![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Cancer Endocrinology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1463131
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The incidence of lung cancer is gradually increasing and is often accompanied by bone metastases at the time of diagnosis. As society continues to develop, the aging of the population is increasing. This study aimed to develop a practical tool to identify the optimal beneficiary population for radiotherapy in elderly patients with bone metastases from lung cancer who have difficulty tolerating or refuse chemotherapy through a multicenter retrospective study.The study included 6228 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and 63 patients from our institution. The SEER cohort was randomized into a training cohort versus an internal validation cohort in a 7:3 ratio. Cox regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for patient mortality and to construct an associated predictive model. A risk classification system was developed based on the predictive model, and then subgroup analyses using Kaplan-Meier curves were performed to identify the population that would benefit optimally from radiotherapy in different risk subgroups.The predictive models constructed based on the results of multivariate Cox regression analysis showed relatively excellent performance. The area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.707 and 0.733 in the training cohort, 0.710 and 0.708 in the internal validation cohort, and 0.700 and 0.640 in the external validation cohort. The calibration curves further proved that the model had very high prediction accuracy.Decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated that the model could achieve a high net clinical benefit. The risk classification system developed based on the model successfully screened the best beneficiary population for radiotherapy. We recommend radiotherapy for high-risk risk patients, whereas radiotherapy is not recommended for middle and low risk patients.The risk classification system constructed in this study can help clinicians distinguish elderly lung cancer patients with bone metastases who have difficulty tolerating chemotherapy or refuse chemotherapy from those who can benefit optimally from radiotherapy, to achieve personalized and precise treatment for patients, avoiding the waste of medical resources and over-treatment of patients.
Keywords: Elderly, lung cancer, Bone Metastases, Radiotherapy, SEER
Received: 11 Jul 2024; Accepted: 04 Nov 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Huang, Chen, Yang, Zhao and Dai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Peilin Dai, Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.