019) Corrigendum: Toward an Energy Efficient Wastewater Treatment: Combining a Microbial Fuel Cell/Electrolysis Cell Anode With an Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor. Front. Energy Res. 7:25. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2019.00025
Received: 13 February 2019; Accepted: 15 February 2019;
Published: 18 March 2019.
Approved by:
Frontiers in Energy Research, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2019 Kocatürk-Schumacher, Madjarov, Viwatthanasittiphong and Kerzenmacher. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sven Kerzenmacher, a2VyemVubWFjaGVyQHVuaS1icmVtZW4uZGU=
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.