AUTHOR=Williams C. Luke , Li Chenlin , Hu Hongqiang , Allen Jared C. , Thomas Brad J. TITLE=Three Way Comparison of Hydrophilic Ionic Liquid, Hydrophobic Ionic Liquid, and Dilute Acid for the Pretreatment of Herbaceous and Woody Biomass JOURNAL=Frontiers in Energy Research VOLUME=6 YEAR=2018 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/energy-research/articles/10.3389/fenrg.2018.00067 DOI=10.3389/fenrg.2018.00067 ISSN=2296-598X ABSTRACT=
This paper examines the efficacy of ionic liquid (IL) pretreatment on seven different commercially harvested biomass types: corn stover, miscanthus, pine, sorghum, sugarcane bagasse, switchgrass, and wheat straw in an effort to improve the production of renewable fuels and chemicals from biomass derived sugars. Initial experiments screened the pretreatment of lodgepole pine, a particularly recalcitrant biomass feedstock, with nine different imidazolium based ionic liquids. After screening, one hydrophilic and one hydrophobic ionic liquid was selected for pretreatment tests on six commercially harvested biomasses. Ultimately, the hydrophilic ionic liquid functioned better for biomass pretreatment than the hydrophobic ionic liquid. These results were then compared to a traditional dilute acid pretreatment to examine the relative effectiveness of ionic liquid pretreatment across a variety of biomass and ionic liquid types. Total theoretical sugar yields after IL pretreatment varied widely by IL and biomass type and ranged from 4.9 to 90.2%. Dilute acid pretreatment showed consistent sugar yields for herbaceous material (from 71.4 to 80.8%) but low yield for lodgepole pine (22.8%). Overall, ILs showed the potential to reach slightly higher sugar yields than dilute acid and were particularly effective for woody feedstocks. More importantly, the sugar release kinetics for IL pretreatment were three times faster than dilute acid and gave maximum sugar yields after about 24 h. Additional characterization of IL treated materials included scanning electron microscopy (SEM), x-ray diffraction (XRD), and compositional analysis. SEM and XRD showed qualitative and quantitative reductions in cellulose crystallinity (respectively) that correlated well to improved sugar release during enzymatic hydrolysis for hydrophilic ionic liquids. However, reductions in crystallinity associated with hydrophobic ionic liquids resulted in lower sugar release during enzymatic hydrolysis. Compositional analysis generally showed increased sugars content for hydrophilic ILs and increased lignin content for hydrophobic ILs.