Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Translational and Clinical Endocrinology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1463379
This article is part of the Research Topic New insights: Developments in laboratory testing for the diagnosis and monitoring of endocrine related disorders and metabolic disease View all 7 articles

A NOVEL BIOASSAY FOR THYROID-BLOCKING IMMUNOGLOBULINS

Provisionally accepted
Augustine George Augustine George Johannes Lotz Johannes Lotz Maximilian Luffy Maximilian Luffy Anna-Lena Ganz Anna-Lena Ganz Jan Wolf Jan Wolf George J. Kahaly George J. Kahaly *
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Thyroid-blocking immunoglobulins (TBI) are present in 10-15% of patients with autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD). TBI affect thyroid function. The analytical performance of a novel TBI bioassay was evaluated. Methods: Sera from AITD patients were tested with a cell-based TBI reporter bioassay (Thyretain®) with expression of a Luciferase transgene as readout and a new “TurboTM” TBI bioassay with a readout based on a cyclic AMP-activated luciferase. All samples were also run on two TSH-R binding immunoassays. A Passing-Bablok regression, a Bland Altman plot, and user/lot comparisons were performed. In addition, dose-response curves for Turbo and Thyretain were fitted using serial dilutions and half maximal and 80% inhibitory concentrations (IC50 /IC80) were compared. Results: Of 1011 unselected AITD patients, 131 patients (212 samples) were TBI positive. Of 212 samples, 149 (70.3%), 47 (22%) and 16 (7.5%) were hypothyroid, euthyroid and hyperthyroid, respectively. The three thyrotropin receptor antibody (TSH-R-Ab) assays were negative in 90 controls devoid of autoimmune thyroid disorders. In contrast, the Turbo cyclic adenosine 3’,5’-monophosphate (cAMP) TBI, Thyretain TBI and the binding assays detected TBI in 212 (100%), 168 (79%) and 138/180 (65%) samples, respectively (p<0.001). Turbo highly correlated with thyroid function (p<0.001). The percentage inhibition in both Turbo and Thyretain correlated with TSH-R-Ab binding assay positivity (both p<0.001). The two bioassays correlated (r =0.8, p<0.001) and the Bland-Altman plot displayed no significant bias (0.24). Values scatter with slight systemic deviation between TBI mean values of 10–50% inhibition with higher Turbo than Thyretain results. Intra-assay validation demonstrated adequate precision with very low coefficient of variation (average CV 5.4%) and lower CV with samples with high inhibitory effect (CVAverage= 1.7% for a sample with 95% inhibition Thyretain). CV did not differ between users (p=0.35) and lots (p=0.121). IC50/IC80 values were 1.55 ng/ml/3.48ng/ml for Turbo and 6.76 ng/ml/18.46 ng/ml for Thyretain, respectively demonstrating the markedly higher sensitivity of Turbo. Conclusions: The novel, easy-to-perform, rapid and reliable Turbo TSH-R blocking bioassay detected significantly more TBI than the established immunoassays emphasizing its higher analytical performance and clinical utility in the management of patients with AITD.

    Keywords: thyroid-blocking immunoglobulins, thyrotropin receptor blocking antibodies, blocking TSH-R bioassay, homogenous cAMP biosensor, autoimmune thyroid disease

    Received: 11 Jul 2024; Accepted: 27 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 George, Lotz, Luffy, Ganz, Wolf and Kahaly. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: George J. Kahaly, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.