
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Cardiovascular Endocrinology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1586541
This article is part of the Research Topic Molecular Biomarkers of Cardiometabolic Disease - Volume II View all 12 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background The Stress Hyperglycemia Ratio (SHR) is associated with poor outcomes in coronary artery disease patients, but its link to Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) prognosis is unclear. This study explores the relationship between SHR and 1-year outcomes after AMI using a large cohort analysis.Methods This retrospective study enrolled 4012 AMI patients from General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University(2016-2019). These patients were stratified into three distinct groups according to the tertiles of the SHR: Group T1 (SHR < 0.90, n=1337), Group T2 (0.90 ≤ SHR < 1.11, n=1337), and Group T3 (SHR ≥ 1.11, n=1338). All patients were clinically followed for 1-years to collect major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). After controlling for different confounding factors, cox regression models and restricted quadratic splines were used to investigate the relationship between SHR and 1-years clinical outcomes.Results During the 1-year follow-up, 229 all-cause deaths were recorded, yielding a mortality rate of 5.71% (n=229). Additionally, 861 MACCE were recorded, yielding a MACCE rate of 21.46%. After adjusting for covariates, SHR was found to be significantly associated with 1-year MACCE [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.18; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.64-2.89; P < 0.001] and all-cause mortality (HR = 3.11; 95% CI = 1.77-5.46; P < 0.001) in patients with AMI, and the T3 group exhibited a higher risk of 1-year MACCE (HR = 1.67; 95% CI = 1.34-2.09; P < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR = 1.67; 95% CI = 1.02-2.73; P =0.042) compared with T1 group. A J-shaped relationship was observed between SHR and 1-year MACCE as well as all-cause mortality, showing a turning point at 0.87. Beyond this threshold, the hazard ratio for 1-year MACCE was 2.64 (95% CI: 1.91-3.65), and for all-cause mortality was 4.26 (95%: CI 2.30-7.86). The results remained consistent across subgroup.Conclusion SHR is significantly and positively associated with one-year clinical outcomes in patients with AMI. Furthermore, there is a specific non-linear association between SHR and MACCE and all-cause mortality (both inflection point 0.87). Interventions aimed at reducing SHR levels below 0.87 through medication management have the potential to significantly improve outcomes.
Keywords: acute myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), stress hyperglycemia, Stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR), Long-term prognosis
Received: 03 Mar 2025; Accepted: 31 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yan, Wu, Zhang, Wang, Ma, Ma, Chen, Ma and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Ning Yan, Heart Centre & Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Henan Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.