Cost-effectiveness analysis of second-line medical therapies in acromegaly: a real-life study

Eva María Venegas Moreno ^1,2 Andrés Jiménez-Sánchez ^1,2* Pablo Remon-Ruiz ^1,2 Elena Dios ^1,2 Jaime Perea Cortés ² Celia Hernández-Reina ¹ David A. Cano ² Alfonso Soto Moreno ^1,2

• ¹ Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
• ² Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, IBiS/Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain

Acromegaly is an uncommon disease with important comorbidity and economic cost. Although the pharmacological cost of second-line treatment for refractory acromegaly has been theoretically analyzed, real-life studies are needed.To assess the use of pasireotide and pegvisomant in a third-level center under routine clinical practice.Methods: Acromegaly patients that had been treated with pasireotide and / or pegvisomant were included in (A) a cross-sectional study (two years after starting these drugs) to analyze the cost of acromegaly, hormone replacement, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treatments, and the cost of surgery and radiotherapy; and (B) a retrospective cohorts study (May 2006-October 2024) to analyze efficacy, safety (adverse events, fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin, and T2DM diagnosis), and dose evolution. Descriptive statistics were 10% trimmed means and standard deviation. Two-tailed hypothesis testing with Yuen's t and Fisher's test had a P < 0.05 significance.Results: 25 participants were included in the transversal study and 31 participants in the longitudinal study. A typical patient with a poorly granulated GH-producing adenoma underwent in-center surgery once and received radiotherapy. In (A), total pharmacological cost was 34,139.29 (13,472.09) €/person/year, with 33,874.88 (13,468.36) €/person/year for second-line acromegaly drugs. Pasireotide displayed 9,423.26 €/person/year worth of savings (P = .12), reaching 30,415.98 €/person/year at high dose (P < 0.001). In (B), pasireotide dose was reduced (P = .06) regardless of treatment modality. Pasireotide affected carbohydrate metabolism (P = .001), but the effect was generally mild.Conclusions: Pasireotide was found to be a more cost-effective option in patients with first-line treatment failure.