![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Systems Endocrinology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1496696
This article is part of the Research Topic Mechanistic, Machine Learning and Hybrid Models of the 'Other' Endocrine Regulatory Systems in Health and Disease: Volume II View all 3 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: The stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) is a new insulin resistance assessment tool for patients, which has been linked to clinical adverse events. We aimed to explore the SHR–mortality relationship in critically ill patients with sepsis.Methods: Patients diagnosed with sepsis, along with blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c levels measured within 24 hours of admission, were retrospectively included in the analysis from the MIMIC-IV database between 2008 to 2019. Patients were stratified into quartile groups (quartile 1 (Q1) to quartile 4 (Q4)) according to SHR level, with 28-day mortality as the primary outcome. The SHR and short term mortality association in patients with sepsis was investigated via Cox regression and Kaplan‒Meier analyses. The robustness of the results was verified via multivariate adjustments, multicollinearity, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and the Boruta algorithm method. The complex relationships among the SHR, short-term mortality were estimated via restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses.Results: 2407 sepsis patients were involved, with a median age of 67 years, and 59.5% were male. Overall, 28-day, 60-day and 90-day mortality were 17.49% (n=421), 21.31% (n=513) and 23.89% (n=575), respectively. After adjusting confounding variables, the SHR was associated with greater short-term mortality, including 28-day (hazard ratio (HR)=1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.04-1.24, p=0.005; Q4 vs. Q1 (reference group), HR=1.41, 95% CI=1.06-1.87, p=0.017, p_trend=0.005), 60-day (HR=1.12, 95% CI=1.02-1.70, p=0.015; Q4 vs. Q1, HR=1.32, 95% CI=1.02-1.72, p=0.037, p_trend=0.021) and 90-day (HR=1.11, 95% CI=1.02-1.22, p=0.019; Q4 vs. Q1, HR=1.32, 95% CI=1.03–1.68, p=0.027, p_trend=0.017) mortality. Furthermore, the RCS analysis revealed a quasi U-shaped relationship with regards to SHR and short-term mortality in sepsis. The mortality rate increased with a SHR value larger or smaller than 0.9.Conclusions: Our research revealed that SHR could serve as a novel indicator for predicting short-term mortality in sepsis patients. SHR demonstrated a quasi U-shaped relationship with short-term mortality in sepsis.
Keywords: Stress hyperglycemia ratio, Sepsis, Mortality, Restricted cubic spline analysis, MIMIC-IV
Received: 15 Sep 2024; Accepted: 10 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Xia, Luo, Zhu, Zhu and Xie. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Xing Luo, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Guangzhou, China
Youfeng Zhu, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Guangzhou, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.