Corrigendum: Predictive and prognostic nomogram models for liver metastasis in colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms: a large population study

Xiao Lei¹Yanwei Su^1,2Rui Lei³Dong Yang Zhang⁴Zimeng Liu¹Xiangke Li¹Min Jie Yang¹Jiaxin Pei¹Yanyan Chi^1,2*Lijie Song^1,2*

• ¹First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
• ²Henan neuroendocrine tumor medical center, Zhengzhou, China, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
• ³Zhoukou first people’s hospital, Zhoukou, China
• ⁴School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan Province, China

Corrigendum: Predictive and prognostic nomogram models for liver metastasis in colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms: a large population studyCorrigendum on: AUTHOR=Lei Xiao , Su Yanwei , Lei Rui , Zhang Dongyang , Liu Zimeng , Li Xiangke , Yang Minjie , Pei Jiaxin , Chi Yanyan , Song Lijie TITLE=Predictive and prognostic nomogram models for liver metastasis in colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms: a large population studyJOURNAL=Frontiers in EndocrinologyVOLUME=15YEAR=2025URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/endocrinology/articles/10.3389/fendo.2024.1488733DOI=10.3389/fendo.2024.1488733ISSN=1664-2392 Error in Figure/Table LegendIn the published article, there was an error in the legend for [Figure 2A] as published. [Due to the change of the website name, the QR code in the original picture has become invalid.]. The corrected legend appears below. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.Text CorrectionIn the published article, there was some errors. [Due to writing errors, several mistakes have occurred in the original text].1. A correction has been made to [Abstract], [Results:], [Lines 2 to 5].This sentence previously stated:“[The result of multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that histologic type, tumorgrade, T stage, N stage, lung metastasis, bone metastasis, and tumor size were independent predictive factors for LM in patients with CRNENs (p < 0.05).]”The corrected sentence appears below:“[The result of multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that histologic type, tumorgrade, T stage, N stage, lung metastasis, bone metastasis, surgery, and tumor size were independent predictive factors for LM in patients with CRNENs (p < 0.05).]”The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.2. A correction has been made to [3 Result], [3.2 Risk factors and predictive nomogram for LM in CRNETs], [3.2.1 Risk factors analysis of LM in CRNETs] This sentence previously stated:“[The results of univariate logistic demonstrate that age, gender, race, histologic type, Grade, Tstage, N stage, lung metastasis, bone metastasis, and tumor size are factors related to the occurrence of LM in patients with CRNENs (Table 3; p < 0.05). Multivariable logistic analysis results revealed that histologic type, Grade, T stage, N stage, lung metastasis, bone metastasis, and tumor size are the independent influencing factors for LM in patients with CRNENs (Table 3).]”“[In contrast, the histological type (8240;8244;8510) may be the protective indicator (Table 3; OR < 1;p < 0.05).]”The corrected sentence appears below:“[The results of univariate logistic demonstrate that age, gender, race, histologic type, Grade, T stage, N stage, lung metastasis, bone metastasis, surgery, and tumor size are factors related to the occurrence of LM in patients with CRNENs (Table 3; p < 0.05). Multivariable logistic analysis results revealed that histologic type, Grade, T stage, N stage, lung metastasis, bone metastasis, surgery, and tumor size are the independent influencing factors for LM in patients with CRNENs (Table 3).]”“[In contrast, the histological type (8240;8244;8510) and surgery may be the protective indicator (Table 3; OR < 1;p < 0.05).]”3. A correction has been made to [3 Result], [3.2 Risk factors and predictive nomogramfor LM in CRNETs], [3.2.1 Risk factors analysis of LM in CRNETs].This sentence previously stated:“[3.2 Risk factors and predictive nomogram for LM in CRNETs 3.2.1 Risk factors analysis of LM in CRNETs3.2.2 The predictive nomogram for LM in CRNETs]”The corrected sentence appears below:“[3.2 Risk factors and predictive nomogram for LM in CRNENs 3.2.1 Risk factors analysis of LM in CRNENs3.2.2 The predictive nomogram for LM in CRNENs]”4.A correction has been made to [3 Result], [3.3 Prognostic factors and nomogram for LM-CRNENs], [3.3.1 Prognostic factors analysis of LM-CRNENs].This sentence previously stated:“Primary tumors originating in the rectum, histologic types 8240 and 8510, surgery, and chemotherapy were considered protective factors in prognosis (Table 4; HR < 1, p > 0.05). ”The corrected sentence appears below:“Primary tumors originating in the rectum, histologic types 8240 and 8510, surgery, and chemotherapy were considered protective factors in prognosis (Table 4; HR < 1, p＜0.05). ”The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.