Anna Perri
Vittoria Rago
Guadalupe Maya-Núñez- 1Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy
- 2Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, Rende (CS), Italy
- 3Unidad de Investigación Médica en Medicina Reproductiva, Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico
Editorial on the Research Topic
New insights into prostate cancer: new biomarkers, molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic approaches
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most frequent cancer among men worldwide (1). PCa is considered curable when it is localized, but when it metastasizes the clinical treatment is complex. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a regular treatment for PCa patients; however, some of them develop castration-resistant PCa (CRPC), and despite several new treatment options, metastatic CRPC has a poor prognosis with a survival rate below 2–3 years (2).
The present Research Topic aims to present new emerging evidence in diagnostics and treatment of PCa.
The Prostate specific antigen (PSA) is a poor indicator of early PCa, particularly if its levels are between 4 and 20 ng/ml. Among other PCa serum markers, Sialic acid (SA) represents a potential candidate for tumor aggressiveness, as demonstrated in other types of cancer (3). Sun and Yan reported that in patients with PSA values between 4 and 20 ng/mL, the serum biochemical index, including SA, is a potential prediction marker for PCa. The authors suggested that SA levels could prevent unnecessary biopsies and biopsy-related morbidities. Furthermore, Sun et al., demonstrated that the serum SA levels in patients without treatment are positively correlated with bone metastases, consequently proposing that elevated SA levels before surgery could be an indicator of increased malignancy risk and advanced cancer stages. Cathepsins play a crucial role in preserving cellular homeostasis; however, under inflammatory conditions, they can drive cancer progression and other diseases (4, 5). The Mendelian randomization study of Cao et al., provided new insights into the role of cathepsins in the diagnosis and treatment of benign prostate diseases (BPD), as they offered the first evidence of a genetic causal link between cathepsins and BPD.
The identification of new specific markers associated with cancer recurrence is critical in the management of PCa patients. The autophagy-related gene expression levels have great potential in predicting tumor recurrence risk and evaluating the response to treatment in PCa patients (6, 7). Kang et al., built a risk model using four anoikis-related genes that effectively predict the risk of recurrence and survival outcomes in PCa patients, confirming the clinical value of in-depth investigation of anoikis-related genes in PCa.
Drug resistance CRPC mechanisms due to AR splice variants, mutations, or glucocorticoid receptor (GR) substitution of AR function, is a common cause of treatment failure. The search for pharmacological agents to overcome this cancer resistance conducted to plant extracts research (8). Lam et al., demonstrated the efficacy of the bioactive compound YIV-818-A in overcoming drug resistance caused by AR variants and GR, by inhibiting AR and GR activities. Some studies elucidated the molecular mechanism underlying the anti-tumor effects of curcumin on both androgen-sensitive and -insensitive prostate cancer cells (9). The meta-analyses conducted by Wang et al. showed a favorable association between PCa and curcumin treatment, highlighting that the curcumin dosage potentially impacted the treatment efficacy. Overall these findings further reinforce the concept that dietary supplements could be used as chemoprevention agent for PCa, although further studies are needed to ascertain their use in the clinical practice.
G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) plays an important role in tumor development and metastasis, by activating different signaling pathways (10, 11). The GPER-mediated signaling in PCa is the hedgehog (Hh) pathway and has not been widely investigated. This signaling-pathway activation is associated with aggressiveness, metastasis, and relapse in triple-negative breast cancer, occurring via glioma-associated oncogene homolog (GLI) transcriptional factors (12). The study of Rico-Fuentes et al., performed on PCa samples with different prognostic grades demonstrated that GPER is highly expressed in the nucleus and its expression increases with the cancer progression. Furthermore, GPER’s expression correlates with pGLI3 nuclear expression across different stage groups, suggesting that GPER could represent a new marker of tumor aggressiveness.
Insulin growth factor (IGF) signaling plays a key role in the development and progression of PCa. Consequently, targeting IGF signaling has been considered a potential therapeutic strategy for this cancer (13). Elemam et al., provided an overview of the main evidence on prostate tumorigenesis regulation via the IGF system, highlighting that drugs targeting the IGF family could represent a promising therapeutic approach in the management of advanced PCa.
Many researchers found a complex and close association between the immune system and PCa (14). Still, few studies have investigated the association between immune cells and the risk of PCa. Hao et al., identified immune cell phenotypes significantly associated with PCa, contributing to open new insights for exploring potential immunotherapeutic targets in PCa.
An increasing number of articles highlight the positive surgical margin (PSM) as a relevant parameter to make decisions for adjuvant treatment and predict patient outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP), mainly in patients with localized PCa (15). Therefore, the factors influencing PSM should be considered by urologists during operation, regardless of the surgery approach (i.e. robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open RP). The monocentric study of Wang et al. showed that PSM risk was increased in patients receiving hormonal therapy before the surgery compared with patients without treatment, highlighting that the resection extent should be accurately evaluated. In the past, the RP was rarely the first option for advanced PCa, but thanks to the introduction of robot-assisted RP, it has been reported that advanced PCa patients respond well to ADT therapy and have better progression-free survival after cytoreductive prostatectomy, suggesting that surgery might be an effective treatment option also for advanced PCa (16). Li et al. built a clinical features-based prognosis model demonstrating the benefits of surgery in patients with advanced PCa, and emphasizing that its accuracy may offer some reference on clinical decision-making.
In conclusion, this Research Topic presents interesting new evidence in the field of precision medicine for PCa diagnosis and treatment. Although relevant progress has been made, further studies are needed to better understand how to overcome castration resistance, find new predictors of tumor recurrences, and improve the survival rate.
Author contributions
AP: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. VR: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. GM-N: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Kaiser A, Haskins C, Siddiqui MM, Hussain A, D’Adamo C. The evolving role of diet in prostate cancer risk and progression. Curr Opin Oncol. (2019) 31:222–9. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000519
2. Nuhn P, De Bono JS, Fizazi K, Freedland SJ, Grilli M, Kantoff PW, et al. Update on systemic prostate cancer therapies: management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the era of precision oncology. Eur Urol. (2019) 75:88–99. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.03.028
3. Zhang Z, Wuhrer M, Holst S. Serum sialylation changes in cancer. Glycoconj J. (2018) 35:139–60. doi: 10.1007/s10719-018-9820-0
4. Patel S, Homaei A, El-Seedi HR, Akhtar N. Cathepsins: Proteases that are vital for survival but can also be fatal. BioMed Pharmacother. (2018) 105:526–32. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.05.148
5. Miyake H, Hara I, Eto H. Serum level of cathepsin B and its density in men with prostate cancer as novel markers of disease progression. Anticancer Res. (2004) 24:2573–7.
6. Zhao X, Wang Z, Tang Z, Hu J, Zhou Y, Ge J, et al. An anoikis-related gene signature for prediction of the prognosis in prostate cancer. Front Oncol. (2023) 13:1169425. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1169425
7. Wen C, Ge Q, Dai B, Li J, Yang F, Meng J, et al. Signature for prostate cancer based on autophagy-related genes and a nomogram for quantitative risk stratification. Dis Markers. (2022) 2022:7598942. doi: 10.1155/2022/7598942
8. Kallifatidis G, Hoy JJ, Lokeshwar BL. Bioactive natural products for chemoprevention and treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. (2016) 40–41:160–9. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2016.06.003
9. Termini D, Den Hartogh DJ, Jaglanian A, Tsiani E. Curcumin against prostate cancer: current evidence. Biomolecules. (2020) 10:1536. doi: 10.3390/biom10111536
10. Ramírez-de-Arellano A, Pereira-Suárez AL, Rico-Fuentes C, López-Pulido EI, Villegas-Pineda JC, Sierra-Diaz E. Distribution and effects of estrogen receptors in prostate cancer: associated molecular mechanisms. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2021) 12:811578. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.811578
11. Rago V, Romeo F, Giordano F, Ferraro A, Carpino A. Identification of the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) in human prostate: expression site of the estrogen receptor in the benign and neoplastic gland. Andrology. (2016) 4:121–7. doi: 10.1111/andr.12131
12. Xu T, Ma D, Chen S, Tang R, Yang J, Meng C, et al. High GPER expression in triple-negative breast cancer is linked to pro-metastatic pathways and predicts poor patient outcomes. NPJ Breast Cancer. (2022) 8:100. doi: 10.1038/s41523-022-00472-4
13. Liu G, Zhu M, Zhang M, Pan F. Emerging role of IGF-1 in prostate cancer: A promising biomarker and therapeutic target. Cancers (Basel). (2023) 15:1287. doi: 10.3390/cancers15041287
14. Molina OE, LaRue H, Simonyan D, Hovington H, Têtu B, Fradet V, et al. High infiltration of CD209+ dendritic cells and CD163+ macrophages in the peritumor area of prostate cancer is predictive of late adverse outcomes. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1205266. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1205266
15. Chapin BF, Nguyen JN, Achim MF, Navai N, Williams SB, Prokhorova IN, et al. Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. (2018) 21:221–7. doi: 10.1038/s41391-017-0019-4
Keywords: prostate cancer (PCa), castration-resistant PCa (CRPC), biomarkers, androgen receptor, G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER), positive surgical margins, bioactive compounds
Citation: Perri A, Rago V and Maya-Núñez G (2024) Editorial: New insights into prostate cancer: new biomarkers, molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic approaches. Front. Endocrinol. 15:1453065. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1453065
Received: 22 June 2024; Accepted: 08 July 2024;
Published: 24 July 2024.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Antonino Belfiore, University of Catania, ItalyCopyright © 2024 Perri, Rago and Maya-Núñez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Anna Perri, anna.perri@unicz.it; Vittoria Rago, vittoria.rago@unical.it