data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Bone Research
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1549068
This article is part of the Research Topic Imaging-Based Methods for Fracture Risk Assessment View all 6 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: Chemical shift encoded-based water-fat separation magnetic resonance imaging (CSE-MRI) is an emerging noninvasive tool for the assessment of bone and muscle composition. This study aims to examine both the predictive value and the longitudinal change of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and T2* in the paraspinal muscles (PSM) in patients with and without the development of an incidental vertebral compression fracture (VCFs) after 6 months of follow-up. Methods: Patients (N=56) with CT and 3T CSE-MRI of the lumbar spine at baseline and CSE-MRI at 6 months follow-up were included in this retrospective study. Patients who, on average, developed an incidental VCF one year after baseline MRI (VCF: N=14, 9 males, 66.8 ± 7.9 years) were frequency matched by age and sex to patients without VCFs (non-VCF) at baseline and follow-up (non-VCF: N=42, 27 males, 64.6 ± 13.3 years). Mean PDFF, T2*, and cross-sectional area (CSA) values from the autochthonous PSM of the thoracolumbar spine (T11-L4) and opportunistic CT-based bone mineral density (BMD) measurements were obtained for each individual. The associations between baseline measurements, longitudinal changes in PDFF, T2*, CSA of the PSM and the occurrence of VCFs at follow-up were evaluated using linear and logistic multivariable regression models. ROC analyses were used to assess cutoff values for predicting the development of VCFs.Results: No significant difference in PDFF of the PSM was found between the VCF and non-VCF group at baseline (VCF/non-VCF 8.5 ± 13.8% vs. 5.0 ± 4.6%; p=0.53). In multivariable linear regression models adjusted for sex, age and baseline BMD, PDFF values of the PSM increased significantly over 6 months in the VCF group (2.4 ± 2.8% vs. -1.0 ± 2.3%, p<0.001), while T2* values of the PSM showed a significant decrease (p≤0.01). ROC analyses identified a PDFF increase of 0.2% in the PSM as the optimal cutoff value to distinguish between patients with and without VCF (AUC 0.86, 95% CI [0.74-0.98], p<0.001). Conclusion: Longitudinal PDFF-based assessment of the PSM composition may be a useful indicator for the prediction of the development of vertebral compression fractures.
Keywords: Incidental vertebral compression fractures, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Muscle, Spine, proton density fat fraction, chemical shift encoded MRI, bone mineral density
Received: 20 Dec 2024; Accepted: 17 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Stohldreier, Leonhardt, Ketschau, Gassert, Makowski, Kirschke, Feuerriegel, Braun, Schwaiger, Karampinos, Hesse and Gersing. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Yannick Stohldreier, Department of Neuroradiology, LMU Munich University Hospital, Munich, 81377, Bavaria, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.