data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Bone Research
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1532355
This article is part of the Research Topic Imaging-Based Methods for Fracture Risk Assessment View all 6 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: To evaluate the association between thoracolumbar fascia injury (TLFI) and development of residual back pain (RBP) following percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA).Background: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) commonly affect elderly individuals and those with osteoporosis, leading to pain and limited mobility. Percutaneous vertebral augmentation provides immediate pain relief and stabilization of the fractures. However, some patients experience residual pain after the treatment. Although recent studies have suggested a potential association, the role of TLFI in RBP remains inconclusive. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate this association.Methods: A thorough search was performed across PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, databases from inception to December 31, 2024, to identify studies examining the link between TLFI and RBP following PVA. A random-effects model was used to combine the outcome data to account for the potential heterogeneity among the included studies.Results: This meta-analysis included thirteen studies with a total of 4,542 participants with TLFI incidence rate of 28%. Univariate analysis indicated that TLFI patients are significantly more likely to develop RBP compared to those without TLFI, with an odds ratio (OR) of 4.19 (95% CI: 2.49 to 7.05, I² = 76.9%). Sensitivity analysis identified two studies as significant influential outliers. Excluding these studies resulted reduced heterogeneity with OR of 4.62(95% CI: 3.61 to 5.92, I² = 0%). Multivariate analysis confirmed a strong association between TLFI and RBP after adjusting for confounders and other risk factors, with an OR of 4.57 (95% CI: 3.28 to 6.37, I² = 81.5%). Sensitivity analysis identified three studies as significant influential outliers, and excluding them resulted in an OR of 4.79 (95% CI: 3.76 to 6.11, I² = 0%) with no heterogeneity. This finding further confirms the association with a more homogenous overall effect estimate. Conclusion: The pooled effect size of univariate and multivariate analyses consistently showed that TLFI significantly increased the risk of developing RBP after PVA regardless of other related risk factors. Recognizing fascia injury as a potential source of postoperative pain could enhance patient care and mitigate postoperative pain.
Keywords: Fascia injury, Osteoporosis, Compression fracture, Meta-analysis, fragility fracture, Residual back pain
Received: 21 Nov 2024; Accepted: 17 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ahmed Mohamed, Xuyang, Zhiqiang and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Zhang Zhiqiang, Department of Orthopedics, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225001, Jiangsu Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.